Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Art we trust

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Culture is an experience good and has strong externalities. Culture has social value, option value, existence value, innovation value, and intergenerational value. None of these are internalised by the market. One should avoid that culture appeals to a small elite. It is thus crucial to invest in cultural education, to bring culture to places where the people are, and to put a greater emphasis on demand-side rather than supply-side cultural subsidies. One should try to avoid that high culture becomes marginalised in a multicultural society with many demands on leisure time. The government should avoid deadweight losses, but should also minimise the potential for rent seeking and lobbying. It is crucial that the government stays at arm's length and leaves artistic judgements to independent experts and interested laymen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baumol, William J. (1986), 'Unnatural Value: Or Art Investment as Foating Crap Game',' American Economic Review, 76, pp. 10-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J. and William G. Bowen (1966), Performing Arts - The Economic Dilemma, Cambridge, MA, Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. (ed.) (1976), The Economics of the Arts, London, Martin Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, Hans (1997), Publiek gezocht, Amsterdam/Meppel, Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieau, Pièrre (1979), La distinction - critique sociale due jugement, Paris, Editions de minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broek, Andries van den and Jos de Haan (2000), 'Cultuur tussen competentie en competitie', Amsterdam/ SCP, The Hague, Boekmanstudies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, Tyler (1998), In Praise of Commercial Culture, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, Martin (ed.) (1991), The Economics of Art Museums, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. and Werner W. Pommerehne (1989), Muses and Markets: Explorations in the Economics of the Arts, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. (2000), Arts & Economics - Analysis & Cultural Policy, Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, Victor A. and Pierre-Michel Menger (eds.) (1996), Economics of the Arts - Selected Essays, Amsterdam, Elsevier / North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grampp, William D. (1989), Pricing the Priceless - Art, Artists and Economics, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauwe, Paul de (1990), De Nachtwacht in het donker, Tielt, Lannoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubbels, Truus (1999), Passie of professie, Abcoude, Uniepers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, James and Charles M. Gray (1993), The Economics of Art and Culture - An American Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, Michael and Ilde Rizzo (eds.) (1997), Economic Perspectives on Cultural Heritage, Basingstoke, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, Arjo (ed.) (1996), The Value of Culture - On the Relationship between Economics and Arts, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas G. (1968), The Economics of American Theatre, Durham NC, Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossetto, Gianfranco (1993), Aesthetics and Economics, Boston, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, Dick (1978), The Subsidized Muse - Public Support for the Arts in the United States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCW (1998), Cultuurbeleid in Nederland, Zoetermeer, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, John W. (1998), The State and the Arts - An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and the United States, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T. (1969), 'Welfare Economics and Public Subsidies to the Arts',' Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 37, pp. 323-335, reprinted in Blaug (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T. (1993), Paying the Piper - Culture, Music and Money, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T. (ed.) (1998), Does the Past have a Future? - The Political Economy of Heritage, London, Institute of Economic Affair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan T. and Ronald Weir (1976), The Composer in the Market Place, London, Faber Music.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. Joseph and James H. Gilmore (1999), The Experience Economy, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, Rick van der (1997), 'Kunst op het net', in: Een schaap in wolfskleren, Amsterdam, Prometheus, pp. 141-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, Rick van der (1999), Cultuur als confrontatie - Uitgangspunten voor het cultuurbeleid 2001-2004, Zoetermeer, Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschappen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puffelen, Frank van (2000), Culturele economie in de Lage Landen, Amsterdam, Boekmanstudies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel C. (1963) 'Arts and the State',' in: Lionel C. Robbins (ed.), Politics and Economics: Essays in Political Economy, pp. 53-72, London, Macmillan, pp. 53-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin (1981), 'The Economics of Superstars',' American Economic Review, 71, pp. 848-858.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (1999), Sociale en Culturele Verkenningen, The Hague.

  • SCP (2000), 'Het bereik van de kunsten', Het Culturele Draagvlak, 4, The Hague.

  • Swaan, Abram de (1991), 'Kwaliteit is klasse',' in: Perron Nederland, Amsterdam, Meulenhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David C. (1994), 'The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics',' Journal of Economic Literature, 33, pp. 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David C. (2001), Economics and Culture, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, David C. and Glen A. Withers (1979), The Economics of the Performing Arts, New York / Melbourne, Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth (1993), Singers in the Market Place - The Economics of the Singing Profession, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth (ed.) (1997), Cultural Economics: The Arts, the Heritage and the Media Industriesv, two volumes, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon (1971), 'Public Decisions as Public Goods',' Journal of Political Economy, 79, pp. 913-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon (1980), 'Efficient Rent Seeking',' in: James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, and Gordon Tullock (eds.), Towards a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society, College Station, Texas A&M Press, pp. 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, Nachoem M. (1994), 'Art and Technology: A Comparative Study of Policy Legitimation',' Journal of Cultural Economics, 18(1), pp. 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, Nachoem M. (1995), 'Selection Processes and Appropriability in Art, Science and Technology',' Journal of Cultural Economics, 19,3, pp. 221-235.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Former State Secretary for Education, Culture, and Sciences and Visiting Professor at CESifo, University of Munich and the London School of Economics, the Netherland

    Rick Van Der Ploeg

Authors
  1. Rick Van Der Ploeg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Ploeg, R. In Art we trust. De Economist 150, 333–362 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020127924021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020127924021

Keywords

Search

Navigation