Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.50.2.61

Zusammenfassung. Vor dem Hintergrund des organisationalen Wandels und veränderter Anforderungen an Führungskräfte werden in der Führungsforschung seit Mitte der 80er Jahre verstärkt Ansätze der charismatischen beziehungsweise transformationalen Führung diskutiert und untersucht. Die meisten empirischen Befunde hierzu basieren auf Erhebungen, bei denen unterschiedliche Versionen des Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) eingesetzt wurden. In diesem Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse von Validierungsuntersuchungen zu einer deutschen, adaptierten Fassung der aktuellen Version 5 x Short des MLQ (Bass & Avolio, 1995) berichtet. Überprüft wurden die psychometrischen Qualitäten sowie Fragen der Validität auf der Grundlage unterschiedlicher betrieblicher Stichproben mit über N = 3500 Befragten. Die gefundene Faktorenstruktur lässt sich im Rahmen des Gesamtmodells interpretieren, wobei die Anzahl der Faktoren etwas von der theoretisch postulierten Vorgabe abweicht. Insgesamt zeigt sich eine gute Konstruktvalidität. Weiterführend wird der Frage nachgegangen, inwieweit sich deutsche und nordamerikanische Stichproben bei der Einschätzung ihrer Führungskräfte mit dem MLQ unterscheiden. Abschließend werden Ansatzpunkte für Modifikationen und Verbesserungen angegeben, die bei einer Weiterentwicklung des Instruments berücksichtigt werden sollten.


Validation of a German version of the “Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire” (MLQ Form 5 x Short) by Bass and Avolio (1995)

Abstract. Increasing organizational change and new demands in the field of leadership have evoked a growing interest in the concepts of charismatic and transformational leadership. Probably the most frequently used questionnaire to measure transformational leadership is the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). In this article the validation of an adapted and modified German version of the current MLQ 5 x Short (Bass & Avolio, 1995) is presented. Psychometric properties are tested and questions concerning the validity of the instrument are discussed. Results are based on a number of different samples with more than 3 500 participants. While the postulated dimensionality is only partly supported, there is evidence for good validity with regard to external criteria. Furthermore, differences between German and American findings are discussed. Finally, recommendations for further developments and improvements of the instrument are provided.

