Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utility of Remote Sensing in Predicting Crop and Soil Characteristics

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Remote sensing during the production season can provide visual indications of crop growth along with the geographic locations of those areas. A grid coordinate system was used to sample cotton and soybean fields to determine the relationship between spectral radiance, soil parameters, and cotton and soybean yield. During the 2 years of this study, mid- to late-season correlation coefficients between spectral radiance and yield generally ranged from 0.52 to 0.87. These correlation coefficients were obtained using the green–red ratio and a vegetation index similar to the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) using the green and red bands. After 102 days after planting (DAP), the ratio vegetation index (RVI), difference vegetation index (DVI), NDVI, and soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) generally provided correlation coefficients from 0.54 to 0.87. Correlation coefficients for cotton plant height measurements taken 57 and 66 DAP during 2000 ranged from 0.51 to 0.76 for all bands, ratios, and indices examined, with the exception of Band 4 (720 nm). The most consistent correlation coefficients for soybean yield were obtained 89–93 DAP, corresponding to peak vegetative production and early pod set, using RVI, DVI, NDVI, and SAVI. Correlation coefficients generally ranged from 0.52 to 0.86. When the topographic features and soil nutrient data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA), the interaction between the crop canopy, topographic features, and soil parameters captured in the imagery allowed the formation of predictive models, indicating soil factors were influencing crop growth and could be observed by the imagery. The optimum time during 1999 and 2000 for explaining the largest amount of variability for cotton growth occurred during the period from first bloom to first open boll, with R values ranging from 0.28 to 0.70. When the PCA-stepwise regression analysis was performed on the soybean fields, R 2 values were obtained ranging from 0.43 to 0.82, 15 DAP, and ranged from 0.27 to 0.78, 55–130 DAP. The use of individual bands located in the green, red, and NIR, ratios such as RVI and DVI, indices such as NDVI, and stepwise regression procedures performed on the cotton and soybean fields performed well during the cotton and soybean production season, though none of these single bands, ratios, or indices was consistent in the ability to correlate well with crop and soil characteristics over multiple dates within a production season. More research needs to be conducted to determine whether a certain image analysis method will be needed on a field-by-field basis, or whether multiple analysis procedures will need to be performed for each imagery date in order to provide reliable estimates of crop and soil characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addiscott, T. M. and Wagenet, R. J. 1985. A simple method for combining soil properties that show variability. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 1365-1369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baret, F., Guyot, G. and Major, D. J. 1989. TSAVI: A vegetation index which minimizes soil brightness effects on LAI and APAR estimation. In: Proceedings of the 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing (IGARR'90. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10–14 July) 3, 1355-1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazquez, C. H. and Edwards, G. J. 1986. Spectral reflectance of healthy and diseased watermelon leaves. Annals of Applied Biology 108, 243-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, B. L. and O'Connell, R. T. 1990. Linear Statistical Models. An Applied Approach, 2nd edn. (PWS-Kent Publishing Co., Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, S. A. and Hanks, R. J. 1965. Reflection of radiant energy from soils. Soil Science 100, 130-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, P., Brisco, B. and Hirose, T. 2000. Remote sensing for improving crop management. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Geospatial Info. in Agriculture and Forestry (Lake Buena Vista, FL, Jan. 10–12), pp. II-487-II-494.

  • Buscaglia, H. J. and Varco, J. J. 1999. Utilization of spectral reflectance to evaluate N and K nutrition in cotton. 1999. In: Agronomy Abstract (ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, WI), p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, R. and Seal, M. R. 2000. Patterns among seeding rates, normalized difference vegetation index, and yield on a Mississippi cotton farm. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Geospatial Info. in Agriculture and Forestry (Lake Buena Vista, FL, Jan. 10–12), pp. I-232-I-239.

  • Carlson, T. N. and Ripley, D. A. 1997. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sensing Environment 62, 241-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. E., Yarger, D. N. and Shaw, R. H. 1971. Factors affecting the spectral properties of leaves with special emphasis on leaf water status. Agronomy Journal 63, 486-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, J. E. 1974. Vegetation canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 3, 175-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. P. 1984. Effects of cultural and environmental factors on corn and soybean spectral development patterns. Remote Sensing of Environment 14, 3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, J. K., Campanella, R. Seal, M. R., Willers, J. L. and Hood, K. B. 2000. Spatially variable insecticide applications through remote sensing. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (San Antonio, TX, Jan. 4–8), pp. 426-429.

  • Elvidge, C. D. and Chen, Z. 1995. Comparison of broad-band and narrow-band red and near-infrared vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 54, 38-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G. J., Maas, S. J. and DeTar, W. R. 2000. Early detection of spider mites in cotton using multispectral remote sensing. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (San Antonio, TX, Jan. 4–8), pp. 1022-1024.

  • Forcella, F. 1993. Value of managing within-field variability. In: Soil Specific Crop Management (ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, WI), pp. 125-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W. G. and Myers, V. I. 1968. Infrared aerial color photography for the detection of population of brown soft scale on citrus groves. Journal of Economic Entomology 61, 617-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald, C. M., Thames, W. H. and Wiegand, C. L. 1972. Detection of Rotylenchus reniformis infestations by aerial infrared photography. Journal of Nematology 4, 298-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, J. R. 1966. Path of heavy rainfall photographed from space. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 47, 371-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R. 1987. Soil-dependent spectral response in a developing plant canopy. Agronomy Journal 79, 61-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R. 1988. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 17, 37-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. R., Jackson, R. D. and Post, D. F. 1985. Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds. Remote Sensing of Environment 17, 37-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso, B., Pinter, P. J. Jr., Jackson, R. D. and Reginato, R. J. 1980. Estimation of grain yields by remote sensing of crop senescence rates. Remote Sensing of Environment 9, 87-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. D., Jones, C. A., Uehara, G. and Santo, L. T. 1980. Remote detection of nutrient and water deficiency in sugarcane under variable cloudiness. Remote Sensing of Environment 11, 327-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. D., Slater, P. N. and Pinter, P. J. Jr., 1983. Discrimination of growth and water stress in wheat by various vegetation indices through clear and turbid atmosphere. Remote Sensing of Environment 13, 187-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C. F. 1969. Derivation of leaf area index form quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology 50, 663-666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lough, J. L. 2000. Effects of varying nitrogen and potassium nutrition on spectral reflectance and physiological properties of cotton. M.S. Thesis., Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, D. J., Baret, F. and Guyot, G. 1990. A ratio vegetation index adjusted for soil brightness. International Journal of Remote Sensing 11, 727-740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallarino, A. P., Oyarzabal, E. S. and Hinz, F. N. 1999. Interpreting within-field relationships between crop yields and plant variables using factor analysis. Precision Agriculture 1, 15-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzer, F. E. and Cooper, G. R. 1967. Aerial photographic methods of potato disease detection. Maine Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin 646, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medlin, C. R., Shaw, D. R. Gerard, P. D. and LaMastus, F. E. 2000. Using remote sensing to detect weed infestations in Glycine max. Weed Science 48, 393-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges, R. M., Nixon, P. R. and Richardson, A. J. 1985. Light reflectance and remote sensing of weeds in agronomic and horticultural crops. Weed Science 33, 569-581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, D. C., Nolan, S. C., McKenzie, R. C., Goddard, T. W. and Kryzanowski, L. 1996. Yield and nutrient mapping for site specific fertilizer management. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis 27, 1265-1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuelas, J., Gamon, J. A., Fredeen, A. L., Merino, J. and Field, C. B. 1994. Reflectance indices associated with physiological changes in nitrogen-and water-limited sunflower leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment 48, 135-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettiet, J. V. 1973. An evaluation of potassium fertilizer needs for cotton in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bullettin 66 (Mississippi State University, Mississippi, MS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettry, D. E., 1983. Soils on the black belt branch station of the Mississippi agricultural and forestry experiment station. Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station.

  • Planet, W. G. 1970. Some comments on reflectance measurements of wet soils. Remote Sensing of Environment 1: 127-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, R. E. and Munk, D. S. 1998. Application of remote sensing to irrigation management in California cotton. In: International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Fourth (St. Paul, MN, July 19–22) (ASA/CSSA/SSSA Madison, WI: ASA-CSSA-SSSA), pp. 1511-1521.

  • Richardson, A. J. and Wiegand, C. L. 1977. Distinguishing vegetation from soil background information. Photogramm. Engineering Remote Sensing 43, 1541-1552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A. and Deering, D. W. 1973. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. In: ERTS Symposium, Third (NASA SP-351 Washington, DC) 1, 309-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, G. R., Svits, G. H. and Ellingboe, A. H. 1972. Spectral reflectance and transmittance of corn leaves infected with Helminthosporium maydis. Phytopathology 62, 1210-1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenrath-Cole, G. F., Hood, K. B., Alarcon, V. J., Olson, R., Tarpley, L., Varco, J. and Seal, M. 1998. Remote sensing of crop physiological function: Applications for development of variable rate inputs. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Geospatial Information in Agriculture and Forestry (Lake Buena Vista, FL, June 1–3), pp. II-604-II-608.

