Abstract
This paper examines the processing of embedded clauses in German which are ambiguous between a subject-before-object and an object-before-subject order. In an experiment using a speeded grammaticality judgment task, four types of locally ambiguous clauses were compared: (i) sentences involving movement of a definite noun phrase (NP), (ii) sentences involving pronoun movement, (iii) relative clauses, and (iv) embedded questions. We found that readers were consistently garden-pathed in the object-before-subject condition, regardless of sentence type. Furthermore, there were considerable differences with respect to garden-path strength. The garden-path effect was strongest for sentences involving scrambling. In addition, sentences involving pronoun movement induced more processing difficulty than embedded questions and relative clauses. We argue that our findings can be best explained within a serial processing model that acknowledges both syntactic and nonsyntactic influences on reanalysis and that can account for graded effects of garden-path strength.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bader, M. (1994). Sprachverstehen: Syntax und Prosodie beim Lesen [Language processing: Syntax and prosody in reading]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Bader, M. (1996). Syntactic and morphological contributions to processing subject-object ambiguities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bader, M. (1998). Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences. In J. Fodor, & F. Fereirra (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 1-46). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Bader, M., Bayer, J., Hopf, J.-M., & Meng, M. (1996). Case-assignment in processing German verb-final clauses. In C. Schuetze (Ed.), Proceedings of the NELS 26 Workshop on Sentence Processing (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Vol 9, pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bader, M., & Lasser, I. (1994) German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: Evidence for immediate attachment. In: C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 225-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bayer, J., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1992). Configurationality in the light of language comprehension: The order of arguments in German. Unpublished manuscript.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 506-569). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
Clifton, C. Jr., & Frazier, L. (1989) Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. Carlson & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273-317). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Culicover, P., & Rochemont, M. (1983). Stress and focus in English. Language, 59, 123-165.
De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555-568.
Fodor, J. D. (1978) Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 427-473.
Fodor, J. D. (1989) Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI 155-209.
Fodor, J. D. (1990) Comments on the chapters by Frazier and Tanenhaus et al. In G. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 434-456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden paths. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 407-434.
Frazier, L. (1979). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Frazier, L. (1987a). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 559-586). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frazier, L. (1987b). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519-559.
Frazier, L. & Clifton, C. Jr., (1998). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In J. Fodor, & F. Fereirra (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 143-176). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
Friederici, A. D., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 157-176.
Gibson, E. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.
Gibson, E., Hickok, G., & Schütze, C. (1994). Processing empty categories: A parallel approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 381-405.
Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Gorrell, P. (1996). Parsing theory and phrase-order variation in German V2 clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 135-156.
Haider, H. (1993). Deutsche Syntax—generativ. Vorstudien zu einer projektiven Theorie der Grammatik. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.
Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Strube, G. (1993). Incremental syntax processing and parsing strategies. In Proceedings of the XVth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 539-544). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. D. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai, (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A.D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477-494.
Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Rochemont, M. S. (1986). Focus in generative grammar. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Rochemont, M. S., & Culicover, P. W. (1990). English focus constructions and the theory of focus. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kühn, K. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 499-520.
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The Relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stechow, A., von (1991). Current issues in the theory of focus. In A. von Stechow, & D. Wunderlich (Ed.), Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (pp. 804-825). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
Weinberg, A. (1993). Parameters in the theory of sentence processing: Minimal commitment theory goes east. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 338-364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bader, M., Meng, M. Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison. J Psycholinguist Res 28, 121–143 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023206208142
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023206208142