Skip to main content
Research Article

The Role of Self-Involvement in Shifting IAT Effects

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000163

Explicit measures can be affected by self-involvement in processing of a message (Johnson & Eagly, 1989). Here, we show that self-involvement in a counter-stereotypical message also influences implicit measures such as the Implicit Association Test (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998). In our study, racial attitudes changed only after reading a counter-stereotypical scenario in which participants were asked to imagine themselves as victims of an assault as opposed to simply imagine an assault to a person. This shift did not depend on evaluative instructions and it was transient as it was no longer present after 1 week. These results suggest that the self-involvement might be an important factor in shifting implicit measures.

References

  • Barden, J. , Maddux, W. W. , Petty, R. E. , Brewer, M. B. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5–22. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence on social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman, J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bizer, G. Y. , Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 566–586. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blair, I. V. , Ma, J. E. , Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828–841. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Blankenship, K. L. , Wegener, D. T. (2008). Opening the mind to close it: Considering a message in light of important values increases message processing and later resistance to change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 196–213. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Blanton, H. , Jaccard, J. , Gonzales, P. , Christie, C. (2006). Decoding the implicit association test: Implications for criterion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 192–212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bluemke, M. , Fiedler, K. (2009). Base rate effects on the IAT. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 1029–1038. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Briñol, P. , Petty, R. E. , McCaslin, M. J. (2009). Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit measures: What is the difference? In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 285–326). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burnkrant, R. E. , Unnava, H. R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 628–638. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Correll, J. , Park, B. , Judd, C. M. , Wittenbrink, B. (2007). The influence of stereotypes on decisions to shoot. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1102–1117. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Czellar, S. , Fazio, R. H. (2008). Detecting attitude change with the implicit association test. Retrieved from econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebg:heccah:0888 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dasgupta, N. , Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Deutsch, R. , Gawronski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on “automatic evaluations” as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101–114. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dovidio, J. F. , Fazio, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about survey questions: Meaning, memory, attitudes, and social interaction (pp. 204–237). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603–637. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fazio, R. H. , Jackson, J. R. , Dunton, B. C. , Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. , Messner, C. , Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the implicit association test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fleming, M. A. , Petty, R. E. (2000). Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In D. J. Terry, M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 171–199). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Foroni, F. , Mayr, U. (2005). The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 139–144. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Gawronski, B. , Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE Model. Social Cognition, 25, 687–717. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gonsalkorale, K. , Allen, T. J. , Sherman, J. W. , Klauer, K. C. (2010). Mechanisms of group membership and exemplar exposure effects on implicit attitudes. Social Psychology, 41, 158–168. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E. , Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Greenwald, A. G. , Nosek, B. A. , Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Han, H. A. , Czellar, S. , Olson, M. A. , Fazio, R. H. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 286–298. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Horcajo, J. , Briñol, P. , Petty, R. E. (2010). Consumer persuasion: Indirect change and implicit balance. Psychology and Marketing, 27, 938–963. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hugenberg, K. , Blusiewicz, R. L. , Sacco, D. F. (2010). On malleable and immalleable subtypes: Stereotype malleability in one subtype does not spill over to other prominent subtypes. Social Psychology, 41, 124–130. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, B. T. , Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–314. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joy-Gaba, J. A. , Nosek, B. A. (2010). The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations. Social Psychology, 41, 137–146. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Marini, M. , Rubichi, S. , Sartori, G. (2011). Implicit racial stereotypes may temporarily shift after reading a story. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, T. Shipley (Eds.), 33rd Annual Conferences of Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1224–1229). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Greenwald, A. G. , Banaji, M. R. (2007). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nosek, B. A. , Smyth, F. L. , Sriram, N. , Lindner, N. M. , Devos, T. , Ayala, A. , … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10593–10597. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. In K. B. Monroe (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 8, pp. 20–24). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. , Ostrom, T. M. , Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rothermund, K. , Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the implicit association test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 139–165. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Sritharan, R. , Gawronski, B. (2010). Changing implicit and explicit prejudice: Insights from the associative-propositional evaluation model. Social Psychology, 41, 113–123. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar