Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization Methods for the Integration of DAE in the Presence of Redundant Constraints

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of multibody formulations based on Cartesian or naturalcoordinates lead to sets of differential-algebraic equations that haveto be solved. The difficulty in providing compatible initial positionsand velocities for a general spatial multibody model and the finiteprecision of such data result in initial errors that must be correctedduring the forward dynamic solution of the system equations of motion.As the position and velocity constraint equations are not explicitlyinvolved in the solution procedure, any integration error leads to theviolation of these equations in the long run. Another problem that isvery often impossible to avoid is the presence of redundant constraints.Even with no initial redundancy it is possible for some systems toachieve singular configurations in which kinematic constraints becometemporarily redundant. In this work several procedures to stabilize thesolution of the equations of motion and to handle redundant constraintsare revisited. The Baumgarte stabilization, augmented Lagrangian andcoordinate partitioning methods are discussed in terms of theirefficiency and computational costs. The LU factorization with fullpivoting of the Jacobian matrix directs the choice of the set ofindependent coordinates, required by the coordinate partitioning method.Even when no particular stabilization method is used, a Newton–Raphsoniterative procedure is still required in the initial time step tocorrect the initial positions and velocities, thus requiring theselection of the independent coordinates. However, this initialselection does not guarantee that during the motion of the system otherconstraints do not become redundant. Two procedures based on the singlevalue decomposition and Gram–Schmidt orthogonalization are revisited forthe purpose. The advantages and drawbacks of the different procedures,used separately or in conjunction with each other and theircomputational costs are finally discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nikravesh, P.E., Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petzold, L., Serban, R., Li, S., Raha, S. and Cao, Y., ‘Sensitivity analysis and design optimization of differential-algebraic equation systems’, in Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems with Large Rigid Body Motion, J. Ambrósio and M. Kleiber (eds.), IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001, 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wehage, R. and Haug, E., ‘Generalized coordinate partitioning of dimension reduction in analysis of constrained dynamic systems’, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 104, 1982, 247–255.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baumgarte, J., ‘Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion’, Conceptual Methods of Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1, 1972, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jalon, J. de and Bayo, E., Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arabyan, A. and Wu, F., ‘An improved formulation for constrained mechanical systems’, Multibody Systems Dynamics 2(1), 1998, 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S.S., Vanderploeg, M.J., ‘QR decomposition for state space representation of constrained mechanical dynamical systems’, ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 108, 1986, 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, R.P. and Likins, P.W., ‘Singular value decomposition for constrained dynamical systems’, Journal of Applied Mechanics 52, 1985, 943–948.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meijaard, J.P., ‘Applications of the single value decomposition in dynamics’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 103, 1993, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Udwadia, F.E. and Kalaba, R.E., Analytical Dynamics: A New Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pina, H.L.G., Métodos Numéricos (NumericalMethods), McGraw-Hill, Lisboa, Portugal, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neto, M.A., Ambrósio, J. Stabilization Methods for the Integration of DAE in the Presence of Redundant Constraints. Multibody System Dynamics 10, 81–105 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024567523268

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024567523268

Navigation