Skip to main content
Log in

A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few reports about methods of evaluating quality of life (QoL) among the thousands published since medical interest in the subject slowly began nearly 40 years ago are based upon theory. This paper, prepared in response to a request to furnish an exception (Meadows KA. Introduction to an Advanced Seminar: Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life. What can the Cognitive Sciences Contribute? Hull University, October 9, 2000) describes the origins of the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). This derives its cognitive aspects from theoretical studies of perception by Egon Brunswik, their extension to Social Judgment Theory (SJT) by Kenneth Hammond and the application of these ideas to QoL by the present authors and their colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joyce CRB, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM. Individual Quality of Life: Approaches to Conceptualisation and Assessment. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bullinger M. Cognitive theories and individual quality of life assessment (in ref. [2]).

  3. Joyce CRB, Caple G, Mason M, Reynolds E, Mathews JA. Quantitative study of doctor-patient communication. Quart J Med 1969; 38: 183–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balint M, Hunt J, Joyce CRB, Marinker M, Woodcock J. Treatment or Diagnosis: A Study of Repeat Prescriptions in General Practice. London: Tavistock, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hammond KR, Joyce CRB (eds). Psychoactive Drugs and Social Judgment. New York: Wiley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hammond KR, Stewart TR (eds). Egon Brunswik. Oxford: University Press, 2001 (see also Hammond KR. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncer-tainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brunswik E. Wahrnehmung und Gegenstandswelt. Grundlegung einer Psychologie vom Gegenstand her. Habilitationsschrift. Leipzig and Vienna: F Deuticke. See also: Fischer KR, Stadler F (eds), Wahrnehmung und Gegenstandswelt. 1934; Zum Lebenswerk von Egon Brunswik. Vienna: Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson D. New York Review of Books. Oct. 12, 1989; pp. 25–27.

  9. Larkin P. Required Writing. London: Faber and Faber, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bateson MC. Our Own Metaphor. New York: Knopf, 1972 (q by Aldridge D. Making and taking health care decisions. J Roy Soc Med 1990; 83: 720-723).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greer S. Can psychological therapy improve the quality of life of patients with cancer? Br J Cancer 1989; 59: 149–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. James W. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joyce CRB. Quality of Life: the state of the art in clinical assessment. In: Walker SW, Rosser RM (eds), QoL Assessment and Application, Lancaster: MTP Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strunk W, White EB. The Elements of Style. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steiner G. Real Presences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brunswik E. Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review 1943; 50: 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nagel E. The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hammond KR, McClelland GH, Mumpower J. Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures, 1990. New York: Praeger, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brunswik E. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewin K. A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See the web site of the Brunswik Society: http://www. brunswik.org.

  22. Arkes HR, Hammond KR. Judgment and Decision Making: An interdisciplinary reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harding REM. An anatomy of Inspiration. Appendix by Robert Nichols: The Birth of a Poem. 2nd ed. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hammond KR. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O'Boyle C, McGee HM, Hickey A, et al. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL): Administration Manual. Dublin: Department of Psychology Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Browne JP, O'Boyle CA, McGee HM, McDonald NJ, Joyce CRB. Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cooksey RW. Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Basho Matsuo. The Narrow Road to the Deep North. London: Penguin, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Joyce CRB. Is God a Placebo? In: J Schmidt (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd Einsiedeln Symposium, 1997. Res Comp Med 1999; 5(S1): 102–111

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joyce, C., Hickey, A., McGee, H. et al. A theory-based method for the evaluation of individual quality of life: The SEIQoL. Qual Life Res 12, 275–280 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023273117040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023273117040

Navigation