Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Two Kinds of Prediction-Correction Methods for Monotone Variational Inequalities

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the relationship between the forward-backward splitting method and the extra-gradient method for monotone variational inequalities. Both of the methods can be viewed as prediction-correction methods. The only difference is that they use different search directions in the correction-step. Our analysis explains theoretically why the extra-gradient methods usually outperform the forward-backward splitting methods. We suggest some modifications for the two methods and numerical results are given to verify the superiority of the modified methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis, Parallel and Distributed Computation, Numerical Methods, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.W. Cottle, J.S. Pang, and R.E. Stone, The Linear Complementarity Problem: Academic Press: New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Douglas and H.H. Rachford, “On the numerical solution of the heat conduction problem in 2 and 3 space variables,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 82, pp. 421–439, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.C. Eaves, “On the basic theorem of complementarity,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 1, pp. 68–75, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Glowinski, Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Variational Problems. Springer-Verlag: New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A.A. Goldstein, “Convex programming in Hilbert space,” Bulletin of American Mathematical Society, vol. 70, pp. 709–710, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.T. Harker and J.S. Pang, “Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: A survey of theory algorithms and applications,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 48, pp. 161–220, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.T. Harker and J.S. Pang, “A Damped-Newton method for the linear complementarity problem,” Lectures in Applied Mathematics, vol. 26, pp. 265–284, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.S. He, “Aprojection and contraction method for a class of linear complementarity problem and its application in convex quadratic programming,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization, vol. 25, pp. 247–262, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B.S. He, “A new method for a class of linear variational inequalities,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 66, pp. 137–144, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B.S. He, “Solving a class of linear projection equations,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 68, pp. 71–80, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.S. He, “A class of projection and contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities,” Applied Mathematics & Optimization, vol. 35, pp. 69–76, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B.S. He, “Inexact implicit methods for monotone general variational inequalities,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 86, pp. 199–216, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.S. He and L.Z. Liao, “Improvements of some projection methods for monotone nonlinear variational inequalities,” J. of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 112, pp. 111–128, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.N. Khobotov, “Modification of the extragradient method for solving variational inequalities and certain optimization problems,” U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. Phys., vol. 27, pp. 120–127, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.M. Korpelevich, “The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems,” Ekonomika i Matematchskie Metody, vol. 12, pp. 747–756, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E.S. Levitin and B.T. Polyak, “Constrained minimization problems,” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 6, pp. 1–50, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.L. Lions and B. Mercier, “Splitting algorithms for the sum of two nonlinear operators,” SIAM J. Numerical Analysis, vol. 16, pp. 964–979, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Marcotte, “Application of Khobotov's algorithm to variational inequalities and network equilibrium problems,” Inf. Syst. Oper. Res., vol. 29, pp. 258–270, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Marcotee and J.P. Dussault, “A note on a globally convergent newton method for solving variational inequalities,” Operation Research Letters, vol. 6, pp. 35–42, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.T. Rockafellar, “Augmented lagrangians and applications of the proximal point algorithm in convex programming,” Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 1, pp. 97–116, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.V. Solodov and P. Tseng, “Modified projection-type methods for monotone variational inequalities,” SIAM J. Control Optim, vol. 34, pp. 1814–1830, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Sun, “A projection and contraction method for the no-linear complementary problem and its extensions,” Mathematica Numerica Sinica, vol. 16, pp. 183–194, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Sun, “A new stepsize skill for solving a class of nonlinear projection equations,” Journal of Computational Mathematics, vol. 13, pp. 357–368, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Sun, “A class of iterative methods for solving nonlinear projection equations,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, vol. 91, pp. 123–140, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Taji, M. Fukushima, and T. Ibaraki, “A globally convergent newton method for solving strongly monotone variational inequalities,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 58, pp. 369–383, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Tseng, “A modified forward-backword splitting method for maximal monotone mappings,” SIAM. J. Control. Optim., vol. 38, pp. 431–446, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.L. Xue and Y.Y. Ye, “An efficient algorithm for minimizing a sum of Euclidean norms with applications,” SIAM J. Optim., vol. 7, pp. 1017–1036, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, B., Yuan, X. & Zhang, J.J. Comparison of Two Kinds of Prediction-Correction Methods for Monotone Variational Inequalities. Computational Optimization and Applications 27, 247–267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COAP.0000013058.17185.90

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COAP.0000013058.17185.90

Navigation