Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of International and Domestic New Ventures

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences between international new ventures (INVs) and domestic new ventures (DNVs) were examined using a sample of 214 IPO new ventures (ventures 6 years old or less). INVs were found to be significantly different on the basis of their entrepreneurial team experience, strategy, and industry structure. Specifically, the entrepreneurial team of INVs exhibited higher levels of previous international and industry experience. The strategies of INVs were more aggressive, and they operated in more channels of distribution than did DNVs. INVs competed on the basis of differentiation, placing greater emphasis on product innovation, quality, service, and marketing as strategic weapons. In addition, INVs were more likely than DNVs to operate in industries characterized by a high degree of global integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoorie, M. and P. Enderwick, “The International Operations of New Zealand Companies”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 9(1), 51–69, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., “Using an Ecological Perspective to Study Organizational Founding Rates”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 14(3), 7–24, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, S., “The Internationalization of the Firm from an Entrepreneurial Perspective”, International Studies of Management & Organization 30, 63–92, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamish, P. W., R. Craig, and K. McLellan, “The Performance Characteristics of Canadian versus U.K. Exporters in Small and Medium Sized Firms”, Management International Review 33, 121–137, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, R. P. and E. J. Zajac, “Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings”, Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 313–335, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggadike, E. R., Corporate Diversification: Entry, Strategy and Performance, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilkey, W. J., “Profitable Export Marketing Practices: An Exploratory Inquiry”. In J. Rosson and S. D. Reid (eds), Managing Export Entry and Expansion. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B., Entrepreneurial Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley, S. and D. Newborn, “Owners and Managers: The Venture 100 vs. the Fortune 500”, Journal of Business Venturing 2(4), 351–363, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J., H. J. Sapienza, and J. G. Almeida, “The Internationalization of New High-potential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20, 61–76, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, E. E. and D. W. Shafer, Pioneering New Products: A Market Survival Guide. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A., “What Do We Know About Exporting by Small Italian Manufacturing Firms?” Journal of International Marketing 1(3), 49–75, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi, A. and D. Dalli, “Internationalization Process and Entry Channels: Evidence from Small Italian Exporters”. In H. Muhlbacher and C. Jochum (eds), Advanced Research in Marketing. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the European Marketing Academy, Innsbruck, 1990.

  • Brokaw, L., “Foreign Affairs”, Inc. 92–104, (November 1990).

  • Broom, H. N., L. G. Longenecker, and C. W. Moore, Small Business Management. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern Publishing, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., Factors Motivating Small Companies to Internationalize: The Effect of Firm Age, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Boston University, 1992.

  • Buchele, R. B., Business Policy in Growing Firms. San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. and M. Casson, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. New York: Holmer and Meter, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgel, O. and G. C. Murray, “The International Market Entry Choices of Start-up Companies in High-technology Industries”, Journal of International Marketing 8, 33–62, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., T. G. Pollock, and M. M. Leary, “Testing a Model of Reasoned Risk-Taking: Governance, the Experience of Principals and Agents, and Global Strategy in High-Technology IPO Firms”, Strategic Management Journal, forthcoming.

  • Casson, M., “Transaction Costs and the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise”, In A. M. Rugman (ed.), New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. New York: St Martin's Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil, S. T. and J. Naor, “Firm Management Characteristics as Discriminators of Export Marketing Activity”, Journal of Business Research 15(3), 221–235, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T. and P. D. Grub, “Competitive Strategies of Taiwanese PC Firms in their Internationalization Process”, Journal of Global Marketing 6(3), 5–27, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., “Organization Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice”, Sociology 6, 2–22, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, T. and R. A. Lindberg, How Management is Different in Small Companies. New York: American Management Association, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. J., “A Resource-based Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings Industry”, Strategic Management Journal 12, 49–68, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., “Entrepreneurial Environment”, Industrial Research 12, 75, (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., “Strategic Management: New Ventures and Small Businesses”, Long Range Planning 14(5), 39–45, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C. and W. C. Dunkelberg, “Entrepreneurship and the Initial Size of Firms”, Strategic Management Journal 7, 53–68, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C., F. J. Gimeno-Gascon, and C. Y. Woo, “Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of Venture Performance”, Journal of Business Venturing 9, 371–395, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. and H. J. Munro, “Internationalizing the Entrepreneurial Technology-intensive Firm: Growth Through Linkage Development”, Paper Presented at the Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference. INSEAD, France, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E. and H. J. Munro, “Extending the Theories of Internationalization: International Growth Patterns of Small Software Firms”, Working Paper, (1994).

