Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The quasi-crystalline phase in the Mg—Al—Zn system

Abstract

Shechtman et al.1 have reported a phase in rapidly solidified Al86Mn14 alloy with long-range orientational order, but with icosahedral point-group symmetry, which is inconsistent with lattice translations. However, Pauling2 has argued that the apparent icosahedral symmetry in A186Mn14 alloy is due to directed multiple twinning of cubic crystals with a cube edge of 26.7 Å. We report here the powder X-ray diffraction study of a rapidly solidified Mg32(Al, Zn)49 alloy which shows 5–3–2 symmetry diffraction in transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Also reported is a study of rapidly solidified Mg2A13 alloy. The advantage of these alloys is that β-Mg2Al3, which has nearly the same structure as proposed by Pauling for the rapidly quenched Al86Mn14, is an equilibrium phase. This is unlike the Al–Mn system, where, according to Pauling, the cubic phase occurs in a metastable and already twinned form. The present choice of alloy systems makes it possible to compare the X-ray diffraction patterns from the quasi-crystalline phase and a cubic phase with nearly the same structure as proposed by Pauling. We observe that the X-ray diffraction pattern of rapidly solidified Mg32(Al, Zn)49 alloy is distinct from those of the equilibrium phases and that the pattern can be completely indexed to an icosahedral phase. We argue that the above observation is inconsistent with the proposal that the material consists of an aggregate of twinned cubic crystals. Therefore, the alternative is to invoke a quasi-crystalline lattice to explain the observed 5–3–2 symmetry diffraction in TEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951–1953 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pauling, L. Nature 317, 512–514 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Field, R. D. & Fraser, H. L. Mater. Sci. Engng 68, L17–L21 (1984–85).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramachandra, Rao, P. & Sastry, G. V. S. Pramana - J. Phys. 25, L225–L230 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bancel, P. A., Heiney, P. A., Stephens, P. W., Goldman, A. I. & Horn, P. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2422–2425 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergman, G., Waugh, J. L. T. & Pauling, L. Nature 169, 1056 (1952); Acta crystallogr. 10, 254 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Samson, S. Nature 295, 259–262 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rajasekharan, T., Akhtar, D., Gopalan, R. et al. The quasi-crystalline phase in the Mg—Al—Zn system. Nature 322, 528–530 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/322528a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/322528a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing