Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding activity scheduling and rescheduling behaviour: Theory and numerical illustration

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arentze T.A., Hofman F., Van Mourik H. and Timmermans H.J.P. 2000: Albatross: A multi-agent rule-based model of activity pattern decisions. Transportation Research Record, 1706: 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arentze T., Dijst M., Dugundji E., Joh C.H., Kapoen L., Krijgsman S., Maat K., Timmermans H. and Veldhuisen J. 2001: The Amadeus program: Scope and conceptual development. Paper presented at the 9th World Conference on Transportation Research, Seoul, July.

  • Bhat C.R. and Koppelman F.S. 1993: A conceptual framework of individual activity program generation. Transportation Research A, 27: 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat C.R. and Koppelman F.S. 2000: Activity-based travel demand analysis: History, results and future directions. Paper presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, January.

  • Bowman J.L. and Ben-Akiva M.E. 2000: Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transportation Research A, 35: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett P. and Hanson S. 1982: The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behaviour in spatially-constrained situations: Definition and measurement issues. Transportation Research A, 16: 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damm D. and Lerman S.R. 1981: A theory of activity scheduling behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 13: 703–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty S.T. and Miller E.J. 2000: A computerised household activity scheduling behaviour. Transportation, 27: 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D., Borgers A. and Timmermans H. 1993: A simulation model of activity scheduling behaviour. Transportation Research Record, 1413: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D. and Timmermans H. 1997: Theories and models of activity-travel patterns. In: Ettema D. and Timmermans H.J.P. (eds) Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analyses. Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii S., Kitamura R. and Monma T. 1998: A utility-based micro-simulation model system of individuals' activity-travel patterns. Paper presented at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., January.

  • Gärling T., Kwan M.P. and Golledge R.G. 1994: Computational-process modelling of household activity scheduling. Transportation Research B, 28: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T., Kalen T., Romanus T. and Selart M. 1998: Computer simulation of household activity scheduling. Environment and Planning A, 30: 665–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T., Gillholm R. and Montgomery W. 1999: The role of anticipated time pressure in activity scheduling. Transportation, 26: 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joh C.H., Arentze T.A. and Timmermans H.J.P. 2001: Towards a theory and simulation model of activity-travel rescheduling behavior. Paper presented at the 9th World Conference on Transportation Research, Seoul, July.

  • Joh C.H., Arentze T.A. and Timmermans H.J.P. 2002: Modelling individuals' activity-travel rescheduling heuristics: Theory and numerical experiments. To appear in Transportation Research Record.

  • Jones P., Dix M., Clarke M. and Heggie I. 1983: Understanding Travel Behaviour. Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura R., Yamamoto T. and Fujii S. 1996: A discrete-continuous analysis of time allocation to two types of discretionary activities which accounts for unobserved heterogeneity. In J.B. Lesort (ed.) Transportation and Traffic Theory. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 431–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally M.G. 1997: An activity-based micro-simulation model for travel demand forecasting. In: Ettema D. and Timmermans H.J.P. (eds) Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pred A. 1981: Of paths and projects: Individual behavior and its societal context. In: Cox K.R. and Golledge R.G. (eds) Behavioural Problems in Geography Revisited. Methuen, London, pp. 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker W.W., McNally M.G. and Root G.S. 1985: Travel/activity analysis: Pattern recognition, classification and interpretation. Transportation Research A, 19: 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recker W.W. 1995: The household activity pattern problem: General formulation and solution. Transportation Research B, 29: 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supernak J. 1988: A dynamic interplay of activities and travel: Analysis of time of day utility profiles. In: Jones P. (ed.) Developments in Dynamic and Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N.J. 1983: On the determination of social action in space and time. Environment and Planning D, 1: 23–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans H.J.P., Arentze T.A. and Joh C.H. 2001: Modelling the effects of anticipated time pressure on the execution of activity programs. Transportation Research Record, 1752: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joh, CH., Arentze, T.A. & Timmermans, H.J. Understanding activity scheduling and rescheduling behaviour: Theory and numerical illustration. GeoJournal 53, 359–371 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020145214526

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020145214526

Navigation