Skip to main content
Log in

Factors That Influence Attitudes Toward Women with Tattoos

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to examine undergraduate students' attitudes toward women with tattoos. A basic scenario was written to act as the base description and the control stimulus. The independent variables “size of tattoo” and “visibility of tattoo” were manipulated. Attitudes were measured using the Semantic Differential (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1958), which was presented after the scenario. The Neosexism Scale (Tougas, Brown, Beaton, & Joly, 1995) and the Feminism and the Women's Movement Scale (FWM; Fassinger, 1994) followed. In our sample, 23% of women but only 12% of men were tattooed, which supports recent claims that women may be more than 50% of the individuals currently obtaining tattoos. Men and women both had more negative attitudes toward a woman with a visible tattoo than toward the other women in the descriptions. The size of the tattoo was a predictor of evaluation only for men and women who did not have tattoos themselves. Finally, participants with more conservative gender attitudes evaluated all women more negatively, beyond the effects already accounted for by gender differences. Future research directions are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

references

  • Armstrong, M. L. (1991). Career-oriented women with tattoos. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(4), 215-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. (2002). Pretty in ink: Conformity, resistance, and negotiation in women's tattooing. Sex Roles, 47, 219-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M., & Young, K. (2001). Flesh journeys: Neo primitives and the contemporary rediscovery of radical body modification. Deviant Behavior, 22, 117-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunberger, C. (2000). Revolting bodies: The monster beauty of tattooed women. NWSA Journal, 12(2), 1-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. M., Perlmutter, P., & McDermott, R. J. (2000). Youth and tattoos: What school health personnel should know. Journal of School Health, 70, 355-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, K., Harmon, M. P., Verner, B., & Tonn, A. (1993). Tattoos and male alliances. Human Nature, 4, 199-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copes, J. H., & Forsyth, C. J. (1998). The tattoo: A social psychological explanation. International Review of Modern Sociology, 23, 83-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMello, M. (2000). Bodies of inscription: A cultural history of the modern tattoo community. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, K. T. (1998). A mind of her own: Effects of need for closure and gender on reactions to nonconformity. Sex Roles, 38, 801-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassinger, R. (1994). Development and testing of the Attitudes toward Feminism and the Women's Movement (FWM) Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389-402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1994). I love Mom: An irreverent history of the tattoo. Toronto, Ontario: Key Porter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, S. J., Durkin, K., Parry, E., Turbett, Y., & Odgers, P. (1996). Amateur tattooing practices and beliefs among high school adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 19, 420-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, C., & Nielsen, J. M. (1998). Gender, residual deviance, and social control. Deviant Behavior, 19, 339-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mifflin, M. (1997). Bodies of subversion: A secret history of women and tattoo. New York: Juno Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1958). The measurement of meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, J. (1996). Women and tattoos: Image and reality. Unpublished MA thesis, Western Washington University.

  • Rosenfield, S. (1982). Sex roles and societal reactions to mental illness: The labelling of ‘deviant’ deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 18-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1986). Media violence, anti-social behavior, and the social consequences of small effects. Journal of Social Issues, 42(3), 141-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A. (Ed.). (1988). Marks of civilization: Artistic transformations of the human body. Los Angeles: University of California, Museum of Cultural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. R. (1988). Marks of mischief: Becoming and being tattooed. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 16, 395-432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. R. (1989). Customizing the body: The art and culture of tattooing. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scutt, R. W. B., & Gotch, C. (1974). Art, sex, and symbol: The mystery of tattooing. New York: Barnes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, L., Butler, J., & MacGrogan, M. (Eds.). (1993). Erotic welfare: Sexual theory and politics in the age of epidemic. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, S. (1990). Bad boys and tough tattoos: A social history of the tattoo with gangs, sailors, and street-corner punks (1950–1965). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842-849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wroblewski, C. (1992). Tattooed women. London: Virgin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlene Y. Senn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkes, D., Senn, C.Y. & Thorn, C. Factors That Influence Attitudes Toward Women with Tattoos. Sex Roles 50, 593–604 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027564.83353.06

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000027564.83353.06

Navigation