Abstract
The paper examines how firms in three regional clusters in Norway dominated by shipbuilding, mechanical engineering and electronics industry, respectively exploit both place-specific local resources as well as external, world-class knowledge to strengthen their competitiveness. From these case-studies we make four points: (1) Ideal-typical regional innovation systems, i.e., regional clusters ‘surrounded’ by supporting local organisations, is rather uncommon in Norway. (2) External contacts, outside of the local industrial milieu, are crucial in innovation processes also in many SMEs. (3) Innovation processes may nevertheless be regarded as regional phenomena in regional clusters, as regional resources and collaborative networks often have decisive significance for firms' innovation activity. (4) Regional resources include in particular place-specific, contextual knowledge of both tacit and codified nature, that, in combination, is rather geographically immobile.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asheim, B.T., 1998, ‘Learning Regions as Development Coalitions: Partnership as Governance in European Workfare States?’ Paper presented at the Second European Urban and Regional Studies Conference on ‘Culture, place and space in contemporary Europe’, University of Durham, UK.
Asheim, B.T. and A. Isaksen, 1997, ‘Localisation, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards Regional Innovation Systems in Norway?’ European Planning Studies 5 (3), 299-330.
Asheim, B.T. and G. Pedersen, 1999, ‘TESA-A Development Coalition Within a Learning Region,’ in R. Ennals and B. Gustavsen (eds.), Work Organisation and Europe as a Development Coalition Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, pp. 108-119.
Cooke, P., 1998, ‘Introduction. Origins of the Concept,’ in H.-J. Braczyk et al. (eds.), Regional Innovation Systems, London: UCL Press, pp. 2-25.
Isaksen, A. and O.R. Spilling, 1996, Regional utvikling og små bedrifter, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget.
Lawson, C. and E. Lorenz, 1999, ‘Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity’, Regional Studies 33 (4), 305-317.
Lundvall, B-Å. and S. Borrás, 1997, ‘The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy’, Report from DG XII, Commission of the European Union.
Malmberg, A., 1997, ‘Industrial Geography: Location and Learning’, Progress in Human Geography 21 (4), 573-582.
Maskell, P., H. Eskebinen, I. Hannibalsson, A. Malmberg and E. Vatne, 1998, Competitiveness, Localised Learning and Regional Development. Specilisation and Prosperity in Small Open Economies, London/New York: Routlegde.
Pike, A. and J. Tomaney, 1999, ‘The Limits to Localization in Declining Industrial Regions? Trans-National Corporations and Economic Development in Sedgefield Borough’, European Planning Studies 7 (4), 407-428.
Porter, M., 1998, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review Nov./Dec. 77-90.
Rosenfeld, S.A., 1997. ‘Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development’, European Planning Studies 5 (1) 3-23.
Wicken, O., 1994, ‘Entreprenørskap i Møre og Romsdal: Et historisk perspektiv’, STEP Report 17/94, STEP Group, Oslo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asheim, B.T., Isaksen, A. Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer 27, 77–86 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794