Skip to main content
Log in

Tissue response to the implantation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) sutures were implanted to test animals intramuscularly, and tissue reaction was investigated and compared with the reaction to silk and catgut. Tested monofilament sutures made of PHAs of two types – polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and a copolymer of hydroxybutyrate and hydroxyvalerate (PHV) – featured the strength necessary for the healing of muscle-fascial wounds. The reaction of tissues to polymeric implants was similar to their reaction to silk and was less pronounced than the reaction to catgut; it was expressed in a transient post-traumatic inflammation (up to four weeks) and the formation of a fibrous capsule less than 200 μm thick, which became as thin as 40–60 μm after 16 weeks, in the course of reverse development. Macrophages and foreign-body giant cells with a high activity of acid phosphatase were actively involved in this process. PHB and PHB/PHV sutures implanted intramuscularly for an extended period (up to one year) did not cause any acute vascular reaction at the site of implantation or any adverse events, such as suppurative inflammation, necrosis, calcification of the fibrous capsule or malignant tumor formation. No statistically significant differences were revealed in the tissue response to polymer sutures of the two types. Capsules around silk and catgut sutures did not become significantly thinner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. J. Anderson and E. A. Dawes, Microbiol. Rev. 54 (1990) 450.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Amass, A. Amass and B. Tighe, Polymers Int. 47 (1998) 89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Sudesh, H. Abe and Y. Doi, Prog. Polym. Sci. 33 (2000) 1471.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. L. Madison and G. W. Huisman, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63 (1999) 21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. F. Williams, D. P. Martin, D. M. Horowitz and O. P. Peoples, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 25 (1999) 11.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Asrar and K. J. Graus, in “Series of Biopolymers”, Vol. 10, edited by A. Steinbüchel (Wiley-VCY Verlag GmbH, 2002) 4 p. 55.

  7. S. F. Williams and D. P. Martin, in “Series of Biopolymers”, Vol. 10, edited by A. Steinbüchel (Wiley-VCY Verlag GmbH, 2002) 4 p. 91.

  8. A. Steinbüchel and H. E. Valentin, FEMS Microbiol Lett. 128 (1995) 219.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Borkenhagen, R. C. Stoll, U. W. Suter and P. Aebischer, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 2155.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Gogolewski, M. Javanovic, S. M. Perren, J. G. Dillon and K. M. Hughes, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27 (1993) 1135.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Chaput, M. Assand, L. H. Yahia, C. H. Rivard and A. Selmani, Biomater. Liv. Syst. Interact. 3 (1995) 29 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. A. Mckenzie and H. S. Wallace, Aust. J. Chem. 7 (1954) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Seifter, Arch. Biochem. 25 (1950) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Brandl, E. J. Knee and R. C. Fuller, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 11 (1989) 49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. International Standard For Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices ISO 10993, Part 6 “Tests for local effects after implantation”, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.

  16. S. A. Gordeev, Y. P. Nekrasov and S. J. Shilton, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 81 (2001) 2260.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. A. Pkhakadze, V. P. Yatsenko, A. K. Kolomiitsev, M. V. Grigorieva and K. L. Konoplitskaya, Biodestruktivnyye polimery (Biodegradable polymers), Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1990) (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Gomori, Am. J. Clin. Path. 16 (1946) 347.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. C. Campbell, “Statistics for biologists” (University Press, Cambridge, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. V. Serov and V. S. Paukov in “Vospaleniye” (“Inflammation”) (Meditsina, Moscow, 1995) 640 pp. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. N. Salthouse, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 10 (1976) 197.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. F. Burpee, R. W. Hackenberg and D. V. Hillegas, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 12 (1978) 767.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V. F. Burpee, R. W. Hackenberg and D. V. Hillegas, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 12 (1978) 767.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Malm, S. Bowald, A. Bylock and C. Buch, J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 104 (1992) 600.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Saad, G. Ciardelli, S. Matter, M. Welti, G. K. Uhlschmid, P. Neuenschwander and V. W. Suter, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 39 (1998) 594.

    Google Scholar 

  26. X. Yang, K. Zhao and G.-Q. Chen, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 1391.

    Google Scholar 

  27. US patent 3,072,538 (January 1963).

  28. Y. F. Dufrene, C. J. Boonaert and P. G. Rouxhet, J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. 12 (1998) 1279.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Rouxhet, F. Duhoux, O. Borecky, R. Legras and Y. J. Schneider, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 75 (2002) 119.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Y. Lee, L. Choi, K. Han and J. Y. Song, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65 (1999) 2762.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. R. H. Raitz, R. J. Ulevitch, S. D. Wright, C. H. Sibley, A. Ding and C. F. Nathan, Faseb. J. 5 (1991) 2652.

    Google Scholar 

  32. V. I. Sevastianov, T. G. Volova, N. V. Perova and G. S. Kalacheva, J. Biomater. Sci. 14 (2003) 1029.

    Google Scholar 

  33. V. I. Sevastianov, I. A. Dovzhik, I. A. Titushkin, E. A. Nemets, M. Belomestnaya and E. I. Shishatskaya, Perspektivnyye materially (Promising materials) 5 (2001) 47 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. I. Shishatskaya, V. I. Sevastianov, T. G. Volova and N. V. Perova, in book Abstr. Inr. Symp. Biol. Polym. (Germany, Munster) September (2002) 150.

  35. T. G. Volova, E. I. Shishatskaya, V. I. Sevastiyanov, S. N. Efremov and O. M. Mogilnaya, Biochem. Bioeng. J. 16 (2003) 125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shishatskaya, E.I., Volova, T.G., Puzyr, A.P. et al. Tissue response to the implantation of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 719–728 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000030215.49991.0d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000030215.49991.0d

Keywords

Navigation