Abstract
An important aspect of a best management practices (BMP) program is providing credible information on the extent to which BMPs are being applied within the state. This paper, summarizing the responses of a survey to states about their BMP monitoring program, indicates nearly three of four states in the eastern U.S. have monitoring programs to determine if voluntary or mandatory forest practices are being applied. BMP compliance monitoring programs vary extensively among states in such areas as: the agency(s) responsible for undertaking the monitoring, the types of practices monitored, reasons for establishing the monitoring program, and the frequency and costs of compliance monitoring implementation. The survey found that information from compliance monitoring is used to modify forest practice rules or guidelines, redirect education and training programs, and inform policy makers and the general public of forest practice application rates. Major issues associated with implementing compliance monitoring programs as indicated by the survey include: specifying the types of information to be gathered, selecting harvest sites, accessing private property, determining monitoring responsibility, and reporting and using the information collected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blinn, C. R. and Kilgore, M. A.: 2001, ‘Riparian management practices: A summary of state guidelines’, Journal of Forestry 99(8), 11–17.
Brown, T. C., Brown, D. and Binkley D.: 1993, ‘Laws and programs for controlling nonpoint source pollution in forested areas’, Water Resources Bulletin 29(1): 1–13.
Ellefson, P. V., Cheng, A. S. and Moulton, R. J.: 1995, Regulation of Private Forestry Practices by State Governments, Station Bulletin 605–1995, MN, Agricultural Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, 225 pp.
Fortunate, N., Heffernan, P., Sanger, K. and Tootell, C.: 1998, Montana Forestry Best Management Practices Monitoring: 1998 Forestry BMP Audits Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Forestry Division, Missoula, MT, 40 pp.
Henson, M.: 1996, Best Management Practices: Implementation and Effectiveness Survey on Timber Operations in North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of Forest Resources, Raleigh, NC, 20 pp.
Kilgore, M. A. and Blinn, C. R.: 2003, ‘Policy tools to encourage the application of timber harvesting guidelines in the United States and Canada’, Forest Policy and Economics (in press).
MN Forest Resources Council: 1997, Options for Forest Practice Implementation Monitoring in Minnesota: Background Report, MFRC-B-2, St. Paul, MN, 36 pp.
National Association of State Foresters: 1996, State Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Programs for Silviculture: 1996 Progress Report, Washington, D.C., 23 pp.
National Research Council: 1998, Forested Landscapes in Perspective: Prospects and Opportunities for Sustainable Management of America's Nonfederal Forests, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 249 pp.
Johnson, J. and Ernst, D.: 1996, Indiana's Forestry Best Management Practices: 1996 BMP Implementation Study Report of Findings, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, Indianapolis, IN. 26 pp.
Koehn, S.W. and Grizzel, J. D.: 1995, Forestry Best Management Practices: An Assessment and Analysis Report on BMP Implementation in Maryland, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Forest Service, Annapolis, IN, 32 pp.
Tanz, J. S. and Campbell, W. L. C.: 1994, ‘Principles and perils of silvicultural audits’, Forestry Chronicle 70(1): 43–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilgore, M.A., Ellefson, P.V. & Phillips, M.J. BMP compliance monitoring programs in the Eastern United States. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 119–130 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012824.61640.22
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012824.61640.22