Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss the characteristics of academic “spin-off policies” in environments outside of high tech clusters and where technology transfer and entrepreneurship infrastructures have been weak. We explore whether the policies could explain the lack of growth potential of spin-off ventures that have repeatedly observed. We studied the case of Belgium, gathering data from nine of spin-off policies in the eight largest academic institutions and in 47 firms. We propose that spin-off policies in academic institutions significantly affect the growth potential of ventures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BankBoston, 1997, MIT: The Impact of Innovation, BankBoston Economics Department.

  • Bannock Associates, 1999, EU Innovation Finance Benchmarks, London.

  • Bird Schoonhoven, C., K.M. Eisenhardt, and K. Lyman, 1990, ‘Speeding Product to Market: Waiting Time to First Product Introductions in New Firms,’ Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 177-207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S. and F. Malerba, 2001, ‘The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes,’ Industrial and Corporate Changes 20(4).

  • Bresnahan, T., A. Gambardella, and A. Saxenian, 2001, ‘“Old Economy” Inputs for “New Economy” Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys,’ Industrial and Corporate Changes 20(4), 835-859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W., 1989, ‘Strategic Change: The Effects of Founding and History,’ Academy of Management Journal 32, 489-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, B., 2001, ‘Generating Spin-Offs: Evidence From the OECD,’ Science Technology Industry Review. Special Issue on Fostering High Tech Spin-Offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation 26, 13-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, H. and M. Cincerra, 2000a, ‘R&D Expenditures and the National Innovation System,’ in H. Capron and W. Meeusen (eds.), The National Innovation System of Belgium, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp. 73-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, H. and M. Cincerra, 2000b, ‘Technological Performance,’ in H. Capron and W. Meeusen (eds.), The National Innovation System of Belgium, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp. 175-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, H. and W. Meeusen, (eds.) 2000, The National Innovation System of Belgium, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V. and A. Piccaluga, 2000, ‘Exploitation and Diffusion of Public Research: The General Framework and the Case of Academic Spin-Off Companies,’ R&D Management 30.

  • Cincera, M., B. Clarysse, R. Kalenga-Mpala, E. Monard, C. Nauwelaers, A. Spithoven, and P. Teirlink, 2001a, Rapport belge en matière de science, technologie et innovation (Tome I), Brussels: Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et culturelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincera, M., B. Clarysse, R. Kalenga-Mpala, E. Monard, C. Nauwelaers, A. Spithoven, and P. Teirlink, 2001b, Rapport belge en matière de science, technologie et innovation. Le système belge d'innovation: leçons et défis (Tome II), Brussels: Services Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et culturelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., J.J. Degroof, and A. Heirman, 2001, Analysis of the Typical Growth Path of Technology-Based Companies in Life Sciences and Information Technology, and the Role of Different Sources of Innovation Financing, Brussels: European Commission, Entreprise Directorate-General.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debackere, K., 2000, ‘Managing Academic R&D as a Business at KU Leuven: Context, Structure and Process,’ R&D Management 30(4), 323-328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degroof, J.J., 2002, Spinning Off New Ventures from Research Institutions Outside High Tech Entrepreneurial Areas. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institutitute of Technology. Available at Web.mit.edu/jdegroof/www/index.htm.

  • European Commission, 1998, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Risk Capital: A Key to Job Creation in the European Union, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2000, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Progress Report on the Risk Capital Action Plan, (COM (2000) 658 final), Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., 1986, Entrepreneurs as organizational products: semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. In G. Libecap (ed.), Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. A Research Annual. Entrepreneurship and Innovation: the Impact of Venture Capital on the Development of New Enterprise, Vol. 1, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. and C. McKinlay, 1999, The Commercialisation of University Research in Europe, Manchester: University of Manchester, PREST (Policy research in Engineering, Science and Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (ed.), 2000, Understanding Silicon Valley. The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.M., W.F. Miller, M.G. Hancock, and H.S. Rowen (eds.), 2000, The Silicon Valley Hedge. A Habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustar, P., 1995, The Creation of Enterprises by Researchers: Conditions for Growth and the Role of Public Authorities. Paper presented at the High Level Workshop on SMEs: Employment, Innovation and Growth, Washington, DC.

  • Mustar, P., 2001, ‘Generating Spin-Offs From Public Research: Trends and Outlook,’ Science Technology Industry Review. Special Issue on Fostering High Tech Spin-Offs: a Public Strategy for Innovation 26, 165-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauwelaers, C., 2001, Belgian Report on Science, Technology, and Innovation. Portrait of the Decentralized STI Policy System of Belgium. Maastricht: Maastricht economic research institute on innovation and technology (MERIT) — Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., 1992, ‘Informational and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures: The Case of the 128 Venture Group,’ in N. Nohria and R. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Forms, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 240-261.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1999, Fostering entrepreneurship, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., M. Riccaboni, F. Pammolli, and W.W. Powell, 2002, ‘A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences,’ Management Science 48(1), 24-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., S.M. Camp, W.D. Bygrave, E. Autio, and M. Hay, 2001, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Wellesley, London: Babson College, London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E., 1991, Entrepreneurs in High Technology. Lessons from MIT and Beyond, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. and Malone, D., 1996, ‘Policies and Structures for Spinning Off New Companies from Research and Development Organizations,’ R&D Management 26(1).

  • Rowen, H.S., 2000, ‘Serendipity or Strategy: How Technology and Markets Came to Favor Silicon Valley,’ in C.M. Lee, W.F. Miller, M.G. Hancock, and H. S. Rowen (eds.), The Silicon Valley Hedge. A habitat for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 184-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional Advantage. Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal Quince Wicksteed, 1990, The Cambridge Phenomenon. The Growth of High Technology Industry in a University Town, (2nd edition). Cambridge: UK, Market Street, Cambridge CB4 5 QG: Segal Quince Wicksteed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal Quince Wicksteed, 1999, The Cambridge Phenomenon Revisited. Cambridge: UK, Market Street, Cambridge CB4 5 QG: Segal Quince Wicksteed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D.J. and B.S. Tether, 1998, ‘New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union: An Introduction,’ Research Policy 26, 933-946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M., 2000, ‘Dealmakers and Counselors: Law Firms as Intermediaries in the Development of Silicon Valley, in M. Kenney (ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley. The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, pp. 218-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmons, J., L. Smollen, and A. Dingee, 1990, New Venture Creation. Entrepreneurship in the 1990s, Boston: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. MIT Industrial Performance Center, 292 Main Street Room E38-104, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4307

    Jean-Jacques Degroof

  2. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, 02139

    Edward B. Roberts

Authors
  1. Jean-Jacques Degroof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Edward B. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Degroof, JJ., Roberts, E.B. Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures. The Journal of Technology Transfer 29, 327–352 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034126.23592.23

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034126.23592.23

Keywords

Search

Navigation