Abstract
A major preoccupation in physical sciences has been to interpret macroscopic events from microscopic phenomena. In some cases the change of scale is efficient and fairly easy to perform, but in others it turns out to be difficult and uninteresting. Success or failure is due more to the nature of the events than to the efficiency of the theoretical methods used. Some macroscopic phenomena have their origin in a microscopic organization which can be transferred to larger scales whereas others attain their structure on the macroscopic scale itself. Thus before applying scaling laws techniques1–4 one must ensure that embedded scales are suggested by physical observations. That this seems to be the case for the fracture of rocks is supported by geological, seismological and rock mechanics observations. We have therefore built a very simple model based on scaling laws which yields a criterion for fragility at different scales and views rupture as a critical point. We use this model here to outline a general approach to earthquake prediction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilson, K. & Kogert, J. Phys. Rep. 12 C, 77 (1974).
Toulouse, G. & Pfeuty, P. Introduction au Groupe de Renormalisation et à ses Applications (Presse Université de Grenoble, 1975).
De Gennes, P. G. Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, 1979).
Madden, T. R. Geophysics 41, 1104 (1976).
Mattauer, M., Déformations de l'Écorce Terrestre (Hermann, Paris, 1976).
Aki, K. J. geophys. Res. 84, 6140 (1979).
Madariaga, R. in Identification of Seismic Sources, 71 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981).
Brace, W. F., Paulding, B. & Scholz, C. H. J. geophys. Res. 71, 3939 (1966).
Waversik, W. R. & Brace, W. F. Rock Mech. 3, 61 (1971).
Brace, W. F. & Bombolakis, E. G. J. geophys. Res. 68, 3709 (1963).
Tapponnier, P. & Brace, W. F. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Mm. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 13, 103 (1976).
Scholz, C. H., Sykes, L. R. & Aggarwal, Y. P. Science 181, 803 (1973).
Anderson, E. M. The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation with Applications to Britain (Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 2nd ed., 1951).
Scholz, C. H. & Kranz, R. J. geophys. Res. 79, 2132 (1974).
Hadkey, B. Proc. Conf. on Tectonic Problems at Low Confining Pressures (ed. Nur, A.) 427 (CRL, Kovach, 1980).
Abe, K. J. geophys. Res. 79, 4393 (1974).
Aki, K. J. geophys. Res. 73, 5359 (1968).
Mogi, K. Bull. Earth Res. Inst. Tokyo 40, 125 (1962).
Kranz, R. L. J. Rock Mech. Mm. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 16, 23 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allègre, C., Le Mouel, J. & Provost, A. Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction. Nature 297, 47–49 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/297047a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/297047a0
This article is cited by
-
Multifractal Scaling characteristics of lineament networks of a fractured sandstone aquifer system
Earth Science Informatics (2024)
-
Critical damage threshold of brittle rock failure based on Renormalization Group theory
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources (2022)
-
Random Self-Similar Trees: Emergence of Scaling Laws
Surveys in Geophysics (2022)
-
Analysis of Seismic Activity Using Self-Organizing Map: Implications for Earthquake Prediction
Pure and Applied Geophysics (2022)
-
Risk assessment of roof water disaster due to multi-seam mining at Wulunshan Coal Mine in China
Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.