Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospect theory is an alternative theory of choice under conditions of risk, and deviates from expected utility theory by positing that people evaluate choices with respect to gains and losses from a reference point. They tend to overweight losses with respect to comparable gains and engage in risk-averse behavior with respect to gains and risk-acceptant behavior with respect to losses. They also respond to probabilities in a non-linear manner. I begin with an overview of prospect theory and some of the evidence upon which it is based, and then consider some of the implications of the theory for American politics, international relations, and the law. I end with a brief discussion of some of the conceptual and methodological problems confronting the application of prospect theory to the study of politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ali, M.: 1977, 'Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors', Journal of Political Economy 85, 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M.: 1953, 'Le Comportement de L'Homme Rationel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine', Econometrica 21, 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkes, H. R. and C. Blumer: 1985, 'The Psychology of Sunk Cost', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35, 124–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J.: 1982, 'Risk Perception in Psychology and Economics', Economic Inquiry 20, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, P. S.: 1979, The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battalio, R. C., J. H. Kagel and K. Jiranyakul: 1990, 'Testing between Alternative Models of Choice under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S.: 1968, 'Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach', Journal of Political Economy 76, 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. S. and H. D. Price: 1975, 'Voter Response to Short-Run Economic Conditions: The Asymmetric Effect of Prosperity and Recession', American Political Science Review 69, 1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettcher, W. A. III: 1995, 'Context, Methods, Numbers, and Words: Evaluating the Applicability of Prospect Theory to International Relations', Journal of Conflict Resolution 39, 561–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, B. F. J. and J. L. Knetsch: 1998, 'Tests of Market Outcomes with Asymmetric Valuations of Gains and Losses: Smaller Gains, Fewer Trades, and Less Value', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 33, 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. and J. Z. Rubin: 1985, Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, A. S.: 1987, Remedies for Torts and Breach of Contract, Butterworths, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F.: 1995, 'Individual Decision Making', in J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 587–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F.: 1997, 'Progress in Behavioral Game Theory', Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F.: 2000, 'Prospect Theory in theWild: Evidence from the Field', in D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H.: 1960, 'The Problem of Social Cost', Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. and J. L. Knetsch: 2000, 'Judicial Choice and Disparities between Measures of Economic Values', in D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (eds.), Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 424–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, R.: 1979, 'The Role of Ambiguity in Manipulating Voting Behavior', Theory and Decision 10, 265–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. C.: 1962, 'Toward a Theory of Revolution', American Sociological Review 27, 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James W., Jr.: 2000, Threats and Promises, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M. A.: 1979, 'Donative Promises', University of Chicago Law Review 47, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. S.: 1990, 'Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence', American Journal of Political Science 34, 373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnham, B.: 1994, Taking Risks/Avoiding Losses, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J. and D. Satz: 1995, 'Unification, Universalism, and Rational Choice Theory', Critical Review 9, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P.: 1981, Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geva, N., A. Astorino-Courtois and A. Mintz: 1996, 'Marketing the Peace Process in the Middle East: The Effectiveness of Thematic and Evaluative Framing in Jordan and Israel', in M. Chatterji, J. Fontanel and A. Hattori (eds.), Arms Spending, Development and Security, APH Publishing, New Delhi, pp. 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, T. R.: 1970, Why Men Rebel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, M. L.: 2001, 'Prospect Theory and the Cuban Missile Crisis', International Studies Quarterly 45, 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. S., M. J. Doane and C. K. Woo: 1991, 'Consumer Rationality and the Status Quo', Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W.: 1897, 'The Path of Law', Harvard Law Review 10, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriye, A.: 1987, The Origins of the Second World War, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R.: 1991, 'Domino beliefs and Strategic Behavior', in R. Jervis and J. Snyder (eds.), Dominoes and Bandwagons, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 20–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R.: 1992, 'Political Implications of Loss Aversion', Political Psychology 13, 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolls, C., C. R. Sunstein and R. H. Thaler: 2000, 'A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics', in C. R. Sunstein (ed.), Behavioral Law & Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 13–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H. and A. E. Roth (eds.): 1995, The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.: 1992, 'Reference Points, Anchors, Norms, and Mixed Feelings', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51, 296–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler: 1986, 'Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market', American Economic Review 76, 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler: 1990, 'Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem', Journal of Political Economy 98, 1325–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler: 1991, 'The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias', Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk', Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1992, 'Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (eds.): 2000, Choices, Values, and Frames, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, S.: 1977, 'Presidential Popularity and Negative Voting: An Alternative Explanation of the Midterm Congressional Decline of the President's Party', American Political Science Review 71, 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L. and J. A. Sinden: 1984, 'Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value', Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970, 'Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 91–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R.: 1985, 'Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior', American Journal of Political Science 29, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R. and J. S. Levy: 1998, 'Contributions of Behavioral Decision Theory to Research in Political Science', Applied Psychology: an International Review 47, 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. N. and J. G. Stein: 1987, 'Beyond Deterrence', Journal of Social Issues 43, 5–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, A. S. and G. Whyte: 1997, 'A Cross-Cultural Exploration of the Reference Dependence of Crucial Group Decisions under Ris', Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, 792–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S.: 1987, 'Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War', World Politics 40, 82–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S.: 1992, 'An Introduction to Prospect Theory', Political Psychology 13, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, Jack S.: 1997, 'Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations', International Studies Quarterly 41, 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S.: 2000, 'The Implications of Framing and Loss Aversion for International Conflict', in M. I. Midlarsky (ed.), Handbook of War Studies II, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 193–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S.: 2001, 'Explaining Events and Testing Theories: History, Political Science, and the Analysis of International Relations', in C. Elman and M. F. Elman (eds.), Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 39–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G. and R. Sugden: 1982, 'Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty', The Economic Journal 92, 805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, M. B., R. S. Erikson and J. A. Stimson: 1992, 'Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy', American Political Science Review 86, 597–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffery, E. J., D. J. Kahneman and M. L. Spitzer: 2000, 'Framing the Jury: Cognitive Perspectives on Pain and Suffering Awards', in C. R. Sunstein (ed.), Behavioral Law & Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 259–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R.: 1998, Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. 'Mutual Funds Report', The New York Times 10/10/99, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nincic, M.: 1997, 'Loss Aversion and the Domestic Context of Military Intervention', Political Research Quarterly 50, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M.: 1965, The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P.: 1996, 'The New Politics of the Welfare State', World Politics 48, 143–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A.: 1977, 'Gratuitous Promises in Economics and Law', Journal of Legal Studies 6, 411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, G. A. and A. Tversky: 1988, 'Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice', American Political Science Review 82, 719–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M.: 1993, 'Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics', American Economic Review 83, 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritov, I. and J. Baron: 1990, 'Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity', Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3, 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D.: 1984, 'Risk Aversion in Soviet Decisionmaking', in J. Valenta and W. Potter (eds.), Soviet Decisionmaking for National Security, Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B. M.: 1972, No Clear and Present Danger, Harper Torchbacks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W. and R. Zechhauser: 1988, 'Status Quo Bias in Decision Making', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 7–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabroeck, J. and E. Davis: 1994, 'Prospect Theory Predictions when Escalation is not the Only Chance to Recover Sunk Costs', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57, 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C.: 1966, Arms and Influence, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, R. L.: 1996, 'Neorealism's Status Quo Bias:What Security Dilemma?' Security Studies 5, 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafir, E., I. Simonson and A. Tversky: 1993, 'Reason-Based Choice', Cognition 49, 11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.: 1972, 'The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition', American Political Science Review 66, 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopher, B. and G. Gigliotti: 1993, 'A Test of Generalized Expected Utility Theory', Theory and Decision 35, 75–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. G.: 1985, 'Calculation, Miscalculation, and Conventional Deterrence, I: The View from Cairo', in R. Jervis, R. N. Lebow and J. G. Stein (eds.), Psychology and Deterrence, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 34–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. G.: 1991, 'The Arab-Israeli War of 1967: Inadvertent War Through Miscalculated Escalation', in A. L. George (ed.), Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management, Westview, Boulder, CO, pp. 126–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. G. and L. Pauly: 1992, Choosing to Cooperate: How States Avoid Loss, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R., D. Kahneman and D. Schkade: 2000, 'Assessing Punitive Damages (With Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law)', in C. R. Sunstein (ed.), Behavioral Law & Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 232–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (ed.): 2000, Behavioral Law & Economics, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, J. W.: 1998, 'Quagmires in the Periphery: Foreign Wars and Escalating Commitment in International Conflict', Security Studies 7, 94–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1986, 'Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions', Journal of Business 59, S251–S278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman: 1991, 'Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference dependent Model', Quarterly Journal of Economics 41, 1039–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and R. H. Thaler: 1990, 'Preference Reversals', Journal of Economic Perspectives 4, 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and I. Simonson.: 1993, 'Context-dependent Preferences', Management Science 39, 1179–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.: 1980, 'Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F. and T. A. Post: 1988, 'On the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems', in M. T. H. Glaser, R. Glaser and M. J. Farr (eds.), The Nature of Expertise, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. K.: 1986, 'The Politics of Blame Avoidance', Journal of Public Policy 6, 371–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K.: 1996, 'Risk Taking in Latin American Economic Restructuring: Lessons from Prospect Theory', International Studies Quarterly 40, 185–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakaria, F.: 2001, 'Is this the End of Inflation?' Newsweek, March 19.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, 89 George Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901-1411, U.S.A. Phone (work)

    Jack S. Levy

Authors
  1. Jack S. Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, J.S. Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science. Synthese 135, 215–241 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023413007698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023413007698

Keywords

Search

Navigation