Spatial Associations in Number-Related Tasks
A Comparison of Manual and Pedal Responses
Abstract
Bimanual parity judgments of numerically small (large) digits are faster with the left (right) hand (the SNARC effect; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993). According to one explanation, this effect is culturally derived and reflects ontogenetic influences such as the direction of written language; it might therefore be limited to, or at least be larger with, pairs of lateralized effectors which are instrumental to the production and comprehension of written language. We report two experiments which test for SNARC effects with pedal responses, and compare these effects to manual results. Pedal responses yielded highly systematic SNARC effects; furthermore, these effects did not differ from manual SNARC effects. These results argue against accounts in which the SNARC effect is specific for effectors that are habitually associated with the production or comprehension of written language.
References
(1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36, 731– 735
(1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286– 308
(1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition, 83, 223– 240
(1998). Ordering the numerosities 1-9 by monkeys. Science, 282, 746– 749
(1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
(1993). Varieties of numerical cognition. Cognition, 44, 1– 42
(1997). The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371– 396
(2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218– 224
(1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC-Effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95– 110
(2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 415– 423
(2003). Cognitive representation of negative number. Psychological Science, 14, 278– 282
(2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51, 91– 97
(1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computing. Cognition, 44, 43– 74
(2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 59– 65
(2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87– B95
(1998). The universal history of numbers: from prehistory to the invention of the computer. London: Harvill.
(2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662– 673
(2004). Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Accepted for publication in Memory & Cognition .
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop-effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163– 203
(2003). The SNARC effect: an instant of the Simon effect?. Cognition, 88, B1– B10
(1995). The visual brain in action. London: Oxford University Press.
(1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519– 1520
(2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response code) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 835– 863
(2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 259– 274
in press From number neurons to mental arithmetic: the cognitive neuroscience of number sense. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (3rd edition).
(2001). Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. NeuroImage, 14, 1013– 1026
(1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274– 278
(2002). The development of internal representations of magnitude and their association with Arabic numerals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 74– 92
(2003). On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 507– 522
(2004). Moving along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual response. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651– 664
(1991). Biometry (3rd ed). New York: Freeman.
(2002). The processing of numbers in choice-reaction tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54, 94– 98
(1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515– 557
(2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic responses activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731– 751
(1969). Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 166– 168
(2002). Enumeration of collective entities by 5-month-old infants. Cognition, 83, B55– B62
