Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000114

Frauen sind selten in Führungspositionen vertreten. Eine Erklärung dafür könnte in Rollenkonflikten liegen, die aus den vorherrschenden Stereotypen über Frauen und über Führungskräfte entstehen. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht Veränderungen der Stereotype über weibliche und über männliche Führungskräfte in einem Zeitraum von 36 Jahren. Dazu wurde eine Inhaltsanalyse von Todesanzeigen aus vier deutschsprachigen Zeitungen durchgeführt. Es zeigte sich, dass über die Zeit vor allem die Beschreibung der weiblichen Führungskräfte variiert, während die Darstellung verstorbener Männer in Führungspositionen vergleichsweise stabil ist. Eine tendenzielle Annährung der Geschlechterstereotype scheint aber stattzufinden. Den Führungsstil betreffend konnten keine statistisch bedeutsamen Geschlechtsunterschiede hinsichtlich Aufgabenorientierung und lediglich 2004 ein signifikanter Geschlechtsunterschied in der Zuschreibung von Personenorientierung der verstorbenen Führungskräfte festgestellt werden. Männliche Führungskräfte wurden aber zu den sehr frühen als auch zu den sehr späten Beobachtungszeitpunkten häufiger mit erfolgskorrelierten und stabilen Eigenschaften beschrieben als Frauen.


Gender stereotypes and leadership between 1974 and 2010. An analysis of obituaries of deceased female and male managers

Females are still underrepresented in leadership positions. This fact might be explained by a conflict of roles due to prevalent stereotypes about women and about leaders. The present study investigates changes in the stereotypes of female and male leaders over a period of 36 years. A content analysis of obituaries published in four Austrian, German, and Swiss newspapers showed that the attributes used to describe deceased female leaders have changed over time. Although the descriptions of deceased male leaders have remained comparatively stable, female and male stereotypes seem to be converging. Regarding descriptions of leadership style, no significant gender differences were observed concerning task-orientation. Attributions of person-orientation were only found to differ significantly between males and females in 2004. However, males were more often described using attributes that seem to be correlated with leadership success and which in general are considered as stable traits.

Literatur

  • Ahmad, S. , Hudelist, S. , Wieser, C. (2012). Frauen.Management.Report.2012. Frauen in Geschäftsführung und Aufsichtsrat in den Top 200 börsennotierten Unternehmen. Abteilung Betriebswirtschaft, Arbeiterkammer Wien, Österreich (Zugriff am 14. 11. 2012 http://wien.arbeiterkammer.at/bilder/d167/FrauenManagementReport_2012.pdf). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barreto, M. , Ryan, M. , Schmitt, M. (Eds.). (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers do gender equality. London: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blake, R. , Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The key to leadership excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Blasius, J. (2001). Korrespondenzanalyse. München: Oldenbourg Verlag. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosak, J. , Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender bias in leader selection? Evidence from a hiring simulation study. Sex Roles, 65, 234 – 242. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Curşeu, P. L. , Boroş, S. (2011). Gender stereotypes in management: A comparative study of communist and postcommunist Romania. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 299 – 309. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories. Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105 – 116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deaux, K. , Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 80 – 85. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diekman, A. B. , Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171 – 1188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807 – 834. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233 – 256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573 – 598. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. , Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21 – 49). London: Amercian Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Europäische Kommission (2007). Frauen und Männer in Entscheidungspositionen 2007. Retrieved October 17, 2011, from: http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=2034&langId=de. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Garcia-Retamero, R. , Müller, S. M. , López-Zafra, E. (2011). The malleability of gender stereotypes: Influence of population size on perceptions of men and women in the past, present, and future. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 635 – 656. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Green, R. J. , Ashmore, R. D. (1998). Taking and developing pictures in the head: Assessing the physical stereotypes of eight gender types. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1609 – 1636. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hannover, B. , Kessels, U. (2003). Erklärungsmuster weiblicher und männlicher Spitzen-Manager zur Unterrepräsentanz von Frauen in Führungspositionen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 197 – 204. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Heilman, M. E. , Haynes, M. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 905 – 916. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holub, S. C. , Tisak, M. S. , Mullins, D. (2008). Gender differences in children’s hero attributions: Personal hero choices and evaluations of typical male and female heroes. Sex Role, 58, 567 – 578. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D. , Engstrom, E. , Emmers-Sommer, T. (2007). Think leader, think male and female: Sex vs. setting arrangement as leadership cues. Sex Roles, 57, 713 – 723. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johanson, J. C. (2008). Perceptions of femininity in leadership: Modern trend or classic component? Sex Roles, 58, 784 – 789. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kirchler, E. (1992). Adorable woman, expert man: Changing gender images of women and men in management. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 363 – 373. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landis, J. R. , Koch, G. C. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159 – 174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Latu, I. M. , Stewart, T. L. , Myers, A. C. , Lisco, C. G. , Estes, S. B. , Donahue, D. K. (2011). What we „say” and what we „think” about female managers: Explicit versus implicit associations of women with success. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 252 – 266. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muehlbacher, S. , Hofmann, E. , Kirchler, E. , Roland-Levy, C. (2009). Household decision making: Changes of female and male partners’ roles? Journal of Psychology & Economics, 2(2), 17 – 37. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Porter, N. , Lindauer Geis, F. , Jennings, J. (1983). Are women invisible as leaders? Sex Roles, 9, 1035 – 1049. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quaquebeke, N. v. , Schmerling, A. (2010). Kognitive Gleichstellung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 54, 91 – 104. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rodler, C. , Kirchler, E. , Hölzl, E. (2001). Gender stereotypes of leader: An analysis of the contents of obituaries from 1974 to 1998. Sex Roles, 45, 827 – 843. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rohmann, A. , Rowold, J. (2009). Gender and leadership style. A field study in different organizational contexts in Germany. Equal Opportunities International, 28, 545 – 558. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosette, A. S. , Tost, L. P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 221 – 235. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ryan, M. K. , Haslam, S. A. , Hersby, M. D. , Bongiorno, R. (2010). Think crisis-think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470 – 484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sanchez, P. , Hucles, P. , Sanchez-Hucles, J. , Mehta, S. M. (2007). Increasing diverse women leadership in corporate America: Climbing concrete walls and shattering glass ceilings! In J. L. Chin, B. Lott, J. K. Rice & J. Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.), Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices (pp. 228 – 245). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sanchez-Hucles, J. V. , Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership. American Psychologist, 65, 171 – 181. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675 – 688. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schyns, B. (2008). Einflussfaktoren auf die Wahrnehmung von Führung. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 182 – 190. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sieverding, M. (2003). Frauen unterschätzen sich: Selbstbeurteilungs-Biases in einer simulierten Bewerbungssituation. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 147 – 160. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar