Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new preference structure that includes a simple relative measure of strength of preference is developed and integrated into some of the stability definitions for the graph model for conflict resolution. In this triplet preference structure, a decision-maker may greatly prefer or prefer one state or scenario to another, or may be indifferent between them. Four stability definitions (solution concepts), Nash stability (R), general metarationality (GMR), symmetric metarationality (SMR), and sequential stability (SEQ), are extended to include strong and weak stabilities for the case of conflicts with two decision makers. Theorems that clarify the interrelationships of the strong and weak versions of these solution concepts are presented. The application of this new preference structure and the associated solution concepts is demonstrated in an environmental conflict model, called the Sustainable Development Conflict. This case shows that valuable strategic insights are gained when strength of preference is integrated into the stability analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, and D. M. Kilgour. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution.Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, D. M. Kilgour, and X. Peng. (2003a). “A Decision Support System for Interactive Decision Making, Part 1: Model Formulation,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, SMC-33(1), pp. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, D. M. Kilgour, and X. Peng. (2003b). “A Decision Support System for Interactive Decision Making, Part 2: Analysis and Output Interpretation”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, SMC-33(1), pp. 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. M. and K. W. Hipel. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions.New York: NorthHolland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. W. (2001). “Conflict Resolution,” in M. K. Tolba (eds.), Our Fragile World: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development (Forerunner to the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems),Vol. 1, Oxford, United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers, pp. 935–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1999). “Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other Than War,” DoD C4ISR Cooperation Research Program, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M. (1995). “Book Review: Theory of Moves”, Group Decision and Negotiation 4, 283–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1950). “Equilibrium points in n-person games,” Proc. Nat. Academy Sci., New York, NY 36, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1951). “Non-cooperative Games,” Ann. Math. 54, 286–298

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J. and O. Morgenstern. (1944, 1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 1st Ed. 1994, 3rd Ed. 1953, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

    Luai Hamouda

  2. Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5, Canada

    D. Marc Kilgour

  3. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

    Keith W. Hipel

Authors
  1. Luai Hamouda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Marc Kilgour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keith W. Hipel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Marc Kilgour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamouda, L., Kilgour, D.M. & Hipel, K.W. Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Group Decision and Negotiation 13, 449–462 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045751.21207.35

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045751.21207.35

Search

Navigation