Skip to main content
Log in

Group Decision and Negotiation in Strategy Making

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a large number of organisations effective delivery of strategy depends upon the psychological and emotional commitment of the Top Management Team (TMT) thus involving group negotiation and decision making. Computer based group support promoting open debate and developing commitment is therefore important and illustrated through examples from the presenter's large number of strategic interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, F., and C. Eden. (1997). “Contrasting GDSS's and GDSS in the Context of Strategic Change: Implications for Facilitation, ” Journal of Decision Systems 6(3) 221–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann, F., and C. Eden. (1999). Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems. In G.J. De Vreede and F. Ackermann (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Euro GDSS, Copenhagen, 22nd June, pp 83–108.

  • Andersen, D.F., G.P. Richardson, J. Rohrbaugh, A. Zagonel dos Santos, and T.P. Lee. (2000). The Impact of US Welfare Reform on States and Counties: Group facilitated >system dynamics modeling, policy analysis, and implementation’ presented at the Group Decision and Negotiation Conference, Glasgow, July 3– 6.

  • Collins, B., and H.A. Guetzkow. (1964). A Social Psychology of Processes for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. L.M. Jessup, and J.S. Valacich. (1990). “Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups, ” Management Science 36(6) 689–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., and R.B. Gallupe. (1987). “A Foundation for Group Decision Support System Design, ” Management Science 33, 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C. (1992). “A Framework for Thinking About Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS), ” Group Decision and Negotiation, 1199–1218.

  • Eden, C. (1995). “On the Evaluation of ‘Wide-Band’ GDSS's, ” European Journal of Operational Research 81, 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1996). “Horses for Courses – a stakeholder view of the evaluation of GDSS's, ” Group Decision and Negotiation 5(4,5,6) 501–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (1999). The Role of GDSS in Scenario Development and Strategy Making. In Fifth International Workshop on Groupware, CRIWG’ 99. IEEE Press. Cancun, Mexico. September. ISBN: 0-7695-0268-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (2000a). “Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach, ” Journal of Operational Research Society 51, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., and F. Ackermann. (2000b). “Emergent Strategizing, ” in A. Huff and M. Jenkins (eds.), Mapping Strategic Thinking. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). “Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High Velocity Environments, ” Academy of Management Journal 32, 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., and S. Brown. (1988). Getting Together: Building a Relationship that Gets to Yes. Boston, Mass: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., and W. Ury. (1982). Getting to Yes. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S.W., and B. Wooldridge. (1992). “Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation, ” Academy of Management Review 6(4), 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., and M.K. Konovsky. (1989). “Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay decisions, ” Academy of Management Journal 32, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, Mass.: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W.D., and I.C. MacMillan. (1986). “Strategy Implementation versus Middle Management Self Interest, ” Strategic Management Journal, 7313–7327.

  • Harvey, J. (1988). “The Abilene Paradox: The Management of Agreement, ” Organizational Dynamics Summer, 17–34.

  • Harvey-Jones, J. (1988). Making It Happen, Reflections on Leadership. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. (1972). Victims of Group Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., and L. Mann. (1977). Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L.M., and D.A. Tansik. (1991). “Decision Making in an Automated Environment: The Effects of Anonymity and Proximity with a Group Decision Support System, ” Decision Science 22, 266–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.C., and R.A. Mauborgne. (1991). “Implementing Global Strategies: The Role of Procedural Justice, ” Strategic Management Journal 12, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.C., and R.A. Mauborgne. (1993). “Procedural Justice, Attitudes, and Subsidiary Top Management Compliance with Multinationals’ Corporate Strategic Decisions, ” Academy of Management Journal June, 502–526.

  • Kim, W.C., and R.A. Mauborgne. (1995). “A Procedural Justice Model of Strategic Decision Making, ” Organization Science, 644–661.

  • Korsgaard, M.A., D.M. Schweiger, and H.J. Sapienza. (1995). “Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice, ” Academy of Management Journal 38, 60–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., and W. Li. (1990). “Psychological Mechanisms of Process-Control Effects, ” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75613–75620.

  • Lind, E.A., R. Kanfer, and P.C. Earley. (1990). “Voice, Control, and Procedural Justice: Instrumental and Noninstrumental Concerns in Fairness Judgments, ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59952–59959.

  • McFarlin, D.B., and P.D. Sweeney. (1992). “Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes, ” Academy of Management Journal 35, 626–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangham, I.L., and M.A. Overington. (1987). Organizations as Theatre: A Social Psychology of Dramatic Appearances. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunamaker, J.F., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, and D.R. Vogel. (1991). “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work, ” Communications of the ACM 34, 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A.F. (1953). Applied Imagination. New York.

  • Peters, T.J., and R.H. Waterman. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsonneault, A., H. Barki, R.B. Gallupe, and N. Hoppen. (1999). “Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity, ” Information Systems Research 10(2), 110–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimond, P., and C. Eden. (1990). “Making Strategy Work, ” International Journal of Strategic Management 23(5) 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, P. (1991). The Art of the Long View. New York, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenk, C. (1984). “Cognitive Simplification Processes in Strategic Decision Making, ” Strategic Management Journal 5111–5128.

  • Simon, H.A. (1976). “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality, ” in S.J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. (2000). Exploring How People Share Knowledge During Group Work Using Computer Technology. Presented at the Group Decision and Negotiation Conference, Glasgow, July 3–6.

  • Strauss, A., and L. Schatzman. (1963). “The Hospital and its Negotiated Order, ” in Friedson (ed.), The Hospital in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and J. Walker. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ,: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, K. (1996) Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix, J.A. (1996) Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning using System Dyanamics. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G. (1983). The Art of Judgement. London: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack, P. (1985). “Scenarios, Uncharted Waters Ahead, ” Harvard Business Review September–October, 73–89.

  • Wack, P. (1987). “Scenarios, Shooting the Rapids, ” Harvard Business Review July–August, 139–150.

  • Woolridge, S.W., and B. Floyd. (1990). “The Strategy Process, Middle Management Involvement, and Organizational Performance, ” Strategic Management Journal, 11231–11241.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eden, C., Ackermann, F. Group Decision and Negotiation in Strategy Making. Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 119–140 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008710816126

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008710816126

Keywords

Navigation