Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to assess whether manipulation of variables related to motivation and attention in children with autism would influence performance on standardized tests. Two different testing conditions were compared: One consisted of the usual standardized testing procedures; during the other, specific variables that were hypothesized to relate to each child's responsiveness to task stimuli were manipulated. Data were collected in the context of a repeated reversals experimental design with condition order varied within and across children. Six children participated in a total of 44 separate testing sessions, controlled for order of conditions, number of sessions, and type of test. Results showed consistent differences between the two conditions, suggesting that improving motivation and attention in children with autism may considerably influence test performance and interpretation. Findings are discussed in relation to the difficulty in administering and interpreting changes in performance on standardized tests with this population.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Berliner, D. C. (1988). Meta-comments: A discussion of critiques of L. M. Dunn's monograph “Bilingual Hispanic children on the U.S. mainland.” Special Issue: Achievement testing: Science vs. ideology. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10, 273–299.
California Association of School Psychologists. (1987). Documentation and recommendations. Millbrae, CA: Author.
Carr, M., Borkowski, J. G., & Maxwell, S. E. (1991). Motivational components of under-achievement. Developmental Psychology, 27, 108–118.
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Pictures Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Farb, J., Cottrell, A. W., Montague, J. C, & Throne, J. M. (1977). Update on research into increasing intelligence levels of the mentally retarded. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Research to practice in mental retardation: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency (Vol. 2, pp. 129–136).
Foster, R., Giddan, J. J., & Stark, J. (1973). Assessment of Children's Language Comprehension. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Fuchs, L. S. (1993). Enhancing instructional programming and student achievement with curriculum based measurement. In J. Kramer (Ed.), Curriculum based assessment: Examining old problems, evaluating new solutions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Good, R. H., & Salvia, J. (1988). Curriculum bias in published, norm-referenced reading tests: Demonstrable effects. School Psychology Review, 17, 51–60.
Homer, R. H., Dunlap, G., & Koegel, R. L. (Eds.). (1988). Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Koegel, L. K., & Koegel, R. L. (1995). Motivating communication in children with autism. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and Cognition in Autism. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Koegel, L. K., Valdez-Menchaca, M., & Koegel, R. L. (1993). Autism: A discussion from a social communication perspective. In V. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Advanced abnormal psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). Generalization issues in the treatment of autism. Seminars in Speech and Language, 8, 241–256.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Schreibman, L. (1991). Assessing and training parents in teaching pivotal behaviors. In R. Prinz (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children and families. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Koegel, R. L., & Mentis, M. (1985). Motivation in childhood autism: Can they or won't they? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 185–191.
Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C., & Dunlap, G. (1988). Producing speech use in nonverbal autistic children by reinforcing attempts. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 525–538.
Koegel, R. L., O'Dell, M. C, & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for teaching non-verbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–199.
Lambert, N. M. (1981). The clinical validity of the process for assessment of effective student functioning. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 323–334.
Leiter, R. G. (1979). Leiter International Performance Scale: Instruction manual. Chicago: Stoelting.
Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.
Lovaas, O. K., Koegel, R. L., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on autistic children in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 131–166.
Mittler, (1966). Psychological assessment. In J. K. Wing (Ed.), Early childhood autism: Clinical, educational, and social aspects. London: Pergamon.
Norris, M. K., Juarez, M. J., & Perkins, M. N. (1989). Adaptation of a screening test for bilingual and bidialectal populations. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 20, 381–390.
Rothman, R. W., & Cohen, J. (1988). Teaching test taking skills. Academic Therapy, 23, 341–348.
Ryan, E. B., Short, E. J., & Weed, K. A. (1986). The role of strategy training in improving the academic performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 521–529.
Seligman, M. E. P., Klein, D. C, & Miller, W. R. (1976). Depression. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of behavior modification. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Riverside, CA: Riverside.
Throne, J. M., & Farb, J. (1977). A functional approach to diagnosis in mental retardation. In J. S. Martois (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference and Exhibition on Evaluation and Measurement: Office of the Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools and the Los Angeles County Board of Education (pp. 161–198). Downey, CA: OLACSS-LACBE.
Torgesen, J. K., & Licht, B. G. (1983). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Retrospect and prospects. In J. D. McKiney & L. Teagans (Eds.), Current topics and learning disabilities (pp. 3–31). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Turnbull, H. R., III. (1993). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities. Denver, CO: Love.
Williams, T. S. (1983). Some issues in the standardized testing of minority students. Journal of Education, 165, 192–208.
Zigler, E., Abelson, W. D., Trickett, P. K., & Seitz, V. (1982). Is an intervention program necessary in order to improve economically disadvantaged children's IQ scores? Child Development, 53, 340–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koegel, L.K., Koegel, R.L. & Smith, A. Variables Related to Differences in Standardized Test Outcomes for Children with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 27, 233–243 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025894213424
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025894213424