Skip to main content
Log in

Early Warning Fire Detection System Using a Probabilistic Neural Network

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Navy program, Damage Control-Automation for Reduced Manning is focused on enhancing automation of ship functions and damage control systems. A key element to this objective is the improvement of current fire detection systems. As in many applications, it is desired to increase detection sensitivity and,more importantly increase the reliability of the detection system through improved nuisance alarm immunity. Improved reliability is needed, such that fire detection systems can automatically control fire suppression systems. The use of multi-criteria based detection technology continues to offer the most promising means to achieve both improved sensitivity to real fires,and reduced susceptibility to nuisance alarm sources. A multi-criteria early warning fire detection system, has been developed to provide reliable warning of actual fire conditions, in less time, with fewer nuisance alarms,than can be achieved with commercially available smoke detection systems. In this study a four-sensor array and a Probabilistic Neural Network have been used to produce an early warning fire detection system. A prototype early warning fire detector was built and tested in a shipboard environment. The current alarm algorithm resulted in better overall performance than the commercial smoke detectors, by providing both improved nuisance source immunity with generally equivalent or faster response times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.T. Gottuk and F.W. Williams, “Multi-Criteria Fire Detection: A Review of the State-of-the-Art,” NRL Letter Report Ser. 6180/0472, September 10, 1998.

  2. AUBE '99, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999.

  3. AUBE '01, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, March 26–28, 2001.

  4. G. Pfister, “Multisensor/Multicriteria Fire Detection: A New Trend Rapidly Becomes State of the Art,” Fire Technology Second Quarter, vol. 33,no. 2, 1997, pp. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.W. Bukowski and P.A. Reneke, “New Approaches to the Interpretation of Signals from Fire Sensors,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999, pp. 11-21.

  6. H.J. Keding, L. Heckt, and G. Borcherding, SamDetect—EIN intelligeter Brand-und Gefahrstoffsensor, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999, pp. 226-236.

  7. L. Wang, C. Zhu, and J. Wang, “A New Type of Intelligent Point Photoelectric Smoke-Heat Combined Fire Detector,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999, pp. 262-271.

  8. H. Muller, “A New Approach to Fire Detection Algorithms Based on the Hidden Markov Model,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, March 26–28, 2001, pp. 129-138.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.T. Gottuk, M.J. Peatross, R.J. Roby, and C.L. Beyler, “Advanced Fire Detection Using Multi-signature Alarm Algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, Duisburg, Germany, March 16–18, 1999, pp 237.

  10. J.A. Milke and T.J. McAvoy, “Analysis of Signature Patterns for Discriminating Fire Detection with Multiple Sensors,” Fire Technology, vol. 31,no. 2, 1999, pp. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Milke, “Monitoring Multiple Aspects of Fire Signatures for Discriminating Fire Detection,” Fire Technology, vol. 36,no. 3, 1999, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SamDetect, Daimler-Benz Aerospace, RST Rostock Raumfahrt und Umweltschutz GmbH, Friedrich-Barnewitz-Str. 7, D-18119 Warnemünde.

  13. M, Harms, J. Goschnick, and R. Young, “Early Detection and Distinction of Fire Gases with a Gas Sensor Microarray,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automatic Fire Detection, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, March 26–28, 2001, pp. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, R.E. Shaffer, S.J. Hart, F.W. Williams, D.T. Gottuk, S.A. Hill, and B.D. Strehlen, “Multi-Criteria Fire Detection Systems using a Probabilistic Neural Network,” Sensors and Actuators, B, vol. 69,no. 3, 2000, pp. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.T. Gottuk, S.A. Hill, C.F. Schemel, B.D. Strehlen, R.E. Shaffer, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Identification of Fire Signatures for Shipboard Multi-criteria Fire Detection Systems,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6180-99-8386, June 18, 1999.

  16. R.E. Shaffer, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, C. Barry, D.T. Gottuk, and F.W. Williams, “Development of an Early Warning Multi-Criteria Fire Detection System: Analysis of Transient Fire Signatures Using a Probabilistic Neural Network,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6110-00-8429, February 16, 2000.

