Abstract
The implications of global warming for the performance of six U.S. water resource systems are evaluated. The six case study sites represent a range of geographic and hydrologic, as well as institutional and social settings. Large, multi-reservoir systems (Columbia River, Missouri River, Apalachicola-Chatahoochee-Flint (ACF) Rivers), small, one or two reservoir systems (Tacoma and Boston) and medium size systems (Savannah River) are represented. The river basins range from mountainous to low relief and semi-humid to semi-arid, and the system operational purposes range from predominantly municipal to broadly multi-purpose. The studies inferred, using a chain of climate downscaling, hydrologic and water resources systems models, the sensitivity of six water resources systems to changes in precipitation, temperature and solar radiation. The climate change scenarios used in this study are based on results from transient climate change experiments performed with coupled ocean-atmosphere General Circulation Models (GCMs) for the 1995 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment. An earlier doubled-CO2 scenario from one of the GCMs was also used in the evaluation. The GCM scenarios were transferred to the local level using a simple downscaling approach that scales local weather variables by fixed monthly ratios (for precipitation) and fixed monthly shifts (for temperature). For those river basins where snow plays an important role in the current climate hydrology (Tacoma, Columbia, Missouri and, to a lesser extent, Boston) changes in temperature result in important changes in seasonal streamflow hydrographs. In these systems, spring snowmelt peaks are reduced and winter flows increase, on average. Changes in precipitation are generally reflected in the annual total runoff volumes more than in the seasonal shape of the hydrographs. In the Savannah and ACF systems, where snow plays a minor hydrological role, changes in hydrological response are linked more directly to temperature and precipitation changes. Effects on system performance varied from system to system, from GCM to GCM, and for each system operating objective (such as hydropower production, municipal and industrial supply, flood control, recreation, navigation and instream flow protection). Effects were generally smaller for the transient scenarios than for the doubled CO2 scenario. In terms of streamflow, one of the transient scenarios tended to have increases at most sites, while another tended to have decreases at most sites. The third showed no general consistency over the six sites. Generally, the water resource system performance effects were determined by the hydrologic changes and the amount of buffering provided by the system's storage capacity. The effects of demand growth and other plausible future operational considerations were evaluated as well. For most sites, the effects of these non-climatic effects on future system performance would about equal or exceed the effects of climate change over system planning horizons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, E. A.: 1973, National Weather Service River Forecast System — Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO-17, November.
Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A.: 1973, A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System: Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers, U.S. National Weather Service, Sacramento, CA.
COE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): 1989, Post-Authorization Change Notification Report on the Reallocation of Storage from Hydropower to Water Supply at Lake Lanier, Georgia, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, Mobile, AL.
COE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): 1991a, HEC-PRM Program Description, HEC, Davis, CA.
COE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): 1991b, Missouri River System Analysis Model — Phase I, PR-15, HEC, Davis, CA.
COE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers): 1994, National Study of Water Management During Drought: The New England Drought Study: Trigger Planning, New England Division, May.
Cubasch, U., Hasselmann, K., Hock, H., Maier-Reimer, E., Mikolajewicz, U., Santer, B. D., and Sausen, R.: 1992, ‘Time-Dependent Greenhouse Warming Computations with a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model’, Clim. Dyn. 8, 55-69.
Cubasch, U., Meehl, G., and Zhao, Z. C.: 1994, IPCC WGI Initiative on Evaluation of Regional Climate Change, Summary Report, p. 12.
Greco, S., Moss, R. H., Viner, D., and Jenne, R.: 1994, Climate Scenarios and Socioeconomic Projections for IPCC WG II Assessment, Working Document for WG II lead authors, printed by Consortium of International Earth Science Information Network, May.
Hamlet, A., Lettenmaier, D., and Nijssen, B.: 1997, Effects of Climate Shift on Water Resources Objectives in the Columbia Basin, Report to JISAO/SMA Climate Impacts Group, July.
Hashimoto, T., Stedinger, J. R., and Loucks, D. P.: 1982, ‘Reliability, Resiliency, and Vulnerability Criteria for Water Resource System Performance Evaluation’, Water Resour. Res. 16, 14-20.
Hasselmann, K., Sausen, R., Maier-Reimer, E., and Voss, R.: 1992, ‘On the Cold-Start Problem in Transient Simulations with Coupled-Atmosphere Models’, Clim. Dyn. 9, 53-61.
Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K.: 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 572.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1990, Emissions Scenarios Prepared by the Response Strategies Working Group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Report of the Expert Group on Emission Scenarios.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1992, Climate Change 1992: The Supplemental Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A., and Varney, S. U. (eds.), WMO/UNEP, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 200.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), WMO/UNEP, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 572.
