Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supports and Concerns for Teacher Professional Growth During the Implementation of a Science Curriculum Innovation

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internationally, considerable reform in science education is occurring which promotes constructivist philosophies and advocates constructivist-inspired pedagogical strategies that are new to many teachers. This paper reports on the supporting factors necessary for teacher professional growth and the issues of concern that were evident during one primary teacher's successful implementation of a unit of work based on a draft of a new state-wide science syllabus which proposes such approaches. One researcher (CEP) provided guidance during the writing and implementation of the unit through professional development workshops complemented by ongoing collegial support. The analysis of the teacher's practice reveals that professional growth required a willingness of the teacher to engage with change and modify his professional practice. The support factors for teacher growth consisted of an appropriate program of professional development, teacher understanding of the elements of the curriculum innovation, and successful experiences in implementing new approaches. In contrast, the issues of concern were: the adequacy of support for planning including the time required to understand the innovation and make changes to teaching practice; science equipment; teacher knowledge; classroom management strategies; and ways to cope with change. Understanding of these support factors and issues of concern is vital for the successful implementation of science curriculum innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, K. (1997). Teaching science: Exploring the issues. Rockhampton, Qld: Central Queensland University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., & Asoko, H. (1996). A case study of a teachers's progress toward using a constructivist view of learning to inform teaching in elementary science. Science Education, 80(2), 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (2000). The development of pre-service elementary science teacher education in Australia. In S. K. Abel (Ed.), Science teacher education: An international perspective (pp. 9–29). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, K., & Symington, D. (1996). Changes in primary science over the past decade: Implications for the research community. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 299–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S., & Fleer, M. (1995). Science with reason. London: Hodder & Staughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (1994). Primary investigations. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering [ATSE]. (2002). The teaching of science and technology in Australian primary schools: A cause for concern. Parkville, Vic: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Science, Technology and EngineeringCouncil [ASTEC]. (1997). Foundations for Australia's future: Science and technology in primary schools. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. (1998). Teacher development in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Part 2, pp. 681–694). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellanca, J., & Fogarty, R. (1991). Blueprints for thinking in the co-operative classroom (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Vic: Hawker Brownlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, C., & Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collaboration across and within schools: Supporting individual change in elementary science teaching. Science Education, 81, 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burruss, J. D. (1997, March). Walking the talk: Implementation decisions made by teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Bybee, R. W., Buchwald, C., Crissman, S., Heil, D., Kuerbis, P., Matsmoto, C., & McInerney, J. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years: Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Andover, MA: The National Centre for Improving Science Education. (ERIC DocumentReproduction Service No. ED 314 237).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coble, C. R., & Koballa, T. R., Jr. (1996). Science education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 459–484). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, F. E., & Salyer, B. A. (1995). Origins of life science teachers' beliefs underlying curriculum reform in Texas. Science Education, 79(6), 611–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, and again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, C. M., Lumpe, A. T., & Haney, J. J. (1999). Science teachers' beliefs and intentions to implement thematic units. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(2), 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Queensland. (1981). Syllabus and guidelines for teachers of primary science. Brisbane, Qld: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment Education and Training [DEET]. (1989). The discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science (1). Report and recommendations. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (1997). Science is working out the world: A handbook of activities for children and teachers of early childhood science. Brisbane, Qld: Early Childhood Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J., Osborne, J., Fairbrother, R., & Kurina, L. (2000). A study into the professional views and needs of science teachers in primary and secondary schools in England. London: Council for Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989). Changing conceptions. In P. Adey (Ed.), Adolescent development and school science (pp. 79–99). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161).New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Part 2, pp. 1155–1173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on the curriculum (pp. 789–829). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (Eds.). (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (1991). Seeing the light [video]. Belconnen, ACT: Faculty of Education, University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1995). How to teach for metacognitive reflection. Melbourne, Vic: Hawker Brownlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, A. (1997). Teaching science to children: An inquiry approach (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1998). The meaning of educational change: A quarter of a century of learning. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Vol. 2, pp. 214–218). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Alaine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Cousins, J., & Kinnear, A. (1992). The reluctant primary school teacher. Research in Science Education, 22, 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: ACT Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. (1995). Constructivist learning and the teaching of science. In B. Hand & V. Prain (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science (pp. 3–20). Sydney, NSW: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E. (1992). The local educational change process and policy implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 877–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, B., & Prain, V. (1995). Introduction. In V. Prain & B. Hand (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science: The constructivist classroom (pp. ix–xv). Sydney, NSW: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), 971–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T., & Kirkwood, V. (1994). Towards creating effective learning environments for science teachers: The role of a science educator in the tertiary setting. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1998). Introduction: Pushing the boundaries of educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Vol. 2, pp. 281–294). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1994). From constructivism to social constructivism: A Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning. School Science Review, 79(289), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Hodson, J. (1998). Science as enculturation: Some implications for practice. School Science Review, 80(290), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1990). Using co-operative learning in math. In N. Davidson (Ed.), Co-operative learning in mathematics (pp. 103–125). Menlo Park, CA: AddisonWesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., & Boone, W. (2000). Strategies to improve student science learning: implications for science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 37(3), 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, R.W., Freeman, J. G., Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1998). Professional development of science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Part 2, pp. 667–680). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (1996). Ten myths of science: Re-examining what we think about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, D. C., Smith, D., & Johnson, V. G. (1990). Implementing conceptual change teaching in the primary school. The Elementary School Journal, 91(2), 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nias, J., Southworth, G., & Campbell, P. (1992). Whole school curriculum development in the primary school. London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, T. (1992). Inservice workshops that work for elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 422–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (1996). Primary science: Past and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 26, 99–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, C. (S.) E. (2001). Teacher professional growth during implementation of a science curriculum innovation. Unpublished masters thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1997). Science key learning area Years 1–10 syllabus-in-development May 1997. Brisbane, Qld: Queensland School Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1999a). Science Years 1 to 10 syllabus. Brisbane, Qld: Queensland School Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1999b). Science Years 1 to 10 sourcebook. Brisbane, Qld: Queensland School Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland School Curriculum Council. (1999c). Science initial in-service materials. Brisbane, Qld: Queensland School Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching primary science constructively. Marrickville, NSW: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupil's understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinthall, N. A., Reimann, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 666–703). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (1994).A longitudinal study of a constructivist approach to improving primary school teachers' subject matter knowledge in science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasker, R. (1992). Effective teaching: What can a constructivist view of learning offer? The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 38(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorley, N. R., & Stofflett, R. T. (1996). Representation of the conceptual change model in science teacher education. Science Education, 80(3), 317–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (1990). Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education. The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36(4), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Lorsbach, A. (1995). Toward a critical approach to the study of learning environments in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 25(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74(4), 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbull, D. (1990). Evolving conceptions of teaching: Reflections of one teacher. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(2), 161–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1998). The primary science teacher-leader project. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Constructivism as a scientific method. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction, of knowledge and teaching. Synthese, 60(1), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, J. J., Diezmann, C. M., & McRobbie C. J. (1997, October). Constructivism in practice: Fads, facts and fallacies? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Science Teachers Association of Queensland, Brisbane.

  • Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (1997). An in-depth study of a teacher engaged in an innovative primary science trial professional development project. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, G. H. (1991). Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Science Education, 75(1), 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1996). Learning theory and the science curriculum. In R. T. White (Ed.), Science years 7–10 symposium proceedings (pp. 42–44). Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland Studies Authority, Canada

    Cheryl (Shelley) E. Peers

  2. Queensland University of Technology, Canada

    Carmel M. Diezmann & James J. Watters

Authors
  1. Cheryl (Shelley) E. Peers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmel M. Diezmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James J. Watters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peers, C.(.E., Diezmann, C.M. & Watters, J.J. Supports and Concerns for Teacher Professional Growth During the Implementation of a Science Curriculum Innovation. Research in Science Education 33, 89–110 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023685113218

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023685113218

Search

Navigation