  • Cvar, M., “Competitive Strategics in Global Industries”, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Harvard Business School, (1984).

  • Dana, L.-P., H. Etemad, and R. W. Wright, “Theoretical Foundations of International Entrepreneurship”. In A. M. Rugman (Series ed.) and R. W. Wright (Volume ed.), Research in Global Strategic Management, Vol. 7, pp. 3–22. Stamford, CN: JAI Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S., S. Craig, and W. J. Keegan, “Approaches to Assessing International Marketing Opportunities for Small and Medium-sized Companies”, Columbia Journal of World Business 17(3), 26–32, (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., “The Determinants of International Production”, Oxford Economic Papers 25, 289–335, (November, 1973).

  • The Economist, Go West, Young Firm, pp. 88–89, (May 9, 1992).

  • The Economist, America's Little Fellows Surge Ahead, pp. 59–60, (July 3, 1993).

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. and C. B. Schoonhoven, “Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures”, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 504–529, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeser, H. R. and G. E. Willard, “Founding Strategy and Performance”, Strategic Management Journal 11, 87–98, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes, M. and R. Coombs, “The Coincidence of Technology and Market Objectives in the Internationalization of New Technology-based Firms”, International Small Business Journal 15, 14–35, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., “Global Strategy: An Organizing Framework”. Strategic Management Journal 8, 425–444, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, U., “Small Firms aren't Waiting to Grow up to go Global”, The Wall Street Journal, B2, (December 5, 1989).

  • Hambrick, D. C. and P. A. Mason, “Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers”, Academy of Management Review 9, 193–206, (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harveston, P. D., “Synoptic Versus Incremental Internationalization: An Examination of ‘Born Global’ and ‘Gradual Globalizing’ Firms”, Unpublished Dissertation, University of Memphis, (2000).

  • Hedlund, G., “The Hypermodern MNC—a Heterarchy”, Human Resource Management 25, 9–35, (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. H., The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and J.-E. Vahlne, “The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitment”, Journal of International Business Studies 4, 20–29, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, V. K., M. Alahunta, and J.-P. Jeannet, “Challenging the Incumbents: How High Technology Startups Compete Globally”, Journal of Strategic Change 1, 71–82, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, V. K., “Global Competitive Strategies”, In C. Snow (ed.), Strategy, Organization Design, and Human Resource Management, pp. 55–109. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak E., P. N. Ghuari, and T. Olofsson-Bredenlow, “Export Behavior of Small Swedish Firms”, Journal of Small Business Management 25, 26–32, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, Y., “Firm-specific Strategic Advantages and Foreign Direct Investment Behavior of Firms: The Case of Japanese Semi-conductor Firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, 20(2), 296–314, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuemmerle, W., “Home Base and Knowledge Management in International Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing 17, 99–122, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. G. and S. T. Cavusgil, “The Born Global Firm: A Challenge to Traditional Internationalization Theory”, Advances in International Marketing 8, 11–26, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S. J., “An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Global Integration”, Strategic Management Journal 12, 17–31, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, S. W., The Impact of Strategy and Industry Structure on New Venture Performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Georgia, 1991.

  • Lamont, L., “What Entrepreneurs Learn From Experience”, Journal of Small Business Management 12(4), 41, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecraw, D. J., “The Management of Countertrade: Factors Influencing Success”, Journal of International Business Studies 20(1), 41–59, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C. and D. L. Day, “Corporate Ventures into Industrial Markets: Dynamics of Aggressive Entry”, Journal of Business Venturing 2, 29–39, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, W. E. and W. A. Long, Developing New Ventures: the Entrepreneutial Option. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. K. and P. Servais, “The Internationalization of Born Globals: An Evolutionary Process”, International Business Review 6, 561–583, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamis, Robert A., “Global Start-up”, Inc., 38–47, (1989).

