Skip to main content
Log in

Eco-design: The State of Implementation in Europe – Conclusions of a State of the Art Study for IPTS

  • Published:
The Journal of Sustainable Product Design

Abstract

In support of the development of an Integrated Product Policy (IPP) in the EU, six leading institutes in the field of sustainable product development (SPD) have analysed the state of the art in Europe. For each EU member state, four elements reflecting the demand and supply side of SPD were analysed. These concerns were method development, dissemination, and education (supply side oriented) and practical application (demand side oriented). A structured, qualitative indicator system (based on so-called 'maturity profiles') was developed that were used and by a panel of (inter)national experts as basis of judgment on a per-country basis. To get additional insight in practical application, a study of the Fortune 500 companies was performed. The results showed that the EU countries can roughly be divided in three groups: 'front runners', who have set the scene for about 10 years with regard to method development and dissemination; 'intermediates', who have been setting up their programmes for 5 years now; and 'inactives', where SPD is practised only in individual cases. It was striking, however, that even in the front runner countries practical application was still quite limited. Even in these cases, eco-design is mainly practised by several dozen 'champion' firms, which mainly concentrated on incremental improvements rather than re-design or system innovations. The front runners are mainly advanced in terms of method development and, to some extent, dissemination and education. Concerning method development, dissemination of knowledge should take place from front runners to other EU countries. New method development should mainly concentrate on issues still new for them (e.g. methods aimed at functional innovation). Dissemination should be given more emphasis. Above all, analysis should be conducted on how the demand side of SPD can be strengthened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • de Bruijn, Th. and A. Tukker (eds) (2002), Partnership and Leadership: Building Alliances for a Sustainable Future. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J.M., W.J.V. Vermeulen and M.T.J. Kok (1994), Met beleid naar milieugerichte productontwikkeling. NOTA, The Hague, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, J.M. (1997), Environmental Management: From 'Fit' to 'stretch'. Abridged version of the inaugural address given at the acceptance of the position of Professor of Environmental Management at the Catholic University of Brabant,, 11 April 1997. Dutch version: Jan van Arkel Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands. English version: TNO Report 97/45, TNOSTB, Delft, The Netherlands.

  • Elkington, J. (1998), Cannibals with Forks. Capstone Publishing, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young and SPRU (1998), European Commission, DG XI: Integrated Product Policy. EU, DG XI, Brussels, Belgium, March 1998. Available from: http://europa. eu.int/comm/environment/ipp/ ippsum.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (1998), Integrated Product Policy, report of a workshop held on 8 December in Brussels, Belgium. See internet: europa.eu.int.

  • EU (2001), White Paper on Integrated Product Policy. EU DG ENV., Brussels, Belgium. Available from http://europa.eu.int.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussler, C., with P. James (1996), Driving Eco-innovation. Pittman Publishing, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. and R. Kemp (2000), Transities vanuit Socio-Technisch Perspectief (Transitions from a Socio-Technical Perspective). University of Twente, Enschede, and MERIT, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R. (1995), Environmental Policy and Technical Change. A comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments. Ph.D. Thesis, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klostermann, J.E.M. and A. Tukker (eds) (1998), Product Innovation and Ecoefficiency, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/ London/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • RAND (1997), Technologieradar. RAND Europe for the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Hague, The Netherlands.

  • Rotmans, J. (ed) (2000), Transitions and transition management. ICES/MERIT/TUE, Maastricht/ Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A., E. Haag, P. Eder, A. Vercalsteren, Th. Wiedmann U. Tischner, M. Charter, I Belmane, G. Timmers, M. van der Vlugt (2000). Eco-design: European State of the Art. Part I and Part II. Part I: IPTS report EUR 19583 EN, IPTS, Seville, Spain (60 pp.). Part II: downloadable via www-.jrc.es, 400 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weterings, R. and H. Opschoor (1992). Environmental Space as a Challenge for Technology Development. RMNO, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD (1999), Sustainability through the market. Executive Brief, February 1999. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tukker, A., Eder (IPTS, P., Charter, M. et al. Eco-design: The State of Implementation in Europe – Conclusions of a State of the Art Study for IPTS. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 1, 147–161 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020564820675

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020564820675

Keywords

Navigation