Skip to main content
Log in

A GIS Analysis to Evaluate Areas Suitable for Crushed Stone Aggregate Quarries in New England, USA

  • Published:
Natural Resources Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aggregate is a low unit-value mineral commodity. Costs to move aggregate from the mine site to the point of use is a large fraction of the resource cost to users. Production sites for aggregate occur where suitable source materials exist and where transportation and market conditions are favorable. The increasing demand for aggregate and the difficulty of developing and permitting new sites and of renewal of permits on existing sites of aggregate production indicates that aggregate will be supplied from sources yet to be developed or delineated in many areas. Site development and permitting for aggregate production is difficult because many land management plans and zoning actions fail to anticipate prospective source areas for aggregate in a way that is consistent with both the source rock quality and the transportation and socioeconomic factors that define the economic viability of the industry. Spatial analysis provides a method to integrate both geology and economic (transportation and marketplace) parameters in a regional model. Weights of evidence (WofE) analysis has been used to measure the spatial correlation of geologic map, transportation network, and population data with current production sites for crushed stone aggregate in the New England region of the northeastern United States. Weighted logistic regression (WLR) is used with the WofE results to rank areas in terms of their relative suitability for production of crushed stone. Spatial analysis indicates that 85% of the 106 crushed stone aggregate quarries in New England are sited within 1.6 km (1 mile) of either a principal highway or rail line in the region. Seventy-eight percent of crushed stone aggregate quarries are sited in census tracts with population densities exceeding 100 people/mile2. These relations illustrate the importance of proximity to both transportation corridors and developing areas where aggregate is predominately used. Only one active crushed stone quarry is located in a census tract with a population density less than 15 people/mile2, reflecting the lack of sufficient market demand in many rural areas to develop an operation there. However, since 1990, almost all new quarries have been developed in census tracts with population densities less than 200 people/mile2, indicating the difficulty of permitting new quarry sites in highly populated areas. Crushed stone aggregate is produced predominately from three hard rock types that are distributed widely in New England; 28% of sites use granitic rock, 25% use carbonate rocks, and 25% use mafic rock types that are categorized as trap rock by the aggregate industry. The other crushed stone aggregate sources include a variety of fine-grained metamorphic rock types. Carbonate rocks and Jurassic basalt (the primary trap rock source) are the most prevalent source rocks on an area-weighted basis. Spatial analysis can be used on a regional scale to rank areas by their relative suitabilityfor crushed stone aggregate production based on geology, transportation, and population parameters. The results of this regional analysis can identify areas for more detailed evaluation. As transportation or population features change, the model can be revised easily to reflect these changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Agterberg, F. P., 1989, LOGDIA-FORTRAN 77 program for logistic regression with diagnostics: Computers & Geosciences, v. 15, no. 4, p. 599–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Cheng, Q., and Wright, D. F., 1993, Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping, in Davis, J. C., and Herzfeld, U. C., eds., Computers in Geology, 25 Years of Progress: Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England, p. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., Bonham-Carter, G. F., and Wright, D. F., 1990, Statistical pattern integration for mineral exploration, in Gáal, G., and Merriam, D. F., eds., Computer Applications in Resource Estimation Prediction and Assessment of Metals and Petroleum: Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agterberg, F. P., and Cheng, Q., 2002, Conditional independence test for weights-of-evidence modeling: Natural Resources Research, v. 11, no. 4, p. 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM,2003a. Annual book of ASTMstandards, Section 4, Volume 04.02, Concrete and mineral aggregates: Am. Soc. Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 832 p.

  • ASTM, 2003b, Annual book of ASTM standards, Section 4, Volume 04.03, Road and paving materials; Vehicle-pavement systems: Am. Soc. Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1270 p.

  • Barksdale, R. D., 2000. The aggregate handbook: National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association, Arlington, Virginia, 1 CD-ROM.

  • Bates, R. L., 1969, Geology of the industrial rocks and minerals: Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 459 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1994, Geographic Information Systems for geoscientists-modeling in GIS: Elsevier Science, New York, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonham-Carter, G. F., Agterberg, F. P., and Wright, D. F., 1988, Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia: Photogramm. Eng., v. 54, no. 11, p. 1585–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, C. G., Cady, W. M., Thompson, J. B., Jr., and Billings, M. P., eds. and compilers, 1961, Centennial geology map of Vermont: U.S. Geol. Survey, 1:250,000, 1 sheet. (transverse mercator projection, based on best available information).

  • Fakundiny, R. H., 1980, Marketing analysis of the sand and gravel business using central-place theory and surficial geology maps, in Dunn, J. R., Fakundiny, R. H., and Rickard, L. V., eds., Proc. Fourteenth Annual Forum on the Geology on Industrial Minerals: New York State Museum Bull. 436, p. 40–52.

  • Hermes, O. D., Gromet, L. P., and Murray, D. P., 1994, Bedrock geologic map of Rhode Island: Office Rhode Island State Geologist, Rhode Island Map Series No. 1, 1 map sheet, scale: 1:100,000.

  • Joseph, S. E., Miller, R. V., Tan, S. S., and Goodman, R. W., 1987, Mineral land classification of the greater Los Angeles area, Part V, Classification of sand and gravel resource areas, Saugus-Newhall Production-Consumption Region, and Palm-dale Production-Consumption Region: California Div. Mines and Geology Spec. Rept. 143, 46 p.

  • Kemp, L. D., Bonham-Carter, G. F., Raines, G. L., and Looney, C. G., 2001, Arc-SDM: Arcview extension for spatial data modeling using weights of evidence, logistic regression, fuzzy logic and neural network analysis: http://ntserv.gis.nrcan.gc.ca/sdm/.

  • Kuff, K. R., 1984, Rates of preemption of sand and gravel deposits in an urban area, in Glaser, J. D., and Edwards, J., eds., Twentieth Forum on the Geology of Industrial Minerals: Maryland Geol. Survey Spec. Publ. 2, p. 73–79.

  • Langer, W. H., 1988, Natural aggregates of the conterminous United States: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1594, 33 p.

  • Langer, W. H., 2002, Managing and protecting aggregate resources: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 02-415, 15 p.

  • Langer, W. H., and Glanzman, V. M., 1993, Natural aggregate-building America's future: U.S. Geol. Survey Circ. 1110, 39 p.

  • Langer, W. H., and Knepper, D. H., Jr., 1995, Geologic characterization of natural aggregate: U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept. 95-582, 32 p.

  • Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., and Rhind, D. W., 2001, Geographic information systems and science: JohnWiley & Sons, New York, p. 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. B., Bothner, W. A., Moench, R. H., and Thompson, J. B., Jr., 1997, Bedrock geologic map of New Hampshire: U.S. Geol. Survey Spec. Map, 2 map sheets, scale: 1:250,000.

  • Marlow, J. E., Stanley, M. C., and Hudman, G. M., 2001, Modeling urban resources: a transportation GIS approach: Aggregates Manager, v. 6, no. 3, p. 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFaul, E. J., Mason, G. T., Jr., Ferguson, W. B., and Lipin, B. R., 2000, U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Databases-MRDSand MAS/MILS: U.S. Geol. Survey Digital Data Series DDS-52, 2 discs.

  • Mihalasky, M. J., 1999, Mineral potential modeling of gold and silver mineralization in the Nevada Great Basina GIS-based analysis using weights of evidence: unpubl. doctoral dessertation, Univ. Ottawa, 360 p., 144 figs.

  • Osberg, P. H., Hussey, A. M. II, and Boone, G. M., 1985, Bedrock geologic mapof Maine: Maine Geol. Survey, 1 map sheet, scale: 1:500,000.

  • Poulin, R., and Bildeau, M. L., 1993, Amodel of a mineral aggregate market-the eastern coastal USA: Resource Policy, June 1993, p. 131–149.

  • Poulin, R., Pakalnis, R. C., and Sinding, K. 1994, Aggregate resources; production and environmental constraints: Environmental Geology, v. 23, no. 3, p. 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, G. L., 1999, Evaluation of weights of evidence to predict epithermal gold deposits in the Great Basin of the western United States: Natural Resourses Research, v. 8, no. 4, p. 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, G. L., Bonham-Carter, G. F., and Kemp, L. D., 2000, Predictive probabilistic modeling using Arcview GIS: ArcUser, v.3,no.2,p.45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raines, G. L., and Mihalasky, M. J., 2002, Areconnaissance method for delineation of tracts for regional-scale mineral-resource assessment based on geologic-map data: Natural Resources Research, v. 11, no. 4, p. 241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, J., compiler, 1985, Bedrock geological map of Connecticut: Connecticut Geologic and Natural History Survey, Natural Resource Atlas Map Series, 2 map sheets, scale: 1:125,000.

  • Stanley, M. C., Marlow, J. E., and Harris, D. P., 2000, Land-use issues and the aggregates industry-an introduction to the issues we face: Aggregates Manager, v. 5, no. 9, p. 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepordei, V. V., 2001a, U.S. aggregates industry-an overview: Aggregates Magager, v. 5, no. 11, p. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepordei, V. V., 2001b, Aggregates industry atlas of the United States: National Stone, Sand and Gravel Association, Washington, D.C., one CD-disk.

  • Weaver, B., 1995, Overview of the aggregate industry: SME 1995 Annual Meeting, Soc. Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., Preprint No. 95-222, 3 p.

  • Wright, D. F., 1996, Evaluating volcanic hosted massive sulphide favourability using GIS-based spatial data integration models, Snow Lake Area, Manitoba: unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Univ. Ottawa, 344 p.

  • Wright, D. F., and Bonham-Carter, G. F., 1996. VHMS favorability mapping with GIS-based integration models, Chisel Lake-Anderson Lake area, in Bonham-Carter, G. F., Galley, A. G., and Hall, G. E. M., eds., EXTECH I: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Massive Sulphide Research in the Rusty Lake-Snow Lake Greenstone Belts, Manitoba: Geol. Survey Canada Bull., 426, p. 339–376, 387-401.

  • U.S. Census Bureau, 2000, 2000 Census Tracts. Arcview shape-file. 1:500,000. U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/tr2000.html

  • U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002, National Transportation Atlas Database, National Highway Planning Network data, 1:100,000, National Rail Network, 1:2,000,000. Vector digital data. Available at: http://www.bts.gov/gis

  • Zen, Ean, Goldsmith, G. R., Ratcliffe, N. L., Robinson, P., and Stanley, R. S., 1983, Bedrock geologic map of Massachusetts: U.S. Geol. Survey, Monograph Ser., 3 map sheets, scale: 1:250,000.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, G.R., Kapo, K.E. & Raines, G.L. A GIS Analysis to Evaluate Areas Suitable for Crushed Stone Aggregate Quarries in New England, USA. Natural Resources Research 13, 143–159 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NARR.0000046917.21649.8d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NARR.0000046917.21649.8d

Navigation