Skip to main content
Log in

Insights into the Oxidation Chemistry of SiOC Ceramics Derived from Silsesquioxanes

  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have undertaken a systematic study of the oxidation chemistry for a range of SiOC ceramics derived from silsesquioxane polymeric precursors. This study examines the oxidation for 500 hours at 600, 800, 1000 and 1200°C for four SiOC powders. The material changes upon oxidation were characterized qualitatively by color change and optical microscopy and quantitatively by weight and composition change. In this study we employ a very easy method that uses the weight change upon oxidation and a carbon analysis after oxidation to arrive at the composition of the oxidized SiOC. Combined these qualitative and quantitative techniques have shown that on oxidation at 800 and 600°C the SiOC composition is more rapidly changed to that of silica than oxidation over the same time frame at 1000 or 1200°C. The data indicates that this difference is due to the relative rates of oxidation of the excess carbon versus the Si—C bonds in the SiOC. At lower temperatures initially the carbon oxidation predominates which leads to higher porosity throughout the material and an increase in the surface area with eventually ‘complete’ oxidation to silica. At higher temperatures the Si—C bond oxidation rate is comparable to the rate of oxidation of carbon. This allows a silica-like surface to build up on the SiOC, which slows all subsequent reactions due to the necessity to diffuse O2 in and COx out of the bulk. Under these oxidation conditions materials that originally contain high amounts of excess carbon are more quickly oxidized to silica than those that contain minimal amounts of excess carbon, as confirmed by elemental analysis and optical microscopy. Regardless of the time or temperature of the oxidation conditions no materials were found to be completely stable to oxidation. SiOC materials with low levels of excess carbon showed the best resistance to change upon oxidation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Chi, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 4, 704–717 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.A. White, S.M. Oleff, R.D. Boyer, P.A. Budinger, and J.R. Fox, Adv. Ceram. Mater. 2, 45–59 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Zang and C.G. Pantano, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 958–963 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F.I. Hurwitz, J.Z. Gyekenyesi, P.J. Conroy, and A.L. Rivera, Ceram. Eng. Soc. Proc. 11, 931–946 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.N. Adler, Int. SAMPE Symp. Exhibit 41, 524–531 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L.M. Manocha and S.M. Manocha, Carbon 33, 435–440 (1995); (b) M. Harris, T. Chaudhary, L. Drzal, and R.M. Laine, Mater. Sci. and Eng. 195A, 223–226 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Xing, A.M. Wilson, K. Eguchi, G.A. Zank, and J.R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 2410–2416 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See http://www.ccr.jussieu.fr/lcmc/Tmr/SiOC.html.

  9. D.R. Bujalski, S. Grigoras, W.-L. Lee, G.M. Wieber, and G.A. Zank, J. Mater. Chem. 8(6), 1427–1433 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.M. Renlund, S. Prochazka, and S. Doremus, J. Mater. Res. 6, 2716–2722 (1991); (b) G.M. Renlund, S. Prochazka, and S. Doremus, J. Mater. Res. 6, 2723–2730 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Zhang and C.G. Pantano, Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 271, 783–788 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.T. Burns, R.B. Taylor, Y. Xu, A. Zangvil, and G.A. Zank, Chem. Mater. 4, 1313–1320 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.D. Soraru, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2, 843–848 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.J.P. Corriu, D. LeClercq, P.H. Mutin, and A. Vioux, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 4, 327–337 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.A.B. Meador, F.I. Hurwitz, and S.T. Gonczy, Ceram. Eng. Soc. Proc. 17, 394–400 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.T. Burns, T.P. Angelotti, L.F. Hanneman, G. Chandra, and J.H. Moore, J. Mater. Sci. 22, 2609–2676 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F.I. Hurwitz, P. Heimann, S.C. Farmer, and D.M. Hembree, J. Mater. Sci. 28, 6622–6630 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.H. Baney, K. Eguchi, and G.A. Zank, Soc. Chem. Japan 8, 23–28 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.M. Manocha, D.Y. Vashistha, and S.M. Manocha, Mater. Sci. Forum 223–224, 127–132 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Dacic and S. Marinkovic, Carbon 25, 409–415 (1987); (b) P.L. Walker, Carbon 28, 261–279 (1990); (c) T.-M. Wu, W.-C. Wei, and S.-E. Hsu, Carbon 29, 1257–1265 (1991); (d) S.M. Gee and J.A. Little, J. Mater. Sci. 26, 1093–1100 (1991); (e) B. Dacic and S. Marinkovic, Carbon 25, 409–415 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brewer, C.M., Bujalski, D.R., Parent, V.E. et al. Insights into the Oxidation Chemistry of SiOC Ceramics Derived from Silsesquioxanes. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology 14, 49–68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008723813991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008723813991

Navigation