Skip to main content
Article for the Special Section

Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Change and Survival

An Investigation of the Association Between Change in Memory Scores and Death

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000047

Joint longitudinal-survival models are useful when repeated measures and event time data are available and possibly associated. The application of this joint model in aging research is relatively rare, albeit particularly useful, when there is the potential for nonrandom dropout. In this article we illustrate the method and discuss some issues that may arise when fitting joint models of this type. Using prose recall scores from the Swedish OCTO-Twin Longitudinal Study of Aging, we fitted a joint longitudinal-survival model to investigate the association between risk of mortality and individual differences in rates of change in memory. A model describing change in memory scores as following an accelerating decline trajectory and a Weibull survival model was identified as the best fitting. This model adjusted for random effects representing individual variation in initial memory performance and change in rate of decline as linking terms between the longitudinal and survival models. Memory performance and change in rate of memory decline were significant predictors of proximity to death. Joint longitudinal-survival models permit researchers to gain a better understanding of the association between change functions and risk of particular events, such as disease diagnosis or death. Careful consideration of computational issues may be required because of the complexities of joint modeling methodologies.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brooks, S., Gelman, A. (1997). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Celeux, G., Forbes, F., Robert, C. T. M. (2006). Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 651–674. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Follman, D., Wu, M. (1995). An approximate generalized linear mixed model with random effects for informative missing data. Biometrics, 51, 151–168. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ghisletta, P. (2008). Application of a joint multivariate longitudinal-survival analysis to examine the terminal decline hypothesis in the Swiss Interdisciplinary Longitudinal Study on the Oldest Old. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63, 185–192. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ghisletta, P., McArdle, J., Linderberg, J. (2006). Longitudinal cognition-survival relations in old and very old age: 13-year data from the Berlin Aging Study. European Psychologist, 11, 204–223. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Guo, X., Carlin, B. (2004). Separate and joint modeling of longitudinal and event time data using standard computer packages. The American Statistician, 58, 16–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hall, C. B., Lipton, R. B., Sliwinski, M., Stewart, W. F. (2000). A change point model for estimating the onset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Statistics in Medicine, 19, 1555–1566. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henderson, R., Diggle, P., Dobson, A. (2000). Joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. Biostatistics, 1, 465–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, B., Berg, S. (1989). The robustness of the terminal decline phenomenon: Longitudinal data from the Digit-Span Memory Test. Journals of Gerontology, 44, 184–186. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, B., Zarit, S. H. (1997). Early cognitive markers of the incidence of dementia and mortality: A longitudinal population-based study of the oldest old. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 53–59. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lavery, L. L., Dodge, H. H., Snitz, B., Ganguli, M. (2009). Cognitive decline and mortality in a community-based cohort: The Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57, 94–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, H., Turnbull, B. W., McCulloch, C. E., Slate, E. H. (2002). Latent class models for joint longitudinal biomarker and event process data: Application to longitudinal prostate-specific antigen readings and prostate cancer. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 53–65. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, R., Rubin, D. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lunn, D., Thomas, A., Best, N., Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). WinBUGS – a Bayesian modeling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325–337. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McArdle, J., Small, B., Backman, L., Fratiglioni, L. (2005). Longitudinal models of growth and survival applied to the early detection of Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 18, 234–241. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McClearn, G. E., Johansson, B., Berg, S., Pedersen, N. L., Ahern, F., Petrill, S. A., Plomin, R. (1997). Substantial genetic influence on cognitive abilities in twins 80 or more years old. Science, 276, 1560–1563. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2007). Aging and the elapse of time: A comment on the analysis of change. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62, S198–S202. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neuhaus, A., Heuman, D. (2006). A review on joint models in biometrical research. Institute of Statistics, University of Munich, Discussion Paper 506. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oksuzyan, A., Crimmins, E., Saito, Y., O’Rand, A., Vaupel, J. W., Christensen, K. (2010). Cross-national comparison of sex differences in health and mortality in Denmark, Japan and the US. European Journal of Epidemiology, 25, 471–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Philipson, P., Ruwanthi, K.-D., Sousa, I., Diggle, P., Henderson, R., Williamson, P., Green, G. (2011). Joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data in clinical research [Computer software]. R software package, UseR! conference 2010. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rizopoulos, D. (2010). JM: An R package for the joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data [Computer software]. Journal of Statistical Software, 35 9, 1–33. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spiegelhalter, D., Best, N., Carlin, B., vander Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 4, 583–639. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsiatsis, A., Davidian, M. (2004). Joint modeling of longitudinal and time-to-event data: An overview. Statistica Sinica, 14, 809–834. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Y., Taylor, J. (2001). Joint modeling longitudinal and event time data with application to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 895–905. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar