Skip to main content
Log in

Neglecting Disaster: Why Don't People Insure Against Large Losses?

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a theoretical explanation for the common observation that people often fail to purchase insurance against low-probability high-loss events even when it is offered at favorable premiums. We hypothesize that individuals maximize expected utility but face an explicit or implicit cost to discovering the true probability of rare events. This cost constitutes a threshold that may inhibit purchase but may be offset in several ways by suppliers of insurers and state regulators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Business Insurance. (2001). “Better Off Buying Life Insurance?” p. 8.

  • Baumol, William and Richard Quandt. (1964). “Rules of Thumb and Optimally Imperfect Decisions,” American Economic Review 54, 23-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk, John. (1996). “Why Bounded Rationality?” Journal of Economic Literature 34, 669-700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Neil. (2000). Integrated Risk Management. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freifelder, Leonard. (1975). “Statistical Decision Theory and Credibility Theory Procedures.” In P.M. Kahn (ed.), Credibility: Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press, 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froot, Kenneth, David Scharfstein, and Jeremy Stein. (1993). “Risk Management: Co-ordinating Investment and Financing Problems,” Journal of Finance 48, 1629-1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, Martin, Robert Klein, Paul Kleindorfer, and Michael Murray. (2003). Catastrophe Insurance: Consumer Demand, Markets and Regulation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, Robin and Kunreuther Howard. (1992). “Pricing Insurance and Warranties: Ambiguity and Correlated Risks,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 17, 36-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Oswald, Roman Wider, and Odilo Huber. (1997). “Active Information Search and Complete Information Presentation in Naturalistic Risky Decision Tasks,” Acta Psychologica 95, 15-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky. (eds.). (2000). Choice, Values, and Frames. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1921. Reprinted, New York, NY: Sentry Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, Nathan Novemsky, and Daniel Kahneman. (2001). “Making Low Probabilities Useful,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23, 103-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard. (1998). “Insurability Conditions and the Supply of Coverage.” In Howard, Kunreuther and Richard Roth Sr. (eds.), Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, Robin Hogarth, and Jacqueline Meszaros. (1993). “Insurer Ambiguity and Market Failure,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, Eugene and Gahagan Karen. (1998). “Hurricane Insurance Protection in Florida.” In Howard, Kunreuther and Richard Roth Sr. (eds.), Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, Dennis. (1971). Making Decisions. London: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumpower, Jeryl. (1991). “Risk, Ambiguity, Insurance, and the Winner's Curse,” Risk Analysis 11, 519-522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Mark. (1983). “Insurance Market Equilibria With Credibility Adjusted Premiums,” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Working Paper WP-83-26.

  • Phelps, Charles. (1997). Health Economics (2nd Edition). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, David. (1989). “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility Without Additivity,” Econometrica 57, 571-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, James. (1973). “A Theory of Capacity and the Insurance of Catastrophe Risks,” Journal of Risk and Insurance 40, 231-243 (Part I) and 339–355 (Part II).

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, Ola. (1981). “Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers Are?” Acta Psychologica 57, 143-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney. (1975). “Optimization and Evolution in the Theory of the Firm.” In R. H. Day and T. Groves (eds.), Adaptive Economic Models. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Pauly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. Neglecting Disaster: Why Don't People Insure Against Large Losses?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28, 5–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISK.0000009433.25126.87

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISK.0000009433.25126.87

Navigation