Dealing with Stress in the Workplace
Compensatory Effects of Belief in a Just World
Abstract
Abstract. In an online questionnaire filled out by 217 employees of various organizations, we investigated the implication of belief in a just world (BJW) for work-related cognitions and behavior (e.g., emotional exhaustion), taking central work stressors (e.g., workload), as well as work stress-related resources (e.g., autonomy), into account. We argued that BJW might compensate for the negative effects of the aforementioned stressors on work-related cognitions and behavior. BJW serves adaptive psychological functions such as the following: (1) It helps the individual to interpret the events in his or her life in a meaningful way and, thus, to deal with unjust experiences. In light of this function, we hypothesized that employees with a strong BJW would experience more organizational commitment and report fewer turnover intentions, and that the influence of BJW in these areas exists over and above the influence of central stressors and work stress-related resources. A further adaptive function of BJW is that it (2) provides the individual with trust in his or her own efficacy, as well as in the social environment. Thus, we assumed that those high in BJW would estimate that they perform better in their job and show less sick presence. As a consequence of these two functions, (3) BJW fosters mental health. With respect to mental health, we expected high believers to report less emotional exhaustion and fewer symptoms of depersonalization. Results of hierarchical regression analyses confirmed our hypotheses. We argue, therefore, that BJW should be seen as a psychological resource compensating for stress in the workplace.
References
1994). Relationship of job stressors to job performance: linear or inverted-u?. Psychological Reports, 75, 547– 558.
(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267- 289). New York: Academic Press.
(1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173– 184.
(1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351– 363.
(1992). Die Messung von Burnout. Untersuchung einer deutschen Fassung des Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-D). [Measuring burnout: A study of a German version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-D)] Diagnostica, 38, 328– 353.
(1997). Coping with an unjust fate: The case of structural unemployment. Social Justice Research, 10, 175– 189.
(1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79– 98.
(2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events . New York: Plenum.
(2005). “Choosing” to work when sick: Workplace presenteeism. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 2273– 2282.
(2002). Mental health and personality of Slovak unemployed adolescents: The impact of belief in a just world. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 732– 757.
(2002). Working on stress . Retrieved February 14, 2007, from agency.osha.eu.int.
(1991). Human values, global self-esteem, and belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 59, 83– 107.
(2006). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von affektivem, kalkulatorischem und normativem Commitment gegenüber der Organization, dem Beruf/der Tätigkeit und der Beschäftigungsform (COBB). [Instrument to assess affective, calculative, and normative commitment toward the organization, the profession, and the kind of employment (COBB)]. In A. Glöckner-Rist (Ed.), ZUMA-Informationssystem. Ein elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente [ZUMA information system: An electronic handbook of social science scales]. ZIS Version 10.00. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
(1995). The just world, charitable giving, and attitudes to disability. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 577– 583.
(Eds. (2005). Handbook of organizational justice . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2000). Zum Einsatz einer revidierten und erweiterten Fassung des Job Diagnostic Survey im Dienstleistungs- und Verwaltungssektor. [Diagnostic use of the Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS) in a revised and extended version for organizations and employees in the service and administration sector] Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organizationspsychologie, 44, 115– 128.
(2005). Justice at work and reduced risk of coronary heart disease among employees: The Whitehall II Study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 2245– 2251.
(2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference?. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 521– 532.
(2000). Job stress and health. In N. Chmiel (Ed.), Work and organizational psychology (pp. 148-177). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
(1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355– 360.
(1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1– 52.
(1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666– 677.
(1993). The belief in a just world and perceptions of discrimination. Journal of Psychology, 127, 465– 474.
(1998). Explaining unfair and fair outcomes: The therapeutic value of attributional analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 495– 511.
(1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99– 113.
(2005). Social comparison, perceived control, and occupational burnout. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 99– 118.
(2006). Posttraumatic symptoms, depression, and anxiety of flood victims: The impact of the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1075– 1084.
(2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 559– 573.
(in press). Mental health, occupational trust, and the quality of working life: Does the belief in a just world matter?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,.
(2002). Job characteristics as predictors of ill-health and sickness absenteeism in different occupational types - A multigroup structural equation modeling approach. Work & Stress, 16, 229– 250.
(in press). Concepts and methods. In K. Isaksson, D. Guest, & H. De Witte (Eds.), Employment contracts, psychological contracts, and worker well-being: A European study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1996). Gender difference in managers' explanations for their work performance: A study in two organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 145– 151.
(2002). Assessing the costs of behavioral and psychological withdrawal: A new model and an empirical illustration. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 67– 90.
(1999). Instrument zur Stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse (ISTA). [Instrument for stress-related job analysis (ISTA)]. In H. Dunckel (Eds.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren [Handbook of psychological job analysis methods] (pp. 179-204). Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag.
(2000). The interactive effect of job involvement and organizational commitment on job turnover revisited: A note on the mediating role of turnover intention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 247– 252.
(1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisals of and subjective, physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 732– 740.
(1999). The Leiden Quality of Work Questionnaire: It's construction, factor structure, and psychometric qualities. Psychological Reports, 85, 954– 962.
(2005). Work stress and attentional difficulties: An initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work & Stress, 19, 23– 36.
(2005). How can justice be used to manage stress in organizations?. In J. Greenberg & J.A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 383-410).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1975). Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 972– 976.
(