Skip to main content
Log in

Biological suppression of rice diseases by Pseudomonas spp. under saline soil conditions

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop antagonistic strains specific for the coastal agricultural niche in Southern India. Indigenous Pseudomonas strains isolated from rhizosphere of rice cultivated in the coastal agri-ecosystem were screened for in vitro antibiosis against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzaeand Rhizoctonia solani– the bacterial leaf blight (BB) and sheath blight (ShB) pathogens of rice (Oryza sativa) respectively. The strains exhibiting antibiosis were tested in the greenhouse under normal and saline soil conditions. The antagonists suppressed BB by 15 to 74% in an unamended soil. The efficient strains were tested under saline soil conditions and found to suppress disease by 46 to 82%. Similarly, incidence of ShB was also suppressed by 30 to 57% in the unamended soil by the efficient strains which, under saline soil conditions, were found to suppress ShB by 19 to 51%. Four strains of Pseudomonas tested suppressed both BB and ShB diseases in rice, of which three were efficient under both natural and saline soil conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alm E W, Oerther D B, Larsen N, Stahl D A and Raskin L 1996 Oligonucleotide probe database. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3557–3559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anjaiah V, Koedam N, Nowak Thompson B, Loper J E, Hofte M, Tambong J T and Cornelis P 1998 Involvement of phenazines and anthranilate in the antagonism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 and Tn5 derivatives towards Fusarium spp and Pythium spp Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 11, 847–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeufgras J M, Balyer J M, Allard F and Diaz M 1987 A new computer program for routine interpretation of API system. II conference on taxonomy and automatic identification of bacteria, Prague, June 29th–July 3rd.

  • Cook R J, Thomashow L S, Weller D M, Fujimoto D, Mazzola M, Bangera G and Kim D S 1995 Molecular mechanisms of defense by rhizobacteria against root disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 4197–4201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupler M and Baker R 1984 Survival of Pseudomonas putida, a biological control agent in soil. Phytopathol. 74, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers T J, Flowers S A, Hajibagheri M A and Yeo A R 1990 Salt tolerance in the halophytic wild rice Porteresia coarctata Tateoka. New Phytol. 114, 675–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanamanickam S S and Mew T W 1992 Biological control of blast disease of rice (Oryza sativa L.) with antagonistic bacteria and its mediation with a Pseudomonas antibiotic. Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 58, 380–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanamanickam S S, R Valasubramanian, K V Thara and A K Chatterjee 1998 Microbial antagonists for rice diseases control: Molecular Approaches In Microbes: for Health, Wealth and Sustainable Environment. Ed. Ajit Varma. pp. 371–388. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanamanickam S S, Priyadarshini V B, Narayanan N N, Vasudevan P and Kavitha S 1999 An overview of bacterial blight disease of rice and strategies for its management. Curr. Sci. 77, 1435–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gnanamanickam S S, Preeti Vasudevan, Brinda Vankatesan, Lavanya Babajee and Kavitha S 2001 Biological control of rice diseases In Biological Control of Major Crop Diseases. Ed. S S Gnanamanickam. Marcel Dekkar, NY (In press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalaswamy G 2001 Cyanobacteria for stress environments In Technological Perspectives of Azolla and Cyanobacterial Biofertilizers. Eds. S Kannaiyan, S Govindarajan and K Kumar. Azolla Laboratory, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves L M and Swaminathan B 1993 Universal DNA isolation procedure. In Diagnostic Molecular Biology. Eds. D H Persing, T F Smith, F C Tenover and T J White. pp. 617–621. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janisiewicz W J and Roitman J 1988 Biological control of blue mould and gray mould on apple and pear with Pseudomonas cepacia. Postharvest Pathology and Mycotoxins 78, 1697–1700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann H E, Reddy A P K, Hseih S P Y and Merca S S 1973 An improved technique for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Disease Reporter 57, 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavitha S 1999 Suppression of bacterial leaf blight of rice by Pseudomonas putida V14i and its endophytic survival in rice tissues. M.Phil Dissertation, University of Madras.

  • Lewis J A and Papavizas G C 1987 Reduction of inoculum of Rhizoctonia solani in soil by germlings of Trichoderma hamatum. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 19, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mew T W 1992 Compendium of Rice Diseases. pp. 62. American Phytopathological Society. St Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mew T W and Rosales A M 1986 Bacterization of rice plants for control of sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathol. 76, 1260–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nautiyal C S 1999 Bioinoculants for sustainable agriculture: recent status and constraints. In Microbial Biotechnology for Sustainable Development and Productivity. Ed. R C Rajak. pp. 1–11. Scientific publishers, Jodhpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papavizas G C and Lewis J A 1983 Physiological biocontrol characteristics of stable mutants of Trichoderma viride resistance to MBC fungicides. Phytopathol. 73, 407–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez F and Pfender W F 1997 Antibiosis and antagonism of Sclerotinia homo eocarpa and Drechslera poae by Pseudomonas fluorescens PF-5 in vitro and in planta. Phytopathol. 87, 614–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross I L, Alami Y, Harvey P R, Achouak W and Ryder M H 2000 Genetic diversity and biological control activity of novel species of closely related pseudomonads isolated from wheat field soils in South Australia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1609–1616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thara K V 1994 Biological Control of Rice Sheath Blight by Bacterial Antagonists: Mechanisms of Disease Suppression. Doctoral thesis, University of Madras. pp. 8–53.

  • Thomashow L S, Bonsall R F and Weller D M 1997 Antibiotic production by soil and rhizosphere microbes in situ. In Manual of Environmental Microbiology. Eds. C J Hurst, D R Knudsen, M J McInerney, L D Stetzenbach and M V Walter. pp. 493–499. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overbeek L S and Van Elsas J D 1995 Root exudates induced promoter activity in Pseudomonas fluorescens mutant in the wheat rhizosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 890–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer F, Seidler R J, Gillevet P M, Watrud L S and Giovanni G D 1998 A highly selective PCR protocol for detecting 16S rRNA genes of the genus Pseudomonas (sensu stricto) in environmental samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 2545–2553

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudha Nair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sunita Rangarajan, Saleena, L.M., Vasudevan, P. et al. Biological suppression of rice diseases by Pseudomonas spp. under saline soil conditions. Plant and Soil 251, 73–82 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022950811520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022950811520

Navigation