Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles

Abstract

The spatial organization of individuals in populations (their spacing system) can be highly variable even among populations of the same species1. As spacing systems have important consequences for ecological processes such as population regulation, competition and mating systems2,3, there have been many attempts to explore factors that may cause this variation. For mammals, it has been argued that the spatial distribution of sexually receptive females is the most important factor determining the spacing system of males, whereas habitat characteristics are most important to females4–6. This has been difficult to test experimentally as it requires manipulations of the spatial distribution of the opposite sex without changing other properties of the environment7. Here, I present a novel experimental procedure that can achieve this and demonstrate that the spatial distribution of the opposite sex in a population of voles is indeed an important determinant of the spacing system of males, but not of females. However, the effects on males are different from those predicted by many theoretical studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lott, D. F. Behaviour 88, 266–325 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J. L. & Orians, G. H. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 239–262 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter, F. L. Am. Zool. 27, 223–228 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wittenberger, J. F. Animal Social Behaviour (Duxbury, Princeton, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg, J. F. The Mammalian Radiation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ostfeld, R. S. Am. Nat. 126, 1–15 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ostfeld, R. S. Oikos 48, 238–240 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ims, R. A. Ecology (in the press).

  9. Davies, N. B. & Houston, A. I. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 148–169 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carpenter, F. L. Am. Zool. 27, 387–397 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hixon, M. A. Am. Zool. 27, 229–247 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. Science 197, 215–223 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ims, R. A. J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 585–596 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostfeld, R. J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 691–706 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, G. C. Am. Nat. 100, 687–690 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trivers, R. L. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed. Cambell, B.) 136–179 (Aldine, Chicago, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ims, R. A. Am. Nat. 130, 475–484 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker, G. A. in Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 30–61 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schwagmeyer, P. L. & Woontner, S. J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 291–296 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufman, J. J. Biol. Rev. 58, 1–20 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klecka, W. R. SPSS: Statistical Package for Social Sciences (eds Nie, N. H. et al.) 434–468 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacFarlane, J. D. & Taylor, J. M. J. Mammal 63, 104–109 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawata, M. Oikos 45, 181–190 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ims, R. Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles. Nature 335, 541–543 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/335541a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/335541a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing