Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thirty Years After the Discovery of Gender: Psychological Concepts and Measures of Masculinity

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study of the construct of masculinity has undergone substantial change since the feminist critique of gender in the 1960–70s. This review focuses on constancies and changes within empirical psychological theories and measurement because measures represent masculinity and their underlying assumptions are often obscured. After a brief historical introduction, 5 distinct movements are identified by their assumptions. These movements discuss masculinity as a unipolar construct, an ideology, a source of strain, a socially constructed entity, and, most recently, as a blend of these different movements. The lack of developmental accounts of masculinity and the positioning of masculinity as an acontextual, superordinate organizing element of individual lives are also addressed. Concluding comments address the lack of influence by masculinity researchers on broader psychological thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

references

  • Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58, 5-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beere, C. A. (1990). Gender roles: A handbook of tests and measures. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1979). Theory and measurement of androgyny: A reply to the Pedhazur-Tetenbaum and Locksley-Colten critiques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1047-1054.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1997). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development. In T. Roberts (Ed.), The Lanahan readings in the psychology of women (pp. 539-552). Baltimore: Lanahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1973). Conceptions of sex role: Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 58, 512-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. H. (1984). Sex role identity and ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohan, J. S. (1997). Regarding gender: Essentialism, constructionism and feminist psychology. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 31-48). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1-48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunting, A. B., & Reeves, J. B. (1983). Perceived male sex orientation and beliefs about rape. Deviant Behavior, 58, 281-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 58, 164-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1989). Making gendered people: Bodies, identities, sexualities. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 449-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1992). A very straight gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, and the dynamics of gender. American Sociological Review, 58, 735-751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1993). The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society, 58, 597-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 58, 389-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's worth of research on gender. American Psychologist, 58, 105-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 788-827). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 58, 369-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 58, 145-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M. (1995). The relationship between masculine gender role stress and men's health risk: The validation of a construct. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 207-225). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification, 58, 123-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, N. L., Almeida, D. M., & Petersen, A. C. (1990). Masculinity, femininity, and sex role attitudes in early adolescence: Exploring gender intensification. Child Development, 58, 1905-1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. (1999). Lost boys: Why our sons turn violent and how we can save them. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1990). On making a difference. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 1-21). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. C. (1995). African-American and Anglo-American gender identities: An empirical study. Journal of Black Psychology, 58, 182-194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1990). Issues in the assessment of the self-concept of children and adolescents. In A. M. LaGreca (Ed.), Through the eyes of the child (pp. 292-325). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1951). Manual for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. (1995). The romance of American psychology: Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Plant, E. A. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences. Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50, 159-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1997). Masculinity as homophobia: Fear, shame, and silence in the construction of gender identity. In M. M. Gergen & S. N. Davis (Eds.), Toward a new psychology of gender (pp. 223-242). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, O. E. (1962). Heroes, villains, and fools: Reflections of the American character. San Diego, CA: Aegis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 573-660). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 58, 379-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (2, Serial No. 269).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisak, D. (2000). Editorial. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 58, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Journal of Men and Masculinity, 58, 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 58, 4-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50, 162-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 58, 196-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (2001, November). Masculinity in crisis: Are there limits to gender? Paper presented at the University of New Hampshire, Durham.

  • Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 150-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, J. M. (2002, August). Twenty years of gender-role conflict research: Summary of 130 studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

  • O'Neil, J. M., Egan, J., Owen, S. V., & McBride, V. (1993). The Gender Role Journey measure: Scale development and psychometric evaluation. Sex Roles, 58, 167-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neil, J. M., Helms, B. J., Gable, R. K., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1986). Gender-Role Conflict Scale: College men's fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 58, 335-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. F., & Reese, H. W. (1981). Conceptual prerequisites for an understanding of stability-change and continuity-discontinuity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 58, 99-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1987). The theory of male sex-role identity: Its rise and fall, 1936 to the present. In H. Brod (Ed.), The making of masculinities: The new men's studies (pp. 21-38). Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Attitudes toward male roles: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles, 58, 481-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotundo, E. A. (1993). American manhood: Transformations in masculinity from the revolution to the modern era. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, R. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, P. N. (1994). American cool: Constructing a twentieth-century emotional style. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, E. K. J. (1936). Interests of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 49-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1995). Masculinity ideologies: A review of research instrumentation on men and masculinities. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 129-163). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, K. (1996). Manhood at Harvard: William James and others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. K. (1990). Imperfect reflections of reality: Psychology constructs gender. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 102-149). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villemez, W. J., & Touhey, J. C. (1977). A measure of individual differences in sex stereotyping and sex discrimination: The “Macho” scale. Psychological Reports, 58, 411-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C. (1998). Male reference group identity dependence: A theory of male identity. Counseling Psychologist, 58, 349-383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C. (2001). Professional men's attitudes toward race and gender equity. Journal of Men's Studies, 58, 73-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C., & Brittan-Powell, C. (2001). Men's attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender-related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 58, 42-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, J. C., & Gelso, C. J. (1998). Reference Group Identity Dependence scale: A measure of male identity. Counseling Psychologist, 58, 384-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbuch, M., Beal, D., & O'Neal, E. C. (1999). How masculine ought I be? Men's masculinity and aggression. Sex Roles, 58, 583-592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire

    Andrew P. Smiler

Authors
  1. Andrew P. Smiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smiler, A.P. Thirty Years After the Discovery of Gender: Psychological Concepts and Measures of Masculinity. Sex Roles 50, 15–26 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011069.02279.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011069.02279.4c

Search

Navigation