  • McAuley, A., “Entrepreneurial Instant Exporters in the Scottish Arts and Craft Sector”, Journal of International Marketing 7, 67–82, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., “International Versus Domestic Entrepreneurship: New Venture Strategic Behavior and Industry Structure”, Journal of Business Venturing 4, 387–399, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., S. Shane, and B. M. Oviatt, “Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research”, Journal of Business Venturing 9, 469–487, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P. and B. M. Oviatt, “International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths”, Academy of Management Journal 43, 902–908, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. E. and M. J. Dowling, “Using R&D Cooperative Arrangements to Leverage Managerial Experience: A Study of Technology-intensive New Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing 9, 33–48, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company, Emerging Exporters: Australia's High Value-Added Manufacturing Exporters. Melbourne: Australian Manufacturing Council, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. and B. Camp, “Exploring Determinants of Success in Corporate Ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing 1, 87–105, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montanari, J. R., “Managerial Discretion: An Expanded Model of Organization Choice”, Academy of Management Review 3, 231–241, (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Globalisation and Small and Medium Enterprises, Paris: OECD, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall, “Toward a Theory of International New Ventures”, Journal of International Business Studies 25(1), 45–64, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall, “Global Start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a Worldwide Stage”, Academy of Management Executive 9(2), 30–44, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M. and P. P. McDougall, “Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: The Case of International New Ventures”, Management International Review 37, 85–99, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugel, T. A., “The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: An Analysis of U.S. Manufacturing Industries”, Managerial and Decision Economics 2, 220–228, (June 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. M., Entrepreneurial Companies “Born” International: Four Case Studies, Presented at Babson Entrepreneurship Research Conference on Entrepreneurship, St Louis, IL, (1989).

  • Reynolds, P. and B. Miller, “New Firm Gestation: Conception, Birth, and Implications for Research”, Journal of Business Venturing 7, 405–417, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. C., Measures of Entrepreneurial Value Creation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Georgia, 1995.

  • Ronstadt, R. C., “The Corridor Principle”, Journal of Business Venturing 3(1), 31–40, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuber, A. R. and E. Fischer, “The Influence of the Management Team's International Experience on the Internationalization Behavior of SMEs”, Journal of International Business Studies 28(4), 807–825, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. P., Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, W. R., New Venture Performance. MA: Lexington Books, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, W. R. and C. W. Hofer, “Improving New Venture Performance: The Role of Strategy, Industry Structure, and the Entrepreneur”, Journal of Business Venturing 2(1), 5–28, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M. P. and J. W. Dean, Jr., “Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach”, Journal of Management 17(4), 681–700, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R. C., “Collaboration and Performance in Foreign Markets: The Case of Young High-technology Manufacturing Firms”, Academy of Management Journal 44, 45–60, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, R. C., B. M. Oviatt, and P. P. McDougall, “How New Ventures Exploit Trade-offs among International Risk Factors: Lessons for the Accelerated Internationalization of the 21st Century”, Academy of Management Journal 43, 1227–1248, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • The State of Small Business, Report from the U.S. Small Business Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, (1992).

  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Small and Medium-sized Transnational Corporation. New York: United Nations, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Direct Investment Abroad: 1989 Benchmark Survey Data. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Patent Office, Patenting Trends in the United States: 1963–1994. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R., “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190–207, (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K., New Venture Strategies, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, L. and R. Luostarinen, “Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept”, Journal of General Management 14(2), 34–55, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, M. F. and K. A. Bantel, “Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change”, Academy of Management Journal 35(1), 91–121, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. W. and D. A. Ricks, “Trends in International Business Research: Twenty-five Years Later”, Journal of International Business Studies 25, 687–701, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., R. D. Ireland, and M. A. Hitt, “International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance”, Academy of Management Journal 43, 925–950, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDougall, P.P., Oviatt, B.M. & Shrader, R.C. A Comparison of International and Domestic New Ventures. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1, 59–82 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023246622972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023246622972

Navigation