Skip to main content
Original Article

Shared Leadership in Teams

A Matter of Distribution

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000017

Shared leadership is an emergent team process defined by the distribution of leadership functions among multiple team members. Past empirical research on shared leadership has operationalized it as the overall quantity of leadership in the team, neglecting the essence of the conceptual definition – the distribution of leadership. In order to align the conceptual definition with an operational one, we examined shared leadership as network centralization using social network analysis. Using this operational definition, shared leadership was positively related to team performance. Additionally, longitudinal analyses revealed that shared leadership increased over time and was differentially related to antecedents of trust and team collectivism.

References

  • Avolio, B. J. , Jung, D. , Murry, W. , & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership, Vol. 3, (pp. 173–209). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Avolio, B. J. , Sivasubramaniam, N. , Murry, W. , Jung, D. , Garger, J. W. (2003). Assessing shared leadership: Development and preliminary validation of a team multifactor leadership questionnaire. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 143–172). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barry, D. (1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 31–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borgatti, S. P. , Everett, M. G. , Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6). Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bowers, D. G. , Seashore, S. E. (1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 238–263. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. , Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Burke, C. S. , Fiore, S. M. , Salas, E. (2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 103–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cadotte, E. R. (2003a). Global corporate management in the marketplace. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Learning Solutions Inc. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cadotte, E. R. (2003b). Overview. In E. R. Cadotte, H. J. Bruce (Eds.), The management of strategy in the marketplace (pp. 1–13). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carson, J. B. , Tesluk, P. E. , Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A. , Noe, R. A. , Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–109. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dirks, K. T. , Ferrin, D. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Driskell, J. E. , Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Earley, P. C. , Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eby, L. T. , Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275–295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ensley, M. D. , Pearson, A. , Pearce, C. L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 329–346. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibb, C. A. (1954). Leadership. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, (pp. 877–917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hanneman, R. A. , Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hollenbeck, J. R. , Ilgen, D. R. , Sego, D. J. (1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Houghton, J. D. , Neck, C. P. , & Manz, C. C. (2003). Self-leadership and superleadership: The heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 123–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. , Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, C. L. , Colquitt, J. A. , Wesson, M. J. , Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884–899. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, L. R. , Demaree, R. G. , Wolf, G. (1993). r wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, G. R. , George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. E. , Heffner, T. S. , Goodwin, G. F. , Salas, E. , Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, R. C. , Davis, J. H. , Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayo, M. , Meindl, J. R. , Pastor, J. (2003). Shared leadership in work teams. A social network approach. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 193–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mehra, A. , Smith, B. R. , Dixon, A. L. , Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Conger, J. A. (2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C. L. Pearce, J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Conger, J. A. , Locke, E. A. (2008). Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 622–628. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Manz, C. C. (2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130–140. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P. (2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 353–359. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Sims, H. P. (2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, Vol. 7, (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: JAI Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Sims, H. P. (2002). Vertical vs. shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pearce, C. L. , Yoo, Y. , Alavi, M. (2004). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership in the nonprofit section. In R. E. Riggio, S. Smith Orr (Eds.), Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 180–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perry, M. L. , Pearce, C. L. , Sims, H. P. (1999). Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 3, 35–51. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simons, T. L. , Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stogdill, R. M. (1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire – Form XII. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sundstrom, E. , DeMeuse, K. P. , & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. , Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar