Abstract
Shared leadership is an emergent team process defined by the distribution of leadership functions among multiple team members. Past empirical research on shared leadership has operationalized it as the overall quantity of leadership in the team, neglecting the essence of the conceptual definition – the distribution of leadership. In order to align the conceptual definition with an operational one, we examined shared leadership as network centralization using social network analysis. Using this operational definition, shared leadership was positively related to team performance. Additionally, longitudinal analyses revealed that shared leadership increased over time and was differentially related to antecedents of trust and team collectivism.
References
1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance. In , Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team leadership, Vol. 3, (pp. 173–209). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
(2003). Assessing shared leadership: Development and preliminary validation of a team multifactor leadership questionnaire. In , Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 143–172). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1991). Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 21, 31–47.
(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
(1999). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6). Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
(1966). Predicting organizational effectiveness with a four-factor theory of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11, 238–263.
(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In , Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2003). The role of shared cognition in enabling shared leadership and team adaptability. In , Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 103–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2003a). Global corporate management in the marketplace. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Learning Solutions Inc.
(2003b). Overview. In , The management of strategy in the marketplace (pp. 1–13). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
(2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.
(2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 55, 83–109.
(1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445–455.
(2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.
(1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277–288.
(1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304.
(1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275–295.
(2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 329–346.
(1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
(1954). Leadership. In , Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, (pp. 877–917). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.
(2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
(1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3–23.
(2003). Self-leadership and superleadership: The heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams. In , Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 123–140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
(2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884–899.
(1993). r wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.
(1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.
(2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273–283.
(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.
(2003). Shared leadership in work teams. A social network approach. In , Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 193–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245.
(2003). All those years ago: The historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In , Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2008). Shared leadership theory. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 622–628.
(2005). The new silver bullets of leadership: The importance of self-and shared leadership in knowledge work. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 130–140.
(2008). The roles of vertical and shared leadership in the enactment of executive corruption: Implications for research and practice. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 353–359.
(2000). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. In , Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, Vol. 7, (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: JAI Press.
(2002). Vertical vs. shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.
(2004). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership in the nonprofit section. In , Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations (pp. 180–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(1999). Empowered selling teams: How shared leadership can contribute to selling team outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 3, 35–51.
(2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102–111.
(1963). Manual for the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire – Form XII. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, College of Commerce and Administration.
(1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.
(2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
(1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152–172.
(2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 229–239.
(