Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Comment: Qualitative Insight into Public Knowledge of, and Concern with, Biodiversity

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bord, R. J., O'Connor, R. E., and Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense doe the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science. 9: 205-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEA. (1999). State of Utah Long Term Economic and Demographic Projections, State of Utah Demographic and Economic Analysis Division. www.get.state.ut.us.

  • Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., and Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues. 56: 425-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebreo, A., Hershey, J., and Vinning, J. (1999). “Reducing solid waste: Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. ” Environment and Behavior. 31: 107-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamba, R. J. and Oskamp, S. (1994). “Factors influencing community residents' participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. ” Environment and Behavior. 26: 587-614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L. M., and Beal, J. (in press) “Using Social Science Data to Inform Conservation Policy: Population and Biodiversity in Utah. ” Human Dimensions of Wildlife.

  • IUCN-World Conservation Union (1996). IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals, IUCN-WCU, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S. K., and S. M., Marynowski. (1997). “Public attitudes and knowledge about ecosystem management on Department of Defense Lands in Florida. ” Conservation Biology. 11: 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1985a). “Attitudes toward Animals: Age-related Development Among Children. ” Journal of Environmental Education. 16: 29-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1985b). “Birdwatching in American Society. ” Leisure Sciences. 7: 343-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1993). “Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates. ” Conservation Biology 7: 845-855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1996). The Value of Life, Island Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. and Berry, J. K. (1987). “Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. ” Wildlife Society Bulletin. 15: 363-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W. (1991). “Lay Perspectives on global climate change. ” Global Environmental Change. June: 183-209.

  • Mankin, P. C., Warner, R. E., and Anderson, W. L. (1999). “Wildlife and the Illinois public: A benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. ” Wildlife Society Bulletin. 27: 465-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment. (1987). Technologies to Maintain Biological Diversity, OTA-F-330, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. C., Stegner, M. A. E., Steel, B. S., and Lovrich, N. P. (1992). “Citizens, Political Communications, and Interest Groups: Environmental Organizations in Canada and the United State, Praeger Press, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reading, R. P., Miller, B. J., and Kellert, S. R. (1999). “Values and attitudes toward prairie dogs. ” Anthrozoöos. 12: 43-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. J., Csuti, B., Jacobi, J. D., and Estes, J. E. (1987). “Species richness: A geographic approach to protecting future biological diversity. ” Bioscience. 37, 11:782-788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, T. D., Launer, A. E., Switky, K. R., and Ehrlich, P. (1994). “Identifying extinction threats. ” Bioscience. 44:692-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamm, K. R., Clark, F., and Eblacas, P. R. (2000). “Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: The case of global warming. ” Public Understanding of Science. 9: 219-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, S. (2000). Getting the science right, or introducing science in the first place? Local 'facts', global discourse—a desertification in the north–west Namibia. In Stott, P., and Sullivan, S. (eds.), Political Ecology: Science, Myth and Power, Arnold Publishers, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangley, L. (1997, May 26). “How much is a forest worth: Scientists put a price tag on Mother Nature. ” U.S. News & World Report. pp. 26: 60–61.

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001a). Population Change and Distribution, Census 2000 Brief, C2KBR-012, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (2001b). Census 2000 City Population Rank, State of Utah. Retrieved July 2001 from http://www.povemor.state.ut.us/dea/rankings/citv/00citypop.pdf.

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2000). “Federally listed animals and plants in Utah.” Retrieved May, 2000 from httn://www.r6.fws.pov/ut4.html.

  • Vandermeer, J., and Perfecto, I. (1995). Breakfast of Biodiversity: The Truth About Rain Forest Destruction, Institute for Food and Development Policy, Oakland, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1997). Biodiversity II, John Henry Press, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute (1994). World Resources 1994–1995: A Guide to the Global Environment, Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori M. Hunter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunter, L.M., Brehm, J. Brief Comment: Qualitative Insight into Public Knowledge of, and Concern with, Biodiversity. Human Ecology 31, 309–320 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023988914865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023988914865

Keywords

Navigation