Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 1. Metal precipitation for recovery and recycle

  • Published:
Biodegradation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acid mine drainage (AMD), an acidic metal-bearingwastewater, poses a severe pollution problem attributedto post mining activities. The metals usuallyencountered in AMD and considered of concern for riskassessment are arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, manganese,zinc, copper and sulfate. The pollution generated byabandoned mining activities in the area of Butte, Montanahas resulted in the designation of the Silver Bow Creek–ButteArea as the largest Superfund (National Priorities List) sitein the U.S. This paper reports the results of bench-scalestudies conducted to develop a resource recovery basedremediation process for the clean up of the Berkeley Pit.The process utilizes selective, sequential precipitation (SSP)of metals as hydroxides and sulfides, such as copper, zinc,aluminum, iron and manganese, from the Berkeley Pit AMDfor their removal from the water in a form suitable foradditional processing into marketable precipitates and pigments.The metal biorecovery and recycle process is based on completeseparation of the biological sulfate reduction step and themetal precipitation step. Hydrogen sulfide produced in the SRBbioreactor systems is used in the precipitation step to forminsoluble metal sulfides. The average metal recoveries usingthe SSP process were as follows: aluminum (as hydroxide) 99.8%,cadmium (as sulfide) 99.7%, cobalt (as sulfide) 99.1% copper(as sulfide) 99.8%, ferrous iron (sulfide) 97.1%, manganese(as sulfide) 87.4%, nickel (as sulfide) 47.8%, and zinc (as sulfide)100%. The average precipitate purity for metals, copper sulfide,ferric hydroxide, zinc sulfide, aluminum hydroxide and manganesesulfide were: 92.4, 81.5, 97.8, 95.6 , 92.1 and 75.0%, respectively.The final produced water contained only calcium and magnesiumand both sulfate and sulfide concentrations were below usablewater limits. Water quality of this agriculturally usable watermet the EPA's gold standard criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen J, Govind R, Tabak HH, Scharp R & Bishop D (1999) Metal recovery and reuse from acid mine drainage. 1999 AIChE Annual Meeting, Technical Program

  • Battaglia-Brunet F, Foucher S, Ignatiadis, I & Morin D (2000) Production of hydrogen sulfide by sulfate reducing bacteria in a two-column gas liquid reactor for the purification of metalcontaining effluents. XXI IMPC. Roma 23–27 July 2000, pp B12–9/17

  • Bhattacharya D, Junawan AB & Grieves RB (1979) Separation of toxic heavy metals by sulfide precipitation. Separat. Sci. Technol. 14(5): 441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya D, Junawan AB, Sun G, Sund-Hagelberg C & Schwitzgebel K (1981) Precipitation of heavy metals with sodium sulfide: Bench-scale and full-scale experimental results AIChE Sympos. Ser. 77(209): 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisman CN, Geraats BG, Uspert P & Letinga G (1989) Optimization of sulfur production in a trickling sulfide removing reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35: 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisman CN, Uspeert O, Hol A, Janssen AJH, ten Hagen R & Letinga B (1991) Kinetic parameters of amixed culture oxidizing sulfide and sulfur with oxygen. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35: 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen B-Y, Utgikar, VP, Harmon SM, Tabak HH, Bishop DF & Govind R (2000) Studies on biosorption of zinc(II) and copper (II) on Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Internat. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 46: 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen B, Laake M & Lien T (1996) Treatment of acid mine water by sulfate reducing bacteria: Results from a bench scale experiment. Wat. Res. 30: 1617–1624

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vegt AL, Bayer CJ & Buisman CJ (1997) Biological sulfate removal and metal recovery from mine waters (pp 93–97). SME Annual Meeting, Denver, CO

  • De Vegt AL, Dukman H & Buisman CJ (1998) Hydrogen sulfide produced from sulfate by biological reduction for use in metallurgical operations. In: Asteljold JA & Stephens RL (Eds) Sulfide smelting '98 current and future practice (pp 16–19). TMS Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, TMS, Warrendale, PA

  • Dispande VP, Pande SP, Gadhari SK & Saxera KL (1991) Acid mine treatment. J Environ. Sci. and Health Part A 8: 1387–1408

    Google Scholar 

  • DuPreez LA, Odendaal JP, Maree JP & Pansonby M (1992) Biological removal of sulfate from industrial effluents using producer gas as energy source. Environ. Technol. 13: 875–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak DH, Hedin RS, Edenborn HM & McIntire PE (1992) Treatment of metal contaminated water using bacterial sulfate reduction: Results from pilot scale reactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 40: 609–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher S, Battaglia-Brunet F, Ignatiadis I & Morin D (2001) Treatment by sulfate-reducing bacteria of Chessy acid mine drainage and metals recovery, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56: 1639–1645

