Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualisation, Development and Validation of an Instrument for Investigating the Metacognitive Orientation of Science Classroom Learning Environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale – Science (MOLES-S)

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metacognition refers to an individual's knowledge, control and awareness of his/her learning processes. An important goal of education is to develop students as metacognitive, life-long learners. However, developing students' metacognition and evaluating whether classrooms are oriented to the development of students' metacognition are difficult and often time-consuming tasks. Further, no instruments that measure key dimensions related to classroom factors that specifically influence the development of students' metacognition have been available. This article describes the conceptualisation, design, and validation of an instrument for evaluating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments. The metacognitive orientation of a learning environment is the extent to which that environment supports the development and enhancement of students' metacognition. Social constructivism was the guiding referent informing the instrument's orientation and development. This instrument measures students' perceptions of the extent to which certain psychosocial dimensions, evident in learning environments where interventions have resulted in enhanced student metacognition, are evident in their science classrooms. Findings from the use of this instrument complement what is already known from research studies to be generally the case in relation to science classrooms' metacognitive orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 263–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., &; White, R. T. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., &; Mitchell, I. J. (1987). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study — The PEEL Project. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. R., &; Northfield, J. R. (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barell, J. (1991). Teaching for thoughtfulness. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorizing. Learning and Instruction, 6, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1976). Translation: Applications and research. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. Triandis &; J. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). London: Allyn &; Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., &; Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookover, W. B., Thomas, S., &; Paterson, A. (1964). Self-concept of ability and school achievement. Sociology of Education, 37, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of meta-cognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., &; Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26, 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. (1991). The school as home for the mind. Melbourne, Australia: Hawker Brownlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A., &; Lowery, L. F. (1989). Techniques for teaching thinking. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1988). CoRT thinking: Teacher's notes (Vols. 1, 2, 5). Sydney, Australia: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., &; Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., &; Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1990). Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1999). Using learning environment assessments to improve classroom and school climates. In J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 65–83). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., &; Fisher, D. L. (1986). Using short forms of classroom environment instruments to assess and improve classroom psychosocial environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J., Giddings, G. J., &; McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personal form of an instrument for assessing science laboratory classroom environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 399–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1992). Successful school improvement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Towards a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., &; Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., &; Chi, M. T. H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi &; M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxvii). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, &; R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its learning and teaching (pp. 131–146). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. F., &; Mitchell, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, &; J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 133–163). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. In D. J. Hacker, J. Donlosky, &; A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 1–26). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, B., Treagust, D. F., &; Vance, K. (1997). Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom. Science Education, 81, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1982). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of self-concept in children. In S. Suls &; A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3, pp. 136–182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1085–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S. (1998). Socioemotional aspects of students learning in a cognitive-apprenticeship environment. Instructional Science, 26, 439–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1990). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In J. W. Steigler, R. A. Schweder, &; G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology (pp. 259–286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., &; Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning — Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, I. (1990). Student awareness of learning. Unpublished MEdStudies Project, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman &; D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 52–82). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, C. J., &; Thomas, G. P. (2000). Changing the learning environment to enhance explaining and understanding in a Year 12 chemistry classroom. Learning Environments Research, 3, 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, C., &; Taylor, P. C. S. (1995). Metaphors as global markers for teachers' beliefs about the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 25, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall, G. (1999). Learning how to learn: The evolution of students' minds through social processes and culture of the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 139–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., &; Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child development, 55, 2083–2093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., &; Wixon, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., &; Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones &; L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., &; Nelson-Le Gall, S. (1997). Socializing intelligence. In L. Smith, J. Dockrell, &; P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond: Future issues for developmental psychology and education (pp. 145–158). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2000). Learning environments research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in practice. Learning Environments Research, 2, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudduck, J. (1999). Teacher practice and student voice. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen, &; W. Bünder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 41–54). Louvain, Belgium: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., &; Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, S. M. (1988). Helping children to reflect on their learning: An investigation of a teaching strategy designed to encourage young children to reflect on their learning. Unpublished MEd Studies, Project, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Tasker, R. (1981). Children's views and classroom experiences. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27(3), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. C. S., Fraser, B. J., &; White, L. R. (1994, April). CLES: An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Thomas, G. P. (1992). An investigation into the transfer of cognitive strategies. Unpublished MEd Studies, Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Thomas, G. P. (1999a). Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in enhancing students' learning processes. Research in Science Education, 29, 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (1999b). Developing metacognition and cognitive strategies through the use of metaphor in a Year 11 chemistry classroom. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P. (2002). The social mediation of metacognition. In D. McInerny &; S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 225–247). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. P., &; McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students' metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 222–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., &; Perkins, D. N. (1997). The language of thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 368–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (Ed.). (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., &; Gallagher, J. J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 549–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., &; Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1988). Metacognition. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement (pp. 70–75). Sydney, Australia: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (1992). Implications of recent research on learning for curriculum and assessment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24, 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T., &; Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the quality of learning. Studies in Science Education, 23, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, G.P. Conceptualisation, Development and Validation of an Instrument for Investigating the Metacognitive Orientation of Science Classroom Learning Environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale – Science (MOLES-S). Learning Environments Research 6, 175–197 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024943103341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024943103341

Navigation