Skip to main content
Log in

Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many commentators analyse green consumption as if it were an expression of individual environmental commitment. Such approaches suppose that the adoption of more sustainable ways of life depends upon the diffusion of "green" beliefs and actions through society. In this article, the author explores the idea that patterns of resource consumption (especially of energy and water) reflect what are generally inconspicuous routines and habits. Are such conventions evolving or standardising in ways that are increasingly resource intensive? In addressing this question with reference to three domains of daily life: comfort, cleanliness, and convenience, four simple models of change are outlined, two of which imply an inexorable escalation of resource consumption, two of which do not. The purpose of this illustrative exercise is to demonstrate the importance of understanding the systemic redefinition of "normal practice." Rather than taking individual behaviour to be the central unit of analysis, the case is made for an approach that concentrates on the construction and transformation of collective convention. This theoretical reorientation opens the way for programmes of research and policy informed by an appreciation of the technological and the commercial as well as the symbolic and cultural dimensions of more and less resource-intensive ways of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Albaum, M. (1997). Das Kundenbuch. Menschen und ihr Einkaufsverhalten bei Bekleidung. Frankfurt/Main: Deutscher Fachverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. (Ed.) (1990). Concise Oxford dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermeyer, P. (2001). Coming changes in the U.S. clothes washer market. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. (1997). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, M. (2000). Clothing care function: Germany, SusHouse Project final report. Delft: Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Technology Policy and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of judgement and taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brager, G., & de Dear, R. (2000). A standard for natural ventilation. ASHRAE Journal, October, pp. 21-27.

  • Consumers Union (1950). Washing machines. Consumer Reports, June, pp. 258-263.

  • Cooper, G. (1998). Air conditioning America: Engineers and the controlled environment, 1900–1960. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. (1983). More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. (2001). The invention of comfort. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (1999). Tumble dryers in the UK. Reference Number: wttd4031; Issue Date: 11 November, 1999. Available at: http://www.mtprog.com/wet/tumble/index.html (01.05.02).

  • DEFRA (2000). Washing machines in the United Kingdom: A sector review paper on projected energy consumption for the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. WTWM4031, October 2000. Available at: http://www.mtprog. com/wet/wash_mach/wtwmdown4031.pdf (14.4.02).

  • Douglas, M. (1984). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency (2001). Environment information. Available at: http://www. environment-agency.tv/nwdmc/being_water_wise_home/index.htm (14.04.02).

  • Fanger, O. (1970). Thermal comfort-Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B., & Leopold, E. (1993). The world of consumption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forty, A. (1986). Objects of desire: Design and society since 1750. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (1998). The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review, 14, 69-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, S. (1999). Nylon: The manmade fashion revolution. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M. (1995). Thermal comfort temperatures and the habits of Hobbits. In: F. Nicol, M. Humphreys, O. Sykes, & S. Roaf (Eds), Standards for thermal comfort, pp. 3-14. London: E & F N Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J. C. (1998). Dirty linen: Couples and their laundry. London: Middlesex University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leete, L., & Schor, J. (1994). Assessing the time-squeeze hypothesis: Hours worked in the United States 1969–1989. Industrial Relations, 33, 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, E., & Miller, J. (1992). The bathroom, the kitchen and the aesthetics of waste: A process of elimination. New York: Kiosk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. (1999). Domestic goods: The material, the moral, and the economic in the postwar years. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumbing and Mechanical (1994). The stand-up bath. Available at: http://www. theplumber.com/standup.html (12.04.02).

  • Rip, A., & Groen, A. (2001). Many visible hands. In: R. Coombs, K. Green, V. Walsh, & A. Richards (Eds.), Technology and the market: Demands, users and innovation, pp. 12-37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In: S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: Resources and technology, Volume 2, pp. 327-392. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life: The surprising ways that Americans use their time. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sams, P. (2001). Clothes care-Sending the right signals. Paper given at the International Appliance Technical Conference, Columbus, Ohio, March 27.

  • Schor, J. (1992). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot, J., Hoogma, R., & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: The case of the automobile system. Futures, 26, 1060-1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, D. (2001). Squeezing time: Allocating practices, co-ordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society, 12, 5-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southerton, D., Shove, E., & Warde, A. (2001). Harried and hurried: Time shortage and co-ordination of everyday life. Manchester: The University of Manchester and UMIST. CRIC Discussion Paper No. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaargaren, G. (1997). The ecological modernisation of production and consumption: Essays in environmental sociology. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Landbouw Universitiet Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (1996). Caring consumers: Gendered consumption meanings and the juggling lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 388-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigarello, G. (1998). Concepts of cleanliness: Changing attitudes in France since the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (1999). Convenient food: Space and timing. British Food Journal, 101, 518-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A., Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (1998). Convenience, schedules and sustainability. Paper given at the European Science Foundation Workshop on Consumption, Everyday Life and Sustainability, Lancaster University, 27–29 March. Available at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/esf/convenience.htm.

  • Yorkshire Water (2001). Latest news. Ref: NR105/2001. Date 18.05.01. http://www.yorkshirewater.com/search/results.htm?news/top.htm&http://www.yorkshirewater.com/news/nr105_01.htm (accessed on 01.05.02).

  • Zerubavel, E. (1979). Patterns of time in hospital life. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1985). The seven day circle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shove, E. Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy 26, 395–418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362829781

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026362829781

Keywords

Navigation