Literatur

  • Alimo-Metcalfe, B. , Alban-Metcalfe, R. J. (2001). The development of a new transformational leadership questionnaire. British Psychological Society, 74 , 1–27. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allen, N. J. , Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63 , 1–18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andriessen, E. J. H. , Drenth, P. J. D. (1997). Leadership: Theories and models. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry & C. W. de Wolf (Eds.), Handbook of organizational psychology (pp.321-355). Hove: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Antonakis, J. , Avolio, B. J. , Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ Form 5x). Leadership Quarterly, 14 , 261–295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J. , Bass, B. M. , Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72 , 441–462. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Awamleh, R. , Gardner, W. L. (1999). Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10 , 345–373. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. Leadership Quarterly, 6 , 463–478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership. Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: LEA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8 , 9–32. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions (pp.49-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. (1995). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bass, B. M. , Avolio, B. J. , Jung, D. I. , Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 , 207–218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. , Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88 , 588–606. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bycio, P. , Hackett, D. H. , Allen, J. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conzeptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 , 468–478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carless, S. A. (1998). Short research note: Assessing the discriminant validity of transformational leader behaviour as measured by the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71 , 353–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conger, J. A. , Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership. The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Deluga, R. J. (1995). The relationship between attributional charismatic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 25 , 1652–1669. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Den Hartog, D. N. , Van Muijen, J. J. , Koopman, P. L. (1997). Transactional versus transformational leadership: An analysis of the MLQ. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70 , 19–34. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. (2005). Charisma, transformationale Führung und Commitment. Köln: Kölner Studien Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Goihl, K. (2002). Transformational leadership and commitment. In J. Felfe (Ed.), Organizational development and leadership (pp.87-124). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Liepmann, D. (1997). Skalendokumentation zum Instrument zur Mitarbeiterbefragung. Unveröffentlichter Bericht, Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Schyns, B. (2002). The relationship between employees' occupational self-efficacy and perceived transformational leadership - replication and extension of recent results. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7 , 137–162. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Schyns, B. (2004). Is similarity in leadership related to organizational outcomes? The case of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10 , 92–102. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Six, B. (2006). Die Relation von Arbeitszufriedenheit und Commitment. In L. Fischer (Hrsg.), Arbeitszufriedenheit (S. 37-60). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Six, B. , Schmook, R. (2002). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von affektivem, kalkulatorischem und normativem Commitment gegenüber der Organisation, dem Beruf/der Tätigkeit und der Beschäftigungsform (COBB). In A. Glöckner-Rist (Hrsg.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente. Version 7.00. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Six, B. , Schmook, R. (2005). Die Bedeutung der Arbeitszufriedenheit für Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB). Wirtschaftspsychologie, 7 (1) , 49–62. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Felfe, J. , Tartler, K. , Liepmann, D. (2004). Advanced research in the field of transformational leadership. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 18 , 262–288. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fuller, J. B. , Patterson, C. E. P. , Hester, K. , Stringer, D. Y. (1996). A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership. Psychological Reports, 78 , 271–287. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gerstner, C. R. , Day, D. V. (1994). Cross-cultural comparison of leadership prototypes. Leadership-Quarterly, 5 , 121–134. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geyer, A. , Steyrer, J. (1994). Transformationale Führung, klassische Führungstheorien und Erfolgsindikatoren von Bankbetrieben. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 64 , 961–979. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwin, V. L. , Wofford, J. C. , Whittington, J. L. (2001). A theoretical and empirical extension to the transformational leadership construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 , 759–774. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hater, J. J. , Bass, B. M. (1988). Supervisors' evaluations and subordinates' perception of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 , 695–702. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp.189-207). Oxford: Southern Illinois University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Howell, J. M. , Frost, P. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43 , 243–269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hunt, J. G. , Conger, J. A. (1999). From where we sit: An assessment of transformational and charismatic leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 10 , 335–343. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirkpatrick, S. A. , Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 , 36–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kramer, W. (2001). Referenzwerte zum MLQ 5x Short. Verfügbar unter: cls.binghamton.edu/mlq.htm [19.12.2005]. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuchinke, K. P. (1999). Leadership and culture: Work-related values and leadership styles among one company's U.S. and German telecommunication employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10 , 135–154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lowe, K. B. , Kroeck, K. G. , Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7 , 265–284. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKenzie, S. B. , Podsakoff, P. M. , Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29 , 115–134. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, J. P. , Stanley, D. J. , Herscovitch, L. , Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61 , 20–52. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. , Paine, J. B. (1999). A new kind of performance for industrial and organizational psychology: Recent contributions to the study of organizational citizenship behavior. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.337-368). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , Ahearne, M. , MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 , 262–270. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22 , 259–298. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. , Moorman, R. H. , Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1 , 107–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pundt, A. , Schyns, B. (2005). Führung im Ideenmanagement. Der Zusammenhang zwischen transformationaler Führung und dem individuellen Engagement im Ideenmanagement. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 4 , 55–65. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schreyögg, G. , Noss, C. (1995). Organisatorischer Wandel. Von der Organisationsentwicklung zur lernenden Organisation. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 55 , 169–185. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Seltzer, J. , Numerof, R. E. , Bass, B. M. (1989). Transformational leadership: Is it a source of more burnout and stress?. Journal of Health and Human Resource Administration, 12 , 174–185. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shea, C. M. , Howell, J. M. (1999). Charismatic leadership and task feedback: A laboratory study of their effects on self-efficacy and task performance. Leadership Quarterly, 10 , 375–396. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Six, B. , Felfe, J. , Schmook, R. , Knorz, C. (2001). Commitment in neuen Arbeitsformen. Unveröffentlichter Bericht, Universität Halle. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tartler, K. , Goihl, K. , Kroeger, M. , Felfe, J. (2003). Selbst- vs. Fremdbewertung - Bedeutung für die Führungspraxis. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 2 , 13–21. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Tejeda, M. J. , Scandura, T. A. , Pillai, R. (2001). The MLQ revisited: Psychometric properties and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 12 , 31–52. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tichy, N. M. , Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberghe, C. , Stordeur, S. , D'hoore, W. (2002). Transactional and transformational leadership in nursing: Structural validity and substantive relationships. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18 , 16–29. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weakness in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10 , 285–305. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar