Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graphing in Physics: Processes and Sources of Error in Tertiary Entrance Examinations in Western Australia

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpretation and construction of graphs are central to the study of physics and to performance in physics. In this paper, I explore the interpretation and construction processes called upon in questions with a graphical component, in Western Australian Physics Tertiary Entrance Examinations. In addition, I list errors made by students as reported by examiners and offer explanations for the errors. Outcomes of the inquiry are the identification of sources of challenge in the graphing questions, including requirements to calculate gradient and analyse experimental data. I also identify question structures that could be barriers to students' understanding the examination questions. The micro-analysis of graphing in one jurisdiction can inform assessment of high-school physics in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg, C. A., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing students' abilities to construct and interpret line graphs: Disparities between multiple-choice and free-response instruments. Science Education, 78, 527–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council. (1994a-2001a). Physics, Tertiary Entrance Examination. Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council. (1994b-2001b). Physics, Tertiary Entrance Examination Report. Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council. (2000c). 2000 /2001 Syllabus Manual Year 11 and Year 12 subjects.Perth, Australia: Curriculum Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, P. A. (2002). An investigation of disjuncture between graphing in school mathematics and school physics. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 268-275). Auckland, New Zealand: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster P. A., & Mueller, U. (2000). Diversity and difficulties with graphics calculator usage in the 1999 calculus tertiary entrance examination in Western Australia. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 14(1), 4–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. A., Rich, B. S., & Day, R. (1996). The assessment of a complex problem: The bunjee jump project. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A klaidescope of windows. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problems? Mathematical practices and products in Grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 487–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 59–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. G. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977–1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. G. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive ability or practice. Science Education, 81, 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & McGinn, M. G. (1998). Inscriptions: Towards a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soufalis, N., Gianatti, S., Gianatti, F., Stocklmayer, S., Thomas, G., & Yeo, S. (1994a). Physics in context-Year 12. Perth, Australia: Science Teachers' Association of WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soufalis, N., Gianatti, S., Gianatti, F., Thomas, G., & Donaldson, P. (1994b). Physics investigations in context. Year 12. Perth, Australia: Science Teachers' Association of WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolnough, J. (1998). How do students learn to apply their mathematical knowledge to interpret graphs in physics? Research in Science Education, 30(3), 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Edith Cowan University, USA

    Patricia A. Forster

Authors
  1. Patricia A. Forster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forster, P.A. Graphing in Physics: Processes and Sources of Error in Tertiary Entrance Examinations in Western Australia. Research in Science Education 34, 239–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044597.10584.1a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044597.10584.1a

Search

Navigation