Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000070

Soziale Berufe (sensu KldB 92, Vh 86; Statistisches Bundesamt, 1992, S. 51) bilden ein wesentliches Segment des Arbeitsmarktes in Deutschland. Gleichwohl liegen bisher keine Befunde dazu vor, wie Intelligenz und Persönlichkeitsmerkmale mit Leistungsbeurteilungen und Einkommen in diesem Bereich zusammenhängen. Dies wurde in der vorliegenden Studie bei 142 erwerbstätigen Personen aus sozialen Berufen untersucht. Die Leistung wurde auf den Dimensionen aufgabenbezogene Leistung, Arbeitseinsatz und Sozialverhalten durch Vorgesetzte oder Kollegen beurteilt. Kontrolliert wurden Alter, Geschlecht und Bildung. Die Allgemeine Intelligenz stand in Beziehung zum Einkommen, nicht aber zur aufgabenbezogenen Leistung. Gewissenhaftigkeit stand in Beziehung zur aufgabenbezogenen Leistung und zum Arbeitseinsatz. Das Sozialverhalten sowie der Arbeitseinsatz standen in Beziehung zum Persönlichkeitsmerkmal Verträglichkeit. Diese Befunde liefern Hinweise darauf, dass Persönlichkeitstests bei der Personalauswahl auch in diesem Berufsbereich nutzbringend eingesetzt werden können. Für Intelligenztests konnte dies nicht nachgewiesen werden. Weitere theoretische und praktische Implikationen der Befunde sowie Stärken und Grenzen der Studie werden diskutiert.


Intelligence, personality, income, and job performance assessments by others in social welfare jobs: A validation study

Social welfare jobs form an important segment of the German labour market. However, there are yet no empirical data on how intelligence and personality relate to job performance and income in this labour market segment. 142 social welfare workers participated in this study. Job performance was assessed on three dimensions by supervisors or peers: task performance, job dedication, and interpersonal facilitation. We controlled for age, gender, and educational level. General Intelligence associated with income but not with task performance. Conscientiousness associated with task performance and job dedication. Agreeableness associated with interpersonal facilitation. These results indicate that contrary to intelligence tests personality tests can improve personnel decision making in this job segment. Additional theoretical and practical implications and strengths and limitations are discussed.

Literatur

  • Allmendinger, J. , Ebner, C. (2006). Arbeitsmarkt und demografischer Wandel. Die Zukunft der Beschäftigung in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 50, 227-239. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Amthor, R. C. (2003). Die Geschichte der Berufsbildung in der Sozialen Arbeit. Auf der Suche nach Professionalisierung und Identität. Weinheim: Juventa. Google Scholar

  • Baron, R. M. , Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R. , Mount, M. K. , Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and job performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bergmann, C. , Eder, F. (1992). Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test. Umwelt-Stuktur-Test. Manual. Weinheim: Beltz. Google Scholar

  • Berry, C. M. , Gruys, M. L. , Sackett, P. R. (2006). Educational attainment as a proxy for cognitive ability in selection: Effects of levels of cognitive ability and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 696-705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , v. Below, A. , Johannen, A. (2011). Self-ratings of political skill in job applicants: A within- and between-subjects field experiment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 98-104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Kramer, J. , Schneider, P. B. , Meurs, J. A. , Ferris, G. R. , Mierke, J. , Witzki, A. H. , Momm, T. D. (2011). Role of political skill in job performance prediction beyond General Mental Ability and personality in cross-sectional and predictive studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 239-265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Momm, T. , Schneider, P. B. , Gansen, D. , Kramer, J. (2009). Does acquisitive self-presentation in personality self-ratings enhance validity? Evidence from two experimental field studies. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 142-153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Schnitzler, A. (2010). Is the political skill inventory fit for personnel selection? An experimental field study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 155-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Wendel, S. , Ferris, G. R. (2010). Political skill as moderator of personality - job performance relationships in Socioanalytic Theory: Test of the getting ahead motive in automobile sales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 326-335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Witzki, A. (2008). New psychological contracts in the world of work, economic citizens or victims of the market? - The German case. Society and Business Review, 3, 149-161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blickle, G. , Witzki, A. , Schneider, P. B. (2009). Self-initiated mentoring and career success: A predictive field study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 94-101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Google Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowen, C. , Swim, J. K. , Jacobs, R. R. (2000). Evaluating gender biases on actual job performance of real people: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 648-665. Google Scholar

  • Breaugh, J.A. (2008). Important considerations in using statistical procedures to control for nuisance variables in non-experimental studies. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 282-293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. , Ziegler, M. (2009). Statistik für Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler. München: Pearson. Google Scholar

  • Ellingson, J. E. , Sackett, P. R. , Connelly, B. S. (2007). Personality assessment across selection and development contexts: Insights into response distortion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 386-395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferris, G. R. , Witt, L. A. , Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1075-1082. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, J. , Barrett, P. , Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1270-1285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices. A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar

  • Hunter, J. E. , Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2. Auflage). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • International Labour Office (Hrsg.). (1990). International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-88. Geneva: International Labour Office. Google Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Cable, D. M. , Boudreau, J. W. , Bretz, R. D. (1995). An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 485-519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A. , Higgins, C. A. , Thoresen, C. J. , Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five Personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology, 52, 620-652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kramer, J. (2009). Allgemeine Intelligenz und beruflicher Erfolg in Deutschland: Vertiefende und weiterführende Metaanalysen. Psychologische Rundschau, 60, 82-98. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kuncel, R. R. , Hezlett, S. A. , Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148-161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marcus, B. (2003). Personality testing in personnel selection: Is “socially desirable” responding really undesirable? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 138-148. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • Marcus, B. , Schuler, H. , Quell, P. , Hümpfer, G. (2002). Measuring counter productivity: Development and initial validation of a German self-report questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mount, M. K. , Barrick, M. R. , Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-Factor Model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Relations, 2, 183-200. Google Scholar

  • Nerdinger, F. , Blickle, G. , Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Auflage). Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ng, T. W. H. , Eby, L. T. , Sorensen, K. L. , Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J.C. , Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3. Auflage). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar

  • Oh, I.-S. , Wang, G. , Mount, M. K. (in press). Validity of observer ratings of the Five-Factor model of personality traits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. Google Scholar

  • Ones, D. S, , Dilchert S., Viswesvaran C. , Judge, T. A. (2007). In support of personality assessment in organizational settings. Personnel Psychology, 60, 995-1027. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Organ, D. W. , Podsakoff, P. M. , MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior. Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar

  • Prenzel, M. (1988). Die Wirkungsweise von Interessen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 124, 262-274. Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. (2004). General Mental Ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162-173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. , Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432-439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, N. , Cortina, J. M. , Ingerick, M. J. & Wiechmann, D. (2003). Personnel selection and employee performance. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen , R. J. Klimoski, (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 77-105). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (1992). Klassifizierung der Berufe, systematisches und alphabetisches Verzeichnis der Berufsbenennungen. Stuttgart: Metzler & Poeschel. Google Scholar

  • Turban, D. B. , Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 688-702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Scotter, J. R. , Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Witzki, A. H. (2008). Intelligenz und Mentoring. Studie zum Zusammenhang von Intelligenz und Mentoring und deren Einfluss auf beruflichen Erfolg. Dissertation. Bonn: Universität Bonn. Google Scholar

  • Wonderlic, Inc. (1996). Wonderlic Personal Test (WPT - German Version). Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic Personnel Test, Inc. Google Scholar

  • Wonderlic Inc. (2002). Wonderlic Personnel Test & Scholastic Level Exam: User’s manual. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic. Google Scholar