Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Perceived Autonomy and Competence

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two studies examined the impact of performance-contingent rewards on perceived autonomy, competence, and intrinsic motivation. Autonomy was measured in terms of both decisional and affective reports. The first study revealed an undermining effect of performance-contingent rewards on affective reports of autonomy among university students, and an increase in reports of competence. Decisional autonomy judgements were unaffected by rewards. The second study replicated this pattern of findings among elementary school children. These results help resolve Cognitive Evaluation Theory's (E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan, 1985; R. M. Ryan, V. Mims, & R. Koestner, 1983) and Eisenberger, Rhoades, et al.'s (R. Eisenberger, L. Rhoades, & J. Cameron, 1999) divergent positions on the impact of performance-contingent rewards on autonomy. The studies also included measures of intrinsic motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, M. W., & Sinclair, L. (1996). Self-esteem and “if...then” contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1972). Effects of contingent and non-contingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 39–80). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of rewards: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Leonard, J. M. (1980). Effects of conceptual task difficulty on generalized persistence. American Journal of Psychology, 93, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Masterson, F. A. (1983). Required high effort increases subsequent persistence and reduces cheating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 593–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Masterson, F. A., & McDermitt, M. (1982). Effects of task variety on generalized effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 499–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D., & Cameron, J. (1999). Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation—negative, neutral, and positive: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 677–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., & Cameron, J. (1999). Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1026–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., & Manderlink, G. (1983). A process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 531–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Manderlink, G., & Sansone, C. (1984). Rewarding pinball wizardry: The effects of evaluation on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T. S., Cooper, E. E., & Smith, T. W. (1977). Attribution of causality and the overjustification effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T. S., Davey, M. E., Alafat, K. A., Wetherill, K. V., & Kramer, N. A. (1980). Informational versus controlling verbal rewards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 228–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1976). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: England: Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2001). The experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Iowa, AMES.

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). On happiness and human potential: A review of research on hedonic and evdaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the interpersonal sphere: An extension of Cognitive Evaluation Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1998). “Reality” is complicated. American Psychologist, 53, 673–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Porac, J. F., Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E. L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443–446.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Houlfort, N., Koestner, R., Joussemet, M. et al. The Impact of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Perceived Autonomy and Competence. Motivation and Emotion 26, 279–295 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022819120237

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022819120237

Navigation