  • Shibayama, R. and Akiyama, T. 1991. Estimating grain yield of maturing rice canopies using high spectral resolution reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment 36, 45-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudbrink, Jr., D. L., Harris, F. A., Robbins, J. T. Snodgrass, G. L. and Thomson, S. J. 2000. Remote sensing of late-season pest damage to cotton & wild host plants of tarnished plant bug in the Mississippi Delta. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (San Antonio, TX. Jan. 4–8), pp. 1220-1223.

  • Thenkabail, P. S., Ward, A. D. and Lyon, J. G. 1995. Landsat-5 thematic mapper models of soybean and corn crop characteristics. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15, 49-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thenkabail, P. S., Smith, R. B. and Pauw, E. D. 2000. Hyperspectral vegetation indices and their relationships with agricultural crop characteristics. Remote Sensing of Environment 71, 158-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. R., Wiegand, C. L. and Myers, V. I. 1967. Reflectance of cotton leaves and its relation to yield. Agronomy Journal 59, 551-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomasson, J. A., Chen, J., Wooten, J. R., Shearer, S. A. and Pennington, D. A. 2000. Cotton yield prediction improvement with remote sensing. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference (San Antonio, TX. Jan. 4–8), pp. 419-421.

  • Thompson, W. and Robert, P. C. 1994. Valuation of mapping strategies for variable rate applications. In Proceedings of the Site-Specific Management for Agriculture Systems (ASA/CSSA/SSSA Madison, WI), pp. 303-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J. 1977. Spectral estimation of grass canopy variables. Remote Sensing of Environment 6, 11-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8, 127-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J. 1980. Remote sensing of leaf water content in the near infrared. Remote Sensing of Environment 10, 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varvel, G. E., Schlemmer, M. R. and Schepers, J. S. 1999. Relationship between spectral data from an aerial image and soil organic matter and phosphorus levels. Precision Agriculture 1, 291-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walburg, G., Bauer, M. E., Daughtry, C. S. T. and Housley, T. L. 1982. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on the growth, yield, and reflectance characteristics of corn canopies. Agronomy Journal 74, 677-683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, C. L., Mass, S. J., Aase, J. K., Hatfield, J. L., Pinter, P. J., Jr., Jackson, R. D., Kanemasu, E. T. and Lapitan, R. L. 1992. Multisite analysis of spectral-biophysical data for wheat. Remote Sensing of Environment 42, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, C. L. and Richardson, A. J. 1990. Use of spectral vegetation indices to infer leaf area, evapotranspiration, and yield: I. Rationale. Agronomy Journal 86, 623-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, C. L., Richardson, A. J., Escobar, D. E. and Gerbermann, A. H. 1991. Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sensing of Environment 35, 105-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willers, J. L., Seal, M. R. and Luttrell, R. G. 1999. Remote sensing, line-intercept sampling for tarnished plant bugs (Heteroptera: Miridae) in mid-south cotton. Journal of the Cotton Science 3, 160-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. and Anderson, G. L. 1999. Airborne videography to identify spatial plant growth variability for grain sorghum. Precision Agriculture 1, 67-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Hendley, P., Drost, D., O'Neill, M. and Ustin, S. 1999. Corn and soybean yield indicators using remotely sensed vegetation index. In: International Conference on Precision Agriculture Fourth (St. Paul, MN, July 19–22) 1998 (ASA/CSSA/SSSA Madison, WI, 1999), pp. 1475-1481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chris T. Leon

    Present address: Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, Louisiana State University, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, 117 Dorman Hall, Box 9555, Mississippi State, MS, 39762

    Chris T. Leon, David R. Shaw, Michael S. Cox, Melinda J. Abshire, Brian Ward & MiLton C. Wardlaw III

  2. Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management, Louisiana State University, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803

    Clarence Watson

Authors
  1. Chris T. Leon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Shaw
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael S. Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Melinda J. Abshire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brian Ward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. MiLton C. Wardlaw III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Clarence Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leon, C.T., Shaw, D.R., Cox, M.S. et al. Utility of Remote Sensing in Predicting Crop and Soil Characteristics. Precision Agriculture 4, 359–384 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026387830942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026387830942

Search

Navigation