  17. H.W. Carhart, T.A. Toomey, and F.W. Williams, “The ex-USS SHADWELL Full-Scale Fire Research and Test Ship,” NRL Memorandum Report, 6074, October 1987, Reissue, September, 1992.

  18. J.T. Wong, D.T. Gottuk, R.E. Shaffer, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Results of Multi-Criteria Fire Detection System Tests,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6180-00-8452, May 22, 2000.

  19. S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, R.E. Shaffer, J.T. Wong, D.T. Gottuk, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Analysis of Multi-Criteria Fire Detection Systems Results for Test Series 1,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6110-00-8484, September 18, 2000.

  20. M.T. Wright, D.T. Gottuk, J.T. Wong, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Prototype Early Warning Fire Detection System: Test Series 1 Results,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6180-00-8486, September 18, 2000.

  21. S.J. Hart, M.H. Hammond, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, R.E. Shaffer, J.T. Wong, D.T. Gottuk, M.T. Wright, T.T. Street, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Real-Time Probabilistic Neural Network Performance and Optimization for Fire Detection and Nuisance Alarm Rejection: Test Series 1 Results,” NRL Memorandum Report, NLR/MR/6110-00-8480, August 31, 2000.

  22. S.J. Hart, M.H. Hammond, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, J.T. Wong, D.T. Gottuk, M.T. Wright, and F.W. Williams, “Real-Time Classification Performance and Failure Mode Analysis of a Physical /Chemical Sensor Array and a Probabilistic Neural Network,” Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology, vol. 5, 2001, pp. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.T. Wright, D.T. Gottuk, J.T. Wong, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, M.H. Hammond, P.A. Tatem, T.T. Street, and F.W. Williams, “Prototype Early Warning Fire Detection System: Test Series 2 Results,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6180-00-8506, October 23, 2000.

  24. S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, M.H. Hammond, J.T. Wong, D.T. Gottuk, M.T. Wright, T.T. Street, P.A. Tatem, and F.W. Williams, “Real-Time Probabilistic Neural Network Performance and Optimization for Fire Detection and Nuisance Alarm Rejection: Test Series 2 Results,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6110-00-8499, October 10, 2000.

  25. M.T. Wright, D.T. Gottuk, J.T. Wong, H. Pham, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, S.J. Hart, M.H. Hammond, P.A. Tatem, T.T. Street, and F.W. Williams, “Prototype Early Warning Fire Detection System: Test Series 3 Results,” NRL Memorandum Report, NRL/MR/6180-01-8592, December 19, 2001.

  26. R.E. Shaffer, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, and R.A. McGill, “A Comparison Study of Chemical Sensor Array Pattern Recognition Algorithms,” Analytica Chimica Acta, 384, 1999, pp. 305-317.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.E. Shaffer, S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, and R.A. McGill, “Probabilistic Neural Networks for Chemical Sensor Array Pattern Recognition: Comparison Studies, Improvements and Automated Outlier Rejection,” Naval Research Laboratory Formal Report, 6110-98-9879, 1998.

  28. R.E. Shaffer and S.L. Rose-Pehrsson, “Improved Probabilistic Neural Network Algorithm for Chemical Sensor Array Pattern Recognition,” Analytical Chemistry, 1999, vol. 71,no. 9, pp. 4263-4271.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. Masters, Advanced Algorithms for Neural Networks A C++ Sourcebook, New York, Academic Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A.C. Luers, D.T. Gottuk, H.V. Pham, J.L. Scheffey, J.T. Wong, R. Downs, E. Runnerstrom, F.W. Williams, J.P. Farley, P.A. Tatem, A. Durkin, X. Nguyen, and J. Buchanan, “FY 2001 DC-ARM Final Demonstration Report,” NRL/MR/6180—02-8623, May 31, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose-Pehrsson, S.L., Hart, S.J., Street, T.T. et al. Early Warning Fire Detection System Using a Probabilistic Neural Network. Fire Technology 39, 147–171 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024260130050

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024260130050

Navigation