Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Research Articles

Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking?

Published Online:September 01, 2006https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165

Abstract

Abstract. One of the main advantages of measures of automatic cognition is supposed to be that they are less susceptible to faking than explicit tests. It is an empirical question, however, to what degree these measures can be faked, and the response might well differ for different measures. We tested whether the Implicit Association Test (IAT, Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998) cannot be faked as easily as explicit measures of the same constructs. We chose the Big-Five dimensions conscientiousness and extraversion as the constructs of interest. The results show, indeed, that the IAT is much less susceptible to faking than questionnaire measures are, even if no selective faking of single dimensions of the questionnaire occurred. However, given limited experience, scores on the IAT, too, are susceptible to faking.

References

  • Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., Mücke, D.(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., Schnabel, K.(2003). Fakability of an Implicit Association Test (IAT) and a new Implicit Association Procedure (IAP) for shyness. Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banaji, M. R.(2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. Roediger, III & J. S. Nairne (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Science conference series (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Banse, R., Seise, J., Zerbes, N.(2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K.(1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1– 26 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, P.(1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511– 530 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, P.(2000). The “Big Two” Seelische Gesundheit und Verhaltenskontrolle: Zwei orthogonale Superfaktoren höherer Ordnung? [The “Big Two” psychological health and behavior test: Two orthogonal super factors of higher order?. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 21, 113– 124 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F.(1993). NEO-FFI. Neo-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar nach Costa und McCrae - deutsche Fassung. [NEO-FFI. Neo-Five-Factor inventory according to Costa and McCrae - German version. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., Jr., Pennebaker, J. W.(2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631– 643 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Bredenkamp, J., Erdfelder, E.(1985). Multivariate Varianzanalyse nach dem V-Kriterium (Multivariate variance analysis with the V criterium]. Psychologische Beiträge, 27, 127– 154 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., Messner, C.(2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760– 773 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Brickenkamp, R.(1981). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test d2. (Test of Attention d2]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B.(1955). Psychiatric screening of flying personnel; personality structure in objective tests: A study of 1,000 air force students in basic pilot training.. (Proj. No. 21-0202-0007. [Rep. No. 9]) USAF School of Aviation Medicine, 50, 50– First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B., Warburton, F. W.(1967). Objective personality and motivation tests: a theoretical introduction and practical compendium. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J.(1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (revised ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dalen, L. H., Stanton, N. A., Roberts, A. D.(2001). Faking personality questionnaires in personnel selection. Journal of Management Development, 20, 729– 742 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egan, V., Deary, I., Austin, E.(2000). The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907– 920 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Egloff, B., Schmukle, S. C.(2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441– 1455 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H., Olson, M. A.(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297– 327 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Fiedler, K., Bluemke, M.(2003). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Test. Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A.(1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 385– 400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A.(1997). Knowing and faking one’s Five-Factor personality score. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 229– 243 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Furnham, A.(2001). Test-taking style, personality traits, and psychometric validity. In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 289-304). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., Schwartz, J. L. K.(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R.(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T.(1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356– 388 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hough, L. M., Eaton, N. K., Dunnette, M. D., Kamp, J. D., McCloy, R. A.(1990). Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 581– 595 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, C. J., Francis, L. J.(1999). Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 59– 63 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kim, D. Y.(2003). Voluntary controllability of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 83– 96 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kühnen, U., Schiessl, M., Bauer, N., Paulig, N., Pöhlmann, C., Schmidthals, K.(2001). How robust is the IAT? Measuring and manipulating implicit attitudes of East- and West-Germans. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 135– 144 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • McConnell, A. R., Leibold, J. M.(2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435– 442 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr(1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. 139-153). New York: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mierke, J., Klauer, K. C.(2004). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180– 1192 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., Strauss, J. P.(1994). Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 272– 280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nederhof, A. J.(1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263– 280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nisbett, R. E., Wilson, T. D.(1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231– 259 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ottaway, S. A., Hayden, D. C., Oakes, M. A.(2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the implicit association test. Social Cognition, 19, 97– 144 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosse, J. G., Stecher, M. D., Miller, J. L., Levin, R. A.(1998). The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 634– 644 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., Glick, P.(2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743– 762 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., Greenwald, A. G., Mellott, D. S., Schwartz, J. L. K(1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 17, 437– 465 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scandell, D. J., Wlazelek, B.(1999). The relationship between self-perceived personality and impression management on the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 147– 154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N., Baldini, C., Rollnik, J., Tress, W.(2001). Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO-FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 713– 722 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwenkmezger, P.(1995). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar [NEO-Big-Five Inevntory]. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (Testrezension) Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 237– 238 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Chan, K. Y., Lee, W. C., Drasgow, F.(2001). Effects of the testing situation on item responding: Cause for concern. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 943– 953 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C.(1999). Mac-IAT [Computer program]. Trier, Germany: University of Trier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C. (in press) Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Buchner, A.(2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50, 33– 48 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Günster, A., Hartmann, J., Mehl, B.(2004). Veränderte Märkte, feminisiertes Management, neue Chancen? Der steinige Weg der Frauen in Führungspositionen [Changed markets, feminized management, new chances? Women’s stoney path to management positions]. In C. Baltes-Löhr, K. Hölz (Eds.), Gender-Perspektiven: interdisziplinär - transversal - aktuell (pp. 113-127). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Peter Lang Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Jelenec, P., Anheuser, J., Goergens, N. K., Lichau, J., Still, Y.(2003). A two-factor model of reaction time differences in the Implicit Association Test. Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Kirschbaum, M., Müller, P.(2004). Avoiding stimulus effects in the Implicit Association Test: The Concept Association Task. Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Lichau, J., Still, Y., Jelenec, P., Anheuser, J., Goergens, N. K., Hülsebusch, T.(2004). Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? Ein Zweifaktorenmodell zur Erklärung der Reaktionszeitunterschiede im Implicit Association Test (IAT) [Individual or group, exemplar or category? A two-factor model for explaining the reaction-time differences in the IAT]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 57– 65 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Plewe, I.(2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 123– 134 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C., Schulze König, S.(2003). Predicting spontaneous behavior with Implicit Association Tests. Manuscript submitted for publication . First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Strack, F.(1994). Response processes in social judgment. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed.) (pp. 287-322). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Teachman, B. A., Gregg, A. P., Woody, S. R.(2001). Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226– 235 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., Park, B.(2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815– 827 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar