Abstract
The paper is about negotiating with issues that discourage innovation. The subject is environmental deterioration, with concern directed at the impediments that keep it from being innovatively resolved. The paper is organized around three issues. (1) The dominant model of environmental concern, called environmental protection, is managed predominantly via command and control approaches. (2) Command and control, by relying on analytical segmentation to subdivide the problem into digestible bits and using formal legislation to direct it, are not up to emerging challenges in the area. (3) More robust models are available but difficult to experiment with due to impediments that discourage change. These impediments are seen in ideals associated with protection, prevention, recycling, and sustainability that tend to do more to sustain harmful practices than to seek beneficial alternatives. Being able to appreciate the underlying restrictions of entropy could help stimulate a more innovative agenda. These issues are tested via a project funded by the EPA entitled ENERGY STAR Homes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackoff, R. (1974). Redesigning the Future John Wiley & Sons, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a Theory of Personality Viking Press, New York (especially Chap. 4).
Davies, P. C. (1974). The Physics of Time Asymmetry Surrey University Press, London.
Emery, F. E., and Trist, E. L. (1973). Towards a Social Ecology: Contextual Appreciations of the Future in the Present Plenum, London, p. vii.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 1244.
Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 280 682.
Hawk, D. L. (1977). Environmental Deterioration: Analytic Solutions in Search of Synthetic Problems Institute of International Business Series, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden, Vols. 1–3.
Hawk, D. L. (1979). Regulation of Environmental Deterioration Dissertation, Social Systems Sciences Program, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kaufmann, W. (1980). Discovering the Mind McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 25.
Laszlo, E. (1972). The Relevance of General Systems Theory George Braziller, New York.
MISTRA (1998). The Theory and Practice of Interdisciplinary Work, Conference of the Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research and the Council for Planning and Co-ordination of Research, Mistra, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 3–4.
New York Times (1998). Physical laws collide in a black hole bet, April 7, p.F1.
Popper, K. (1958). The arrow of time. Nature 177 538.
Science Now (1998). Science Magazine Web Site, 1070/1.
Schimel, D. S. (1955). In Houghton, J. T., et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 39–71.
Thomson, W. (1852). On a universal tendency. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Vol. 3 p. 139. [In Price, H. (1996). Time's Arrow & Archimedes' Point Oxford University Press: New York.]
Vitousek, P. (1999). Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 1/26 5325.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory George Braziller, New York, p. 39.
Watzlawick et al. (1974). Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution Norton, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hawk, D.L. Innovation Versus Environmental Protection Presumptions. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12, 355–366 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022444229252
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022444229252