Karpack, L. M. and Palmer, R. N.: 1992, The Use of Simulation Modeling to Evaluate the Effect of Regionalization on Water System Performance, University of Washington Department of Civil Engineering Water Resources Series Technical Report No. 134, March.
Kittel, T. G. F., Giorgi, F., and Meehl, G. A.: 1998, ‘Intercomparison of Regional Biases and Doubled CO2-Sensitivity of Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model Experiments’, Clim. Dyn. 14(1), 1-15.
Lettenmaier, D. P. and Gan, T-Y.: 1990, ‘Hydrologic Sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin, California, to Global Warming’, Water Resour. Res. 26, 69-86.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Fisher, S. M., Palmer, R. N., Millard, S. P., Hughes, J. P., Wood, A. W., and Sias, J. C.: 1998a, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 1. The Tacoma Water Supply, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Keizur, A. E., Palmer, R. N., Wood, A. W., and Fisher, S. M.: 1998b, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 2. The Boston Water Supply System, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, A.W., Palmer, R. N., Hughes, J. P., Millard, S. P., and Fisher, S. M.: 1998c, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 3. The Savannah River System, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Ford, D., Nijssen, B., Hughes, J. P., Millard, S. P., Fisher, S. M., and Sias, J. C.: 1998d, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 4. The Columbia River System, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Ford, D., Wood, E. F., Fisher, S. M., and Sias, J. C.: 1998e, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 5. The Missouri River System, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Ford, D., Wood, E. F., Fisher, S. M., and Wood, A.W.: 1998f, Water Management Implications of Global Warming: 6. The Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River System, Report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
Manabe, S., Stouffer, R. J., Spelman, M. J., and Bryan, K.: 1991, ‘Transient Responses of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Gradual Changes of Atmospheric CO2. Part 1: Annual Mean Response’, J. Climate 4, 785-818.
Manabe, S., Spelman, M. J., and Stouffer, R. J.: 1992, ‘Transient Responses of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Gradual Changes of Atmospheric CO2. Part 2: Seasonal Response’, J. Climate 5, 105-126.
Murphy, J. M.: 1995, ‘Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part I: Control Climate and Flux Correction’, J. Climate 8, 36-56.
Murphy, J.M. and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1995, ‘Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part II: Spatial and Temporal Structure of the Response’, J. Climate 8, 57-80.
MWRA/MDC (Massachusetts Water Resources Authority and Commonwealth of Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission): 1989, Drought Management Plan (Draft), Boston, MA, February.
Nijssen, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., Wetzel, S. W., and Wood, E. F.: 1997, ‘Streamflow Simulation for Continental-Scale Watersheds’, Water Resour. Res. 33, 711-724.
Palmer, R. N., Rowden, W., Trungale, J., and Hamlet, A.: 1995, Documentation for the Modified Schematic Models, Report to the Basinwide Working Group of the ACT/ACF Study, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, September.
PMCL (Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd.): 1994, IWR-MAIN, Water Demand Analysis Software Version 6.0, Planning and Management Consultants, Ltd., Carbondale, IL.
Smith, J. B. and Tirpak, D. A. (eds.): 1989, The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States: Appendix A — Water Resources, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, May.
U.S. Country Studies Management Team: 1994, Guidance for Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments, Version 1.0, U.S. Country Studies Program, Washington, D.C., October.
Viner, D., Hulme, M., and Raper, S. C. B.: 1994, Climate Change Scenarios for the IPCC Working Group II Impacts Assessment, Climate Impacts LINK Technical Note 6, Climate Research Unit, Norwich, U.K.
Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., and Moss, R. H.: 1996, Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 879.
Whetton, P., England, M., O'Farrell, S., Waterson. I., and Pittock, B.: 1996, ‘Global Comparison of the Regional Rainfall Results of Enhanced Greenhouse Coupled and Mixed Layer Ocean Experiments: Implications for Climate Change Scenario Development’, Clim. Change 33, 497-519.
Wigley, T.M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 1992, ‘Implications for Climate and Sea-Level of Revised IPCC Emissions Scenarios’, Nature 357, 293-300.
Wood, A. W., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Palmer, R. N.: 1997, ‘Assessing Climate Change Implications for Water Resources Planning’, Clim. Change 37, 203-228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lettenmaier, D.P., Wood, A.W., Palmer, R.N. et al. Water Resources Implications of Global Warming: A U.S. Regional Perspective. Climatic Change 43, 537–579 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005448007910
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005448007910