Skip to main content
Log in

Exact Solutions of Some Nonconvex Quadratic Optimization Problems via SDP and SOCP Relaxations

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that SDP (semidefinite programming) and SOCP (second order cone programming) relaxations provide exact optimal solutions for a class of nonconvex quadratic optimization problems. It is a generalization of the results by S. Zhang for a subclass of quadratic maximization problems that have nonnegative off-diagonal coefficient matrices of quadratic objective functions and diagonal coefficient matrices of quadratic constraint functions. A new SOCP relaxation is proposed for the class of nonconvex quadratic optimization problems by extracting valid quadratic inequalities for positive semidefinite cones. Its effectiveness to obtain optimal values is shown to be the same as the SDP relaxation theoretically. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate that the SOCP relaxation is much more efficient than the SDP relaxation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Fujisawa, M. Kojima, K. Nakata, and M. Yamashita, SDPA (SemiDefinite Programming Algorithm) user's manual—Version 6.0, Research Report B-308, Dept. of Mathematical and Computing Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-Okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan, 1995. Revised July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.X. Goemans and D.P. Williamson, “Improved approximation algorithms for maximum cut and satisfiability problems using semidefinite programming,” Journal of Assoc. Comput. Mach., vol. 42, pp. 1115-1145, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Kim and M. Kojima, “Second order cone programming relaxations of quadratic optimization problems,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 15, pp. 201-224, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Lováasz and A. Schrijver, “Cones of matrices and set functions and 0-1 optimization,” SIAM J. on Optimization, vol. 1, pp. 166-190, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Muramatsu and T. Suzuki, “A new second order cone programming relaxation for max-cut problems,” J. of Operation Research Society of Japan, vol. 46, pp. 164-177, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu. E. Nesterov, “Semidefinite relaxation and nonconvex quadratic optimization,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 9, pp. 141-160, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu. E. Nesterov, “Global quadratic optimization via conic optimization,” Working paper, CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, November, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. F.J. Sturm, “Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 11/12, pp. 625-653, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Toh, M.J. Todd, and R.H. Tütüntü, SDPT3—aMATLAB software package for semidefinite programming,” Dept. of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Ye, “Approximating quadratic programming with bound and quadratic constraints,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 84, pp. 219-226, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Zhang, “Quadratic optimization and semidefinite relaxation,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 87, pp. 453-465, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S., Kojima, M. Exact Solutions of Some Nonconvex Quadratic Optimization Problems via SDP and SOCP Relaxations. Computational Optimization and Applications 26, 143–154 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025794313696

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025794313696

Navigation