Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal Insurance With Divergent Beliefs About Insurer Total Default Risk

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends the classic expected utility theory analysis of optimal insurance contracting to the case where the insurer has a positive probability of total default and the buyer and insurer have divergent beliefs about this probability. The optimal marginal indemnity above the deductible is smaller (greater) than one if the buyer's assessment of default risk is more pessimistic (optimistic) than the insurer's. As an application of the model, we consider the market for reinsurance against catastrophic property loss and propose an expected utility theory explanation for the increasing and concave marginal indemnity schedule observed in this market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applied Insurance Research. (1998). Projected Insured Losses from Natural Disasters. Boston.

  • Arrow, Kenneth. (1963). "Uncertainty and theWelfare Economics of Medical Care," American Economic Review 53, 941–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. David, Neil Doherty, and Anita Lo. (2002). "Can Insurers Pay for the "Big One"? Measuring the Capacity of the Insurance Market to Respond to Catastrophic Losses," Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 557–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. David, Martin F. Grace, and Richard D. Phillips. (1999). "Regulatory Solvency Prediction in Property-Liability Insurance: Risk-based Capital, Audit Ratios, And Cash Flow Simulation," Journal of Risk and Insurance 66, 417–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. David, D. Lalonde, and Richard D. Phillips. (2002). "Managing Risk Using Index-Linked Catastrophic Loss Securities." In M. Lane (ed.), Alternative Risk Strategies. London: Risk Books, pp. 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. David, Christopher M. Lewis, and Richard D. Phillips. (1999). "Pricing Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contracts Against Catastrophic Loss." In Kenneth A. Froot (ed.), The Financing of Catastrophe Risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 93–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. David and Mary A. Weiss. (2000). "The Global Market for Reinsurance: Consolidation, Capacity, and Efficiency," Brookzings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services 2000, 159–209.

  • Cummins, J. David and Olivier Mahul. (2000). "Managing Catastrophic Risk With Insurance Contracts Subject to Default Risk," NBER Insurance Project Workshop, February 25–26, 2000, Cambridge, MA.

  • Doherty, Neil. (1997). "Financial Innovation in the Management of Catastrophic Risk," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 10, 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Neil and Georges Dionne. (1993). "Insurance with Undiversifiable Risk: Contract Structure and Organizational Form of Insurance Firms," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6, 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Neil and Harris Schlesinger. (1990). "Rational Insurance Purchasing: Consideration of Contract Nonperformance," Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Neil, and Harry Schlesinger. (2002). "Insurance Contracts and Securitization," Journal of Risk and Insurance 69, 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, Jacques. (1987). Essays on Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot, Kenneth. (2001). "The Market for Catastrophe Risk: A Clinical Examination," Journal of Financial Economics 60, 529–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot, Kenneth, David Scharfstein, and Jeremy Stein. (1993). "Risk Management: Coordinating Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions," Journal of Finance 48, 1629–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, Christian. (1992). "Economic Theory of Risk Exchanges: A Review." In Georges Dionne (ed.), Contributions to Insurance Economics. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, Christian. (2000). "Optimal Insurance Design: What CanWe DoWith andWithout Expected Utility?" In Georges Dionne (ed.), Handbook of insurance. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Bruce. C. and Joseph E. Stiglitz. (1993). "Financial Market Imperfections and Business Cycles," Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, Darrell M. and Thomas Russell. (1997). "Catastrophe Insurance, Capital Markets, and Uninsurable Risks," Journal of Risk and Insurance 64, 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Herb, and Rene Stulz. (1987). "The Pricing of Options with Default Risk," Journal of Finance 42, 2267–2280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, Miles S. (1990). "Precautionary Savings in the Small and in the Large," Econometrica 58, 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, Stuart, Harry Panjer, and Gordon Willmot. (1998). Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. New-York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, John. (1992). "Optimum Insurance with Deviant Beliefs." In Georges Dionne (ed.), Contributions to insurance economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossin, Jan. (1968). "Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing," Journal of Political Economy 79, 553–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raviv, Arthur. (1979). "The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy," American Economic Review 69, 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, Harris. (2000). "The Theory of Insurance Demand." In G. Dionne (ed.), Handbook of Insurance, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 131–151.

  • Smith, Clifford W. and Rene Stulz. (1985). "The Determinants of Firms' Hedging Policies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 391–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero, C., Y. Kahane, and L. Jacque. (1986). "Insurance Premiums and Default Risk in Mutual Insurance," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 82–97.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Mahul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cummins, J.D., Mahul, O. Optimal Insurance With Divergent Beliefs About Insurer Total Default Risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27, 121–138 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025680924004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025680924004

Navigation