    Google Scholar 

  • Govind R, Kumar U, Puligadda R, Antia J & Tabak HH (1997) Biorecovery of metals from acid mine drainage. Emerg. Technol. Hazard. Waste Management 7: 91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Govind R, Allen J, Fang J, Bishop DF & Tabak HH (1999) Technical Support for studies on confirmation and precipitate purity in the EPA's metal recovery process for the Berkeley Pit acid mine water U.S. EPA Report, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, ORD, Cincinnati, OH, 83 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Govind R, Allen J, Scharp R & Tabak HH (2001) Berkeley Pit, ferrous metals recovery I. Precipitation process. U.S. EPA Report, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, ORD, Cincinnati, OH, 90 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyure RA, Konopa A, Brooks A & Doemel W (1992) Microbial sulfate reduction in acidic strip mine lakes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 73: 193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammack RW, Dworak, DH & Edenborn HM (1993) The use of biogenic hydrogen sulfide to selectively recover copper and zinc from severly contaminated mine waters. In: Torma AE, Wey JE & Lakshman VL (Eds) Biohydrometalurgical Technologies (pp 631–639). The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Warrendale, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera L, Hernandes J, Bravo L & Vara L (1997) Biological process for sulfate and metals abatement from mine effluents. Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 12: 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulshoff Pol L, Lens P, Stams AJM & Lettinga G (1998) Anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters. Biodegradation 9: 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SD, Kilbane JJ & Cha CK (1999) Prevention of acid mine drainage by sulfate reducing bacteria: Organic substrate addition to mine waste piles. Environ. Eng. Sci. 16: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Lens PNL, Lema OF & Holshoff Pol LW (2000) Biological treatment of sulfate rich wastewaters. In: Lens PNL & Hulshoff Pol LW (eds) Environmental technologies to treat sulfur pollution – principles and engineering (pp 153–173). International Water Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C & Peck HD (1981) Comparative bioenergetics of sulfate reduction by Desulfovibrio and Desulfomaculum sp. J. Bacteriol. 145: 966–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree JP & Strydom WF (1983) Biological sulfate removal from industrial effluent in an upflow packed bed reactor. Wat. Res. 21(2): 141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Maree, JP, Gerber, A & Hill H (1987) An integrated process for biological treatment of sulfate containing industrial effluents. J. Pollut. Cont. Feder. 59(12): 1069–1074

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson SR, Colberg PJS & Drever JI (1997) Toxicity of heavy metals (Ni, Zn) to Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Geomicrobiol. J. 14: 41–--

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar VP, Chen B-Y, Tabak HH, Bishop DF & Govind R (2000) Treatment of acid mine drainage: I. Equilibrium biosorption of zinc and copper on non-viable sludge. Internat. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 46: 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar VP, Chen B-Y, Chaudhary M, Tabak HH, Haines JR & Govind R (2001) Acute toxicity of heavy metals to acetate utilizing mixed cultures of sulfate reducing bacteria: EC 100 and EC 50 values. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20 (12): 2662–2669

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar VP, Harmon SM, Chaudhary N, Tabak HH, Govind R & Haines JR (2002) Inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria by sulf-ide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage. Environ. Toxicol. 17: 40–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar VP, Tabak HH, Haines JR & Govind R (2003) Quantification of the toxic and inhibitory impact of heavy metals on mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 82(3): 306–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten RT, Hulshoff PL & Lettinga G (1994) Biological sulfate reduction using gas-lift reactors fed with hydrogen and carbon dioxide as an energy and carbon source. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44: 586–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Houten RT, van der Spoel H, van Aelst AC, Hulshoff PL & Lettinga G. (1996) Biological sulfate reduction using synthesis gas. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 50: 136–144

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, NRMRL, Cincinnati, OH, 45268, USA

    Henry H. Tabak, Richard Scharp, John Burckle & Fred K. Kawahara

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA

    Rakesh Govind

Authors
  1. Henry H. Tabak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Scharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Burckle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fred K. Kawahara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rakesh Govind
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabak, H.H., Scharp, R., Burckle, J. et al. Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 1. Metal precipitation for recovery and recycle. Biodegradation 14, 423–436 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332902740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027332902740

Search

Navigation