Skip to main content
Log in

Pigouvian Taxation in Tourism

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper studies the characteristics and the effects of a tax imposed by a local government on the land used to create new tourists' accommodations. First, a dynamic policy game between a monopolist in a tourist area and a local government is considered. In each period the former has to decide the size of land undergoing development, whereas the latter has to choose the tax to levy on each newly developed area unit. Linear Perfect Markov strategies are derived for both the non-cooperative and the public monopoly case. In equilibrium, a public monopoly would develop land more rapidly than a private monopoly. Furthermore, the more the monopolist discounts the future, the more the long run use of the natural resource is reduced. Second, the properties of the tax are studied considering an oligopolistic market structure. The tax alone does not lead to the socially optimal level of land use. However, its combined effect with another policy instrument such as a quota, induces the optimal level of resource use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Başar, T. and G. Olsder (1995), Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory (2nd edn.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B. and A. Markandya (1990), ‘The Conditions for Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Development’, European Economic Review 34, 659-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A. H. (1980), ‘The Pigouvian Tax Rule under Monopoly’, American Economic Review 70, 1037-1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1991), ‘A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influences on Price,’ Journal of Political Economy 99, 1109-1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, F. and V. Leeworthy (1990), ‘Recreational Demand by Tourists for Saltwater Beach Days’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18, 189-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benchekroun, H. and N. van Long (1998), ‘Efficiency Inducing Taxation for Polluting Oligopolist’, Journal of Public Economics 70, 325-342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, A. C. (1992), Elements of Dynamic Optimization. McGraw-Hill, Int. Editions.

  • Coase, R. (1972), ‘Durable Goods Monopolists’, Journal of Law and Economics 15, 143-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H. and J. F. Thisse (1999), ‘On the Taxation of Polluting Products in a Differentiated Industry’, European Economic Review 43, 575-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E., S. Jørgensen, N. van Long and G. Sorger (2000), Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U. and O. von dem Hagen (1998), ‘Pigouvian Taxes under Imperfect Competition if Consumption Depends on Emissions’, Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 507-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Font, A. R. (2000), ‘Mass Tourism and the Demand for Protected Natural Area: A Travel Cost Approach’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 97-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, C. and H. Green (1995), Tourism and Environment. A Sustainable Relationship? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäler, K. and A. de Zeeuw (1998), ‘The Acid Rain Differential Game’, Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 167-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, G. (1993), Sustainable Tourism Development: Guide for Local Planners. World Tourism Organization Madrid.

  • Pearce, D., A. Markandya and E. Barbier (1989), Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piga, C. A. (1999), ‘Pigouvian Taxation and Sustainable Development in Tourism’, Discussion Paper 01, De Haan Tourism and Travel Research Institute.

  • Rowthorn, B. and G. Brown (1999), ‘When a High Discount Rate Encourages Biodiversity’, International Economic Review 40, 315-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M. T. and M. Stabler (1997), The economics of Tourism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen, O. (1996), ‘Trade with Polluting Nonrenewable Resources’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulph, A. and D. Ulph (1994), ‘The Optimal Time Path of a Carbon Tax’, Oxford Economic Papers 46, 857-868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirl, F. (1994), ‘Pigouvian Taxation of Energy for Flow and Stock Externality and Strategic, Noncompetitive Energy Pricing’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26, 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piga, C.A. Pigouvian Taxation in Tourism. Environmental and Resource Economics 26, 343–359 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000003544.77701.01

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000003544.77701.01

Navigation