Abstract
Following on from work on stakeholder identification, this paper constructs a typology of stakeholder theories based on the extent to which serving the interests of non-shareholders relative to those of shareholders is accepted as a responsibility of companies. A typology based on the division of stakeholder theories into normative, descriptive, and instrumental is rejected on the grounds that the latter two designations refer to second order theories rather than divisions within stakeholder theory and the first is a designation which, for the purposes of business ethics, applies to all stakeholder theories. The crucial distinction between stockholder and stakeholder theory is argued to be their respective rejection and acceptance of role-specific responsibilities toward non-shareholders that are `ultimate objective fulfilling'. From this starting point, a typology is constructed using a division of stakeholder theories into those which do and do not give priority to the interests of shareholders over those of non-shareholders, do and do not posit perfect duties towards non-shareholders as well as shareholders, do and do not accept accountability to non-shareholders as well as shareholders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. F.: 1969, Conduct: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy (Macmillan, London).
Boatright, J. R.: 2000, Ethics and the Conduct of Business (3rd edition) (Prentice Hall, NJ).
Chryssides, G. D. and J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics (Chapman & Hall, London).
Cragg, W.: 2002, 'Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory', Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2), 113–142.
Donaldson, T. J. and L. E. Preston: 1994, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
Drake, S.: 1980, Galileo (O.U.P., Oxford).
Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1993, 'A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism', in G. D. Chryssides and J. H. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics (Chapman and Hall, London), pp. 254–266.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Marshfield).
Freeman, R. E.: 1994, 'The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409–421.
Freeman, R. E.: 1997, 'Stakeholder Theory', in P. H. Werhane and R. E. Freeman (eds.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Business Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford).
Friedman, M.: 1993, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', in G. D. Chryssides and J. H. Kaler, An Introduction to Business Ethics (Chapman and Hall, London), pp. 249–254.
Goodpaster, K. E.: 1991, 'Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis', Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–73.
Hendry, J.: 2001, 'Missing the Target: Normative Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Governance Debate', Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1), 159–176.
Kaler, J.: 1999, 'What's the Good of Ethical Theory?', Business Ethics: A European Review 8(4), 206–213.
Kaler, J.: 2000, 'Putting Ethical Theory in its Place', Business Ethics: A European Review 9(3), 211–217.
Kaler, J.: 2002a, 'Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification', Journal of Business Ethics 39(1–2), 91–99.
Kaler, J.: 2002b, 'Responsibility, Accountability, and Governance', Business Ethics: A European Review 11(4), 327–334.
Langtry, B.: 1994, 'Stakeholding and the Moral Responsibilities of Business', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 431–443.
Maitland, I.: 2001, 'Distributive Justice in Firms: Do the Rules of Corporate Governance Matter?', Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1), 129–143.
Marens, R. C. and A. D. Wicks: 2000, 'Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to Shareholders', in J. W. Dienhart (ed.), Business Institutions, and Ethics (O.U.P., NY).
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, 'Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining Who and What Really Counts', Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886.
Moore, G.: 1999, 'Tinged Shareholder Theory: Or What's so Special About Stakeholders?', Business Ethics: A European Review 8(2), 117–127.
O'Neill, O.: 1992, 'Duty and Obligation', in L. C. Becker and C. B. Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, vol. 1 (St. James Press, London), pp. 273–278.
Orts, E. W. and A. Strudler: 2002, 'The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory', Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2), 215–233.
Ryle, G.: 1963, The Concept of Mind (Penguin, Harmondsworth).
Smith, A.: 1991, The Wealth of Nations (Everyman, London).
Sternberg, E.: 1997, 'Stakeholder Theory: The Defective State It's In', in IEA, Stakeholding and its Critics (Institute of Economics Affairs, London), pp. 70–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaler, J. Differentiating Stakeholder Theories. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 71–83 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024794710899
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024794710899