Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reexamining the Role of Cognitive Conflict in Science Concept Learning

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we defined and quantified the degree of cognitive conflict induced by a discrepant event from a cognitive perspective. Based on the scheme developed, we investigated the relationship between cognitive conflict and conceptual change, and the influences of students' cognitive characteristics on conflict in learning the concept of density. Subjects were 171 seventh-grade girls from two city middle schools in Korea. Tests regarding logical thinking ability, field dependence/independence, and meaningful learning approach were administered. A preconception test and a test of responses to a discrepant event were also administered. Computer-assisted instruction was then provided to students as a conceptual change intervention. A conception test was administered as a posttest. In analysing students' responses to the discrepant event, seven types of responses were identified: Rejection, reinterpretation, exclusion, uncertainty, peripheral belief change, belief decrease, and belief change. These types were then ordered into four levels. The results indicated that there existed a significant correlation between cognitive conflict and conceptual change. t-test results revealed that there were statistically significant differences in the degree of cognitive conflict by the levels of students' logical thinking ability and field dependence/independence. Meaningful learning approach, however, was found to have no statistically significant effect on cognitive conflict. Educational implications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1988). Strategies for meta-learning in physics. Physics Education, 23(2), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Children's reasoning and thinking. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 939–981). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G. N. (1983). Conflict, learning, and Piaget: Comments on Zimmerman and Blom's "Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning." Developmental Review, 3, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M. L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students' understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 625–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M. L., & Schafer, L. E. (1994). Relationships between students' meaningful learning orientation and their understanding of genetics topics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(4), 393–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. K. (1991). Educational implications of field dependence-independence. In S. Wapner & J. Demick (Eds.), Field dependence-independence: Cognitive style across the life span (pp. 149–175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donn, S. (1989, March). Epistemological issues in science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.

  • Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the "cognitive conflict" strategy for conceptual change – some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1994). Making a sense of secondary science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (1997). A note on the reliability and validity of a 30-item version of Entwistle & Tait's Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. NewYork: Nichols Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Tait, H. (1994). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Center for Research on Learning and Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, R. W. (1992). Interestingness. British Journal of Psychology, 83(1), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science and Education, 6(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. R. D. (1998, July). Identifying learning styles. Paper presented at the annual Summer Workshop for Beginning Vocational Education Teachers, Montgomery, West Virginia.

  • Gorsky, P., & Finegold, M. (1994). The role of anomaly and of cognitive dissonance in restructuring students' concepts of force. Instructional Science, 22, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 116–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G. (1986). The acquisition of scientific knowledge: Analysis and representation of student conceptions concerning density. Science Education, 70(2), 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G. (1988). The ecological context of knowledge: Implications for learning science in developing countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(4), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542–558). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E., Champagne, A. B., & Chaiklin, S. D. (1992). The ubiquitous quantities: Explorations that inform the design of instruction on the physical properties of matter. Science Education, 76(6), 597–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(9), 733–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills (Monograph of the NARST, No 1). Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research on Science Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limón, M., & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: A case study in the domain of natural sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C. (1986). Science. In R. Dillon & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction (pp. 155–204). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & Kyllonen, P. (1981). The field dependence-independence construct: Some, one or none. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2001). Responses to anomalous data on controversial topics and theory change. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 453–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. B. (1983). Equilibration as cognitive conflict. Developmental Review, 3, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noh, T., Kang, S., Kim, H., Chae, W., & Noh, S. (1997). Development and application of a conceptual change model for effective laboratory teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17, 179–189 (Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3–13). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieck, W. (1994). Density: A discovery approach. Science Activities, 31(2), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roadrangka, V., Yeany, R. H., & Padilla, M. J. (1983, April). The construction and validation of Group Assessment of Logical Thinking (GALT). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.

  • Roald, I., & Mikalsen, O. (2000). What are the Earth and the heavenly bodies like? A study of objectual conceptions among Norwegian deaf and hearing pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, J. A., & Dawson, C. J. (1977). Teaching about floating and sinking: An attempt to link cognitive psychology with classroom practice. Science Education, 61(2), 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. H., Asoko, H. M., & Driver, R. H. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 310–329). Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften an der Universität Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1999). The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. L., & Renner, J. W. (1982). Student understandings and misunderstandings of states of matter and density changes. School Science and Mathematics, 82(8), 650–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (1961). The acquisition of conservation of substance and weight in children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2, 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Carey, S., & Wiser, M. (1985). On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density. Cognition, 21(3), 177–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavy, R., & Berkovitz, B. (1980). Cognitive conflict as a basis for teaching quantitative aspects of the concept of temperature. Science Education, 64, 679–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, F. M. (2000). What happens to the food we eat? Children's conceptions of the structure and function of the digestive system. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 507–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Stavy, R., & Cohen, S. (1998). Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1257–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C.-C. (2000). Enhancing science instruction: The use of 'conflict maps.' International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 285–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students' conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenplas-Holper, C. (1996). Intraindividual and interindividual cognitive conflict, related variables and relations with cognitive development. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 55(2/3), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voska, K. W., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 160–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3–13). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cos, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Reviews of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarlas, A. S., & Gelman, R. (1998, April). Learning as a predictor of situational interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1977). Modeling. In H. Hom & P. Robinson (Eds.), Psychological processes in early education (pp. 37–70). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Blom, D. E. (1983). Toward an empirical test of the role of cognitive conflict in learning. Developmental Review, 3, 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jeonju National University of Education, Korea

    Sukjin Kang

  2. Kansas State University, USA

    Lawrence C. Scharmann

  3. Seoul National University, Korea

    Taehee Noh

Authors
  1. Sukjin Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lawrence C. Scharmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taehee Noh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C. & Noh, T. Reexamining the Role of Cognitive Conflict in Science Concept Learning. Research in Science Education 34, 71–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3

